Challenges of implementation and implementation research: Learning from an intervention study designed to improve tumor registry reporting

SAGE Open Medicine

Volumn 4, Issue , 2016, Pages

  McAlearney, Ann Scheck ^a   Walker, Daniel M ^a   Livaudais Toman, Jennifer ^b   Parides, Michael ^b   Bickell, Nina A ^b  

^a THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer therapies; Case study; Implementation research; Innovation implementation; Intervention study; Tumor registries

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER REGISTRY; COMMUNITY CARE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVIDENCE BASED EMERGENCY MEDICINE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; INTERVIEW; LEARNING; MEDICAL CARE; ONCOLOGIST; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESEARCH;

EID: 85011874829     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20503121     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2050312116666215     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Klein KJ and Sorra JS. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manage Rev 1996; 21(4): 1055-1080.
2. Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, et al. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 3: CD005470.
3. Bickell NA, Wellner J, Franco R, et al. New accountability, new challenges: improving treatment reporting to a tumor registry. J Oncol Pract 2013; 9(3): e81-e85.
4. Birken SA, Lee SY, Weiner BJ, et al. From strategy to action: how top managers’ support increases middle managers’ commitment to innovation implementation in health care organizations. Health Care Manage Rev 2015; 40(2): 159-168.
5. Birken SA, Lee SY, Weiner BJ, et al. Improving the effectiveness of health care innovation implementation: middle managers as change agents. Med Care Res Rev 2013; 70(1): 29-45.
6. McAlearney AS, Wellner J and Bickell NA. How to improve breast cancer care measurement and reporting: suggestions from a complex urban hospital. J Healthc Manag 2013; 58(3): 205-223; discussion 223-224.
7. Alexander JA. Quality improvement in healthcare organizations: a review of research on QI implementation. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2008.
8. Bryant J, Boyes A, Jones K, et al. Examining and addressing evidence-practice gaps in cancer care: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2014; 9(1): 37.
9. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, et al. Effectivenessimplementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care 2012; 50(3): 217-226.
10. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009; 4: 50.
11. Feldstein AC and Glasgow RE. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2008; 34(4): 228-243.
12. Glasgow RE, Bull SS, Gillette C, et al. Behavior change intervention research in healthcare settings: a review of recent reports with emphasis on external validity. Am J Prev Med 2002; 23(1): 62-69.
13. Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E and Marcus AC. Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health 2003; 93(8): 1261-1267.
14. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM and Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999; 89(9): 1322-1327.
15. Green LW and Glasgow RE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof 2006; 29(1): 126-153.
16. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, et al. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci 2012; 7: 50.
17. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282(15): 1458-1465.
18. Reschovsky JD, Hadley J and Landon BE. Effects of compensation methods and physician group structure on physicians’ perceived incentives to alter services to patients. Health Serv Res 2006; 41(4 Pt 1): 1200-1220.
19. Stetler CB, Legro MW, Wallace CM, et al. The role of formative evaluation in implementation research and the QUERI experience. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21(Suppl. 2): S1-S8.
20. Stetler CB, McQueen L, Demakis J, et al. An organizational framework and strategic implementation for system-level change to enhance research-based practice: QUERI Series. Implement Sci 2008; 3: 30.
21. Davies P, Walker AE and Grimshaw JM. A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci 2010; 5: 14.
22. Hagedorn H, Hogan M, Smith JL, et al. Lessons learned about implementing research evidence into clinical practice. Experiences from VA QUERI. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21(Suppl. 2): S21-S24.
23. Sales A, Smith J, Curran G, et al. Models, strategies, and tools. Theory in implementing evidence-based findings into health care practice. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21(Suppl. 2): S43-S49.
24. Ploeg J, Davies B, Edwards N, et al. Factors influencing best-practice guideline implementation: lessons learned from administrators, nursing staff, and project leaders. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2007; 4(4): 210-219.
25. Flottorp SA, Oxman AD, Krause J, et al. A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci 2013; 8: 35.
26. Bickell NA, McAlearney AS, Wellner J, et al. Understanding the challenges of adjuvant treatment measurement and reporting in breast cancer: cancer treatment measuring and reporting. Med Care 2013; 51(6): e35-e40.
27. Bickell NA and Chassin MR. Determining the quality of breast cancer care: do tumor registries measure up? Ann Intern Med 2000; 132(9): 705-710.
28. Edwards BK, Brown ML, Wingo PA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population- based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97(19): 1407-1427.
29. Helfrich CD, Weiner BJ, McKinney MM, et al. Determinants of implementation effectiveness: adapting a framework for complex innovations. Med Care Res Rev 2007; 64(3): 279-303.
30. Strauss A and Corbins J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1998.
31. Constas M. Qualitative analysis as a public event: the documentation of category development procedures. Am Educ Res J 1992; 29: 253-266.
32. Shea CM, Jacobs SR, Esserman DA, et al. Organizational readiness for implementing change: a psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implement Sci 2014; 9: 7.
33. Weiner BJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci 2009; 4: 67.