The constitutionalization of the israeli legal system as a result of the basic laws and its effect on procedural and substantive criminal law

Israel Law Review

Volumn 31, Issue 1-3, 1997, Pages 3-23

  Barak, Aharon ^a  

^a Supreme Court ^*  (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012091515     PISSN: 00212237     EISSN: 20479336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0021223700015223     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Basic Law: Freedom of Occupation (S.H. 1994, No. 1454, p. 90) repeals and replaces the former Basic Law on Freedom of Occupation enacted in 1992 {S.H. No. 1387, p. 114.
2. Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty (S.H. 1992, No. 1391, p. 150). The full text of this Law is reprinted at the end of this article, p. 21.
3. Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty, sec. 8;
4. Basic Law. Freedom of Occupation, sec. 4.
5. Basic Law. Freedom of Occupation, at 421.
6. Basic Law. Freedom of Occupation
7. See Barak, Interpretation in Law, Vol. III: Constitutional Interpretation (Jerusalem, 1994, in Hebrew).
8. See R. v. Oakes [1988] 1 S.C.R. 103;
9. P.W. Hogg, “Interpreting the Charter of Rights: Generosity and Justification” (1990) 28 Osgoode Hall L.J. 817;
10. La Forest, “The Balancing of Interest Under the Charter” (1992) 2 N.J.C.L. 133;
11. Weinrib, “The Supreme Court of Canada and Section One of the Charter” (1988) 10, S. Ct. L.R. 469.
12. K. Hesse, Grundziige des Verfassungsrechts für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Karlsruhe, 16th ed., 1988) 27.
13. P. van Dijk and G.J.H. van Hoof, Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights (Deventer, 2nd ed., 1990) 573.
14. Sunday Times v. United Kingdom (1979) 2 E.H.R.R. 245, at 270.
15. See also Malone v. United Kingdom (1984) 7 E.H.R.R. 14, at 40;
16. Silver v. United Kingdom (1983) 5 E.H.R.R. 547.
17. United Mizrachi Bank v. Migdal Kfar Shitufi (the Gal case) (1995) 49(iv) P.D. 221, at 434.
18. D.P. Kommers, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (Durham and London, 1989) 316–320.
19. R. v. Smith (1987) 1 S.C.R. 1045.
20. R. v. Dauiault (1994) 3 S.C.R. 363.
21. R. v. Vaillancourt (1987) 2 S.C.R. 636.
22. 36 L.S.I. 35.
23. Cf. R. v. Hebert [1990] 2 S.C.R. 151; R. v. Broyles [1991] 3, S.C.R. 595.