Identification of questionable exclusion criteria in mental disorder clinical trials using a medical encyclopedia

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 219-230

  Ma, Handong ^a   Weng, Chunhua ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES; MATCHING CONDITION; MENTAL DISORDERS; PRECISE DEFINITION; SCALE-FREE PROPERTIES; TERM FREQUENCY;

CLINICAL RESEARCH;

BIOLOGY; BOOK; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MENTAL DISEASE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION; ENCYCLOPEDIAS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE BASES; MENTAL DISORDERS; PRECISION MEDICINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85012196193     PISSN: 23356928     EISSN: 23356936     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/9789814749411_0021     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Ross J, Tu S, Carini S, Sim I. Analysis of eligibility criteria complexity in clinical trials. AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings. 2010; 2010: 46.
2. Friedman LM, Furberg C, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of clinical trials. Vol 4: Springer; 2010.
3. Elting LS, Cooksley C, Bekele BN, et al. Generalizability of cancer clinical trial results: prognostic differences between participants and nonparticipants. Cancer. 2006; 106 (11): 2452-2458.
4. Heiat A, Gross CP, Krumholz HM. Representation of the elderly, women, and minorities in heart failure clinical trials. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2002; 162 (15).
5. Weng C, Tu SW, Sim I, Richesson R. Formal representation of eligibility criteria: a literature review. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2010; 43 (3): 451-467.
6. Jensen PB, Jensen LJ, Brunak S. Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2012; 13 (6): 395-405.
7. Hoffman S, Podgurski A. Improving health care outcomes through personalized comparisons of treatment effectiveness based on electronic health records. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2011; 39 (3): 425-436.
8. Weng C, Li Y, Ryan P, et al. A Distribution-based Method for Assessing The Differences between Clinical Trial Target Populations and Patient Populations in Electronic Health Records. Applied clinical informatics. 2014; 5 (2): 463.
9. Weng C. Optimizing Clinical Research Participant Selection with Informatics. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2015: In Press.
10. Weiskopf NG, Weng C. Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2013; 20 (1): 144-151.
11. Ozdas A, Shiavi RG, Silverman SE, Silverman MK, Wilkes DM. Investigation of vocal jitter and glottal flow spectrum as possible cues for depression and near-term suicidal risk. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004; 51 (9): 1530-1540.
12. Boland MR, Miotto R, Weng C. A Method for Probing Disease Relatedness Using Common Clinical Eligibility Criteria. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2013; 192: 481.
13. Miotto R, Weng C. Unsupervised mining of frequent tags for clinical eligibility text indexing. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2013; 46 (6): 1145-1151.
14. Newman ME. Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical review E. 2001; 64 (1): 016132.
15. Hoertel N, Le Strat Y, Lavaud P, Dubertret C, Limosin F. Generalizability of clinical trial results for bipolar disorder to community samples: findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 2013; 74 (3): 265-270.