The research life cycle and the health sciences librarian: Responding to change in scholarly communication

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 80-83

  Ketchum, Andrea M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LIBRARY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PUBLISHING; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; LIBRARIES, MEDICAL; OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PUBLISHING; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

EID: 85012113071     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2017.110     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Søndergaard TF, Andersen J, Hjørland B. Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information: revising and updating the UNISIST model. J Doc. 2003;59(3):278–20.
2. Björk BC. A lifecycle model of the scientific communication process. Learned Publishing. 2005;18:165–76.
3. Hjørland B, Søndergaard TF, Andersen J. UNISIST model and knowledge domains. In: Encyclopedia of library and information science. CRC Press; 2005. p. 1–14.
4. Björk BC. A model of scientific communication as a global distributed information system. Inf Res. 2007;12(2):1–48.
5. ORCID Inc. ORCID [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 5]. .
6. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). My NCBI [Internet]. US National Library of Medicine; 2016 [cited 14 Apr 2016]. .
7. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). SciENcv [Internet]. US National Library of Medicine [cited 14 May 2016]. .
8. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). My Bibliography [tutorial] [Internet]. US National Library of Medicine; 2016 [cited 14 May 2016]. .
9. Vaughan KTL, Hayes BE, Lerner RC, McElfresh KR, Pavlech L, Romito D, Reeves LH, Morris EN. Development of the research lifecycle model for library services. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Oct;101(4):310–4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.013.
10. Kramer B, Bosman J. 101 Innovations in scholarly communication [Internet]. Utrecht, Netherlands: Force 15; 2015 [cited 18 Apr 2016]. .
11. Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu AU, Wu L, Read E, Manoff M, Frame M. Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21101.
12. Curation Center of the California Digital Library. DMPTool [Internet]. Oakland, CA: University of California; 2016 [cited 2 May 2016]. .
13. University of New Mexico–Valencia. The scientific publication cycle [Internet]. Adapted from the Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, vol. 26. The University and Marcel Dekker; 1979, 2010 [cited 4 Oct 2016]. .
14. Assante M, Candela L, Castelli D, Manghi P, Pagano P, Nazionale C. Science 2.0 repositories: time for a change in scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine. 2015 Jan/Feb;21(1/2):1–14.
15. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Strategies for Responsible Sharing of Clinical Trial Data, Board on Health Sciences Policy. The clinical trial life cycle and when to share. In: Sharing clinical trial data: maximizing benefits, minimizing risk. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2015. p. 91–137.
16. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Allergy and Critical Care Medicine. Life cycle of a research project [Internet]. The University; 2015 [cited 13 Apr 2016]. .