Rates of invasive management of cardiogenic shock in New York before and after exclusion from public reporting

JAMA Cardiology

Volumn 1, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 640-647

  Bangalore, Sripal ^a   Guo, Yu ^a   Xu, Jinfeng ^b   Blecker, Saul ^a   Gupta, Navdeep ^c   Feit, Frederick ^a   Hochman, Judith S ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CALIFORNIA; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COHORT ANALYSIS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICHIGAN; NEW JERSEY; NEW YORK; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVASCULARIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; MANDATORY REPORTING; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; CALIFORNIA; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDATORY REPORTING; MICHIGAN; NEW JERSEY; NEW YORK; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; SHOCK, CARDIOGENIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85011830542     PISSN: 23806583     EISSN: 23806591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0785     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hannan EL, Kilburn H Jr, Racz M, Shields E, Chassin MR. Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. JAMA. 1994;271(10):761-766.
2. Apolito RA, Greenberg MA, Menegus MA, et al. Impact of the New York State Cardiac Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J. 2008;155(2):267-273.
3. Joynt KE, Blumenthal DM, Orav EJ, Resnic FS, Jha AK. Association of public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention with utilization and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2012;308(14): 1460-1468.
4. Hannan EL, Cozzens K, King SB III, Walford G, Shah NR. The New York State cardiac registries: history, contributions, limitations, and lessons for future efforts to assess and publicly report healthcare outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59 (25):2309-2316.
5. Santora M. Cardiologists say rankings affect surgical decisions. New York Times. 2005, 2005.
6. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: SHOCK Investigators: should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(9):625-634.
7. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al; SHOCK Investigators. Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2006;295(21):2511-2515.
8. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127(4): e362-e425.
9. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al; Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(20):2569-2619.
10. Bangalore S, Gupta N, Guo Y, et al. Outcomes with invasive vs conservative management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2015;128(6):601-608.
11. Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, et al; POISE Study Group. Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9627):1839-1847.
12. Rosenbaum P, Rubin D. The central role of propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41-55.
13. Rubin D. Using propensity score to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2001;2:169-188.
14. Ahmed A, Husain A, Love TE, et al. Heart failure, chronic diuretic use, and increase in mortality and hospitalization: an observational study using propensity score methods. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(12):1431-1439.
15. Normand ST, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, et al. Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(4):387-398.
16. Bureau of Health Informatics, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, NYS Department of Health. SPARCS Operations Guide, Version 1.1. 2014. http://www.health.ny.gov/statistics/sparcs/training/docs/sparcs_operations_guide.pdf. Published September 2014. Accessed July 9, 2015.
17. Goldberg RJ, Samad NA, Yarzebski J, Gurwitz J, Bigelow C, Gore JM. Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(15):1162-1168.
18. Hands ME, Rutherford JD, Muller JE, et al; MILIS Study Group. The in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: incidence, predictors of occurrence, outcome and prognostic factors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14(1): 40-46.
19. Boyden TF, Joynt KE, McCoy L, et al. Collaborative quality improvement vs public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention: a comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention in New York vs Michigan. Am Heart J. 2015;170(6):1227-1233.
20. New York State Department of Health, Division of Quality and Patient Safety, Cardiac Services Program. Percutaneous coronary interventions report: instructions and data element definitions, 2011 discharges. https://www.health.ny.gov/forms/cardiac_surgery/2011/pcirs/pcirs_instructions.pdf. Accessed July 2015.
21. Hannan EL. The public reporting risk of performing high-risk procedures: perception or reality? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(1, pt A):17-19.
22. Donelan K, Rogers RS, Eisenhauer A, Mort E, Agnihotri AK. Consumer comprehension of surgeon performance data for coronary bypass procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(5):1400-1405.
23. Brown DL, Epstein AM, Schneider EC. Influence of cardiac surgeon report cards on patient referral by cardiologists in New York State after 20 years of public reporting. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(6):643-648.