Comparing 2 adhesive methods on skin integrity in the high-risk neonate

Advances in Neonatal Care

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 449-454

  Boswell, Nicole ^a   Waker, Cheryl L ^a  

^a Innovation Center at Kettering Health Network   (United States)

Author keywords

adhesive products; comparison study; neonate; skin care; skin integrity

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT;

ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROCOLLOID DRESSING; MALE; NEWBORN; PREMATURITY; SKIN CARE; SKIN DISEASES;

ADHESIVES; BANDAGES, HYDROCOLLOID; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, EXTREMELY PREMATURE; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; MALE; SKIN CARE; SKIN DISEASES;

EID: 85012066977     PISSN: 15360903     EISSN: 15360911     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000333     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Afsar FS. Skin care for preterm and term infants. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009 ; 34 : 855-858
2. Visscher M, Narendran V. Neonatal infant skin: development, structure and function. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2014 ; 14 ( 4 ): 135-141
3. Allwood M. Skin care guidelines for infants aged 23-30 weeks' gestation: a review of the literature. Neonatal Paediatr Child Health Nurs. 2011 ; 14 ( 1 ): 20-27
4. Visscher MO. Update on the use of topical agents in neonates. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2009 ; 9 ( 1 ): 31-47
5. Baharestani MM. An overview of neonatal and pediatric wound care knowledge and considerations. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007 ; 53 ( 6 ): 34-55
6. Lund C. Medical adhesives in the NICU. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2014 ; 14 ( 4 ): 160-165
7. Sardesai SR, Kornacka MK, Walas W, Ramanathan R. Iatrogenic skin injury in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 ; 24 ( 2 ): 197-203
8. O'Neil A, Schumacher B. Application of a pectin barrier for medical adhesive skin injury (epidermal stripping) in a premature infant. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2014 ; 41 ( 3 ): 219-221
9. Shwayder T, Akland T. Neonatal skin barrier: structure, function, and disorders. Dermatol Ther. 2005 ; 18 : 87-103
10. Press Ganey. National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI). http://www.pressganey.com/solutions/clinical-quality/nursing-quality. Accessed March 2016
11. National Quality Forum. Preventing adverse hospital acquired conditions http://www.qualityforum.org/topics/patient-safety. Accessed March 2016
12. Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. Neonatal Skin Care, Evidenced Based Clinical Practice Guideline. 3rd ed. Washington, DC : Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses ; 2013
13. Lund CH, Nonato LB, Kuller JM, Franck LS, Cullander C, Durand DJ. Disruption of barrier function in neonatal skin associated with adhesive removal. J Ped. 1997 ; 131 : 367-372
14. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lan A-G, Buchner A. G∗Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 ; 2 : 175-191
15. Lund CH, Osborne JW. Validity and reliability of the Neonatal Skin Condition Score. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 ; 33 ( 3 ): 320-327
16. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd ed. London, England : Sage Publications, Ltd ; 2009
17. Lund CH, Kuller JM. Integumentary system. In: Kenner CJ, Lott JW, eds. Comprehensive Neonatal Nursing Care. 5th ed. St Louis, MO : Saunders Elsevier ; 2014
18. Elser HE. Options for securing umbilical catheters. Adv Neonatal Care. 2013 ; 13 ( 6 ): 426-429
19. Sharpe E, Pettit J, Ellsbury DL. A national survey of neonatal peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) practices. Adv Neonatal Care. 2013 ; 13 ( 1 ): 55-74
20. National Association of Neonatal Nurses. Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Guideline for Practice. 3rd ed. Glenview, IL : National Association of Neonatal Nurses ; 2015