Forecasting the field performance of Austrian pine seedlings using morphological attributes

IForest

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 99-107

  Ivetić, Vladan ^a   Grossnickle, Steven ^b   Škoric, Mirko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^b NurserytoForest Solutions   (Canada)

Author keywords

Pinus nigra; Reforestation; Seedling performance; Seedling quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011802411     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19717458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3832/ifor1722-009     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bernier PY, Lamhamedi MS, Simpson DG (1995). Shoot: root ratio is of limited use in evaluating the quality of container conifer stock. Tree Planters’ Notes 46: 102-106. [online] URL: http://www.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/publications/?id=33715
2. Burdett AN (1983) Quality control in the production of forest planting stock. The Forestry Chronicle 59 (3): 132-138. - doi: 10.5558/tfc59132-3
3. Burdett AN (1990) Physiological processes in plantation establishment and the development of specifications for forest planting stock. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 415-427. - doi: 10.1139/x90-059
4. Djordjević D (1991). Comparative research of growth dynamics of Austrian pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) root system in the first year produced in the open and in the rigid containers. Bulletin of the Faculty of Forestry 73: 231-239. [in Serbian]
5. Dominguez-Lerena S, Herrero Sierra N, Carrasco Manzano I, Ocana Bueno L, Penuelas Rubira JL, Mexal JG (2006) Container characteristics influence Pinus pinea seedling development in the nursery and field. Forest Ecology and Management 221: 63-71. - doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005. 08.031
6. Dunsworth GB (1997) Plant quality assessment: an industrial perspective. New Forests 13 (1-3): 439-448. - doi: 10.1023/A: 1006519315955
7. Grossnickle SC (2000). Ecophysiology of northern spruce species: the performance of planted seedlings. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, pp. 407. - [online] URL: http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/97 80660179599
8. Grossnickle SC (2005a). Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New Forests 30: 273-294. - doi: 10.1007/s11056-004-83 03-2
9. Grossnickle SC (2005b). Seedling size and reforestation success. How big is big enough?. In:"The thin green line: a symposium on the stateof-the-art in reforestation" (Colombo SJ ed). Forest Research Information Paper 160, Ontario Forest Research Institute, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada, pp. 138-144. [online] URL: http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploa ds/2011/02/the-thin-green-line-research-on-refor estation.pdf#page=145
10. Grossnickle SC (2012) Why seedlings survive: importance of plant attributes. New Forests 43: 711-738. - doi: 10.1007/s11056-012-9336-6
11. Grossnickle SC (2016) Restoration silviculture: an ecophysiological perspective - Lessons learned across 40 years. Reforesta 1: 1-36. - doi: 10.21750/REFOR.1.02.2
12. Grossnickle SC, Folk RS (1993). Stock quality assessment: forecasting survival or performance on a reforestation site. Tree Planters’ Notes 44: 113-121. [online] URL: http://s3.ama zonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/462519 40/
13. Grossnickle SC, South DB (2014) Fall acclimation and the lift/store pathway: effect on reforestation. The Open Forest Science Journal 7: 1-20. - doi: 10.2174/1874398601407010001
14. Hulten H (1976). How the physiologist can improve the raising of container grown stock and its establishment. Research Note no. 81, Department of Reforestation, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 12.
15. Ivetić V (2015). Reforestation in Serbia: success or failure?. In: Proceedings of the International Conference "Reforestation Challenges" (Ivetić V, Stanković D eds). Belgrade (Serbia) 03-06 Jun 2015. Reforesta, Belgrade, Serbia, pp. 1-12.
16. Ivetić V, Devetaković J (2016). Reforestation challenges in Southeast Europe facing climate change. Reforesta 1: 178-220. [online] URL: http://www.reforestationchallenges.org/REFO R/index.php/REFOR/article/view/1
17. Ivetić V, Škorić M (2013). The impact of seeds provenance and nursery production method on Austrian pine (Pinus nigra Arnold) seedlings quality Annals of Forest Research 56 (2): 297-305. [online] URL: http://afrjournal.org/index.p hp/afr/article/view/29
18. Ivetić V, Vilotić D (2014). The role of plantation forestry in sustainable development. Bulletin of Faculty of Forestry (Special Edition): 157-180. [online] URL: http://search.proquest.com/open view/0259c0cf0bb575f6fefae2b753b7530c/1
19. th Central Hardwood Forest Conference". General Technical Report NE-316, USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experimental Station, St. Paul, MN, USA, pp. 382-388. [online] URL: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228774574
20. Johnson JD, Cline ML (1991). Seedling quality of southern pines. In: "Forest Regeneration Manual" (Duryea ML, Dougherty PM eds). Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 143-162. - doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-3800-0_8
21. Kolevska DD, Trajkov P (2012). Quality and development of containerized seedlings and stands of Austrian black pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) in the Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) Forestry Ideas 18 (1-43): 19-27. [online] URL: http://for estry-ideas.info/files/journal/Forestry_Ideas_BG _2012_1.pdf.pdf#page=19
22. Kormanik PP (1986). Lateral root morphology as an expression of sweetgum seedling quality. Forest Science 32: 595-604. [online] URL: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/saf/fs/1986/00000032/00000003/art00008
23. th Northcentral Tree Improvement Association" (Maurice E, Demerit Jr eds). University Park (PA, USA) 7-8 Jul 1988. Penn State University, PA, USA, pp. 181-187.
24. McKay HM (1997) A review of the effects of stresses between lifting and planting on nursery stock quality and performance. New Forests 13: 369-399. - doi: 10.1023/A: 1006563130 976
25. McTague JP, Tinus RW (1996). The effects of seedling quality and forest site weather on field survival of ponderosa pine Tree Planters’ Notes 47 (1): 16-32. [online] URL: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US199 7053023
26. Mexal JG, Cuevas Rangel RA, Landis TD (2009). Reforestation success in central Mexico: Factors determining survival and early growth Tree Planters’ Notes 53 (1): 16-22.
27. Mexal JG, Landis TD (1990). Target seedling concepts: height and diameter. In: Proceedings of Combined Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Association Target Seedling Symposium. General Technical Report RM-200, USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO, USA, pp. 17-36. [online] URL: http://www.rngr.net/publication s/proceedings/1990/mexal.pdf
28. Oliet J, Planelles R, Artero F, Valverde R, Jacobs D, Segura ML (2009) Field performance of Pinus halepensis planted in Mediterranean arid conditions: relative influence of seedling morphology and mineral nutrition. New Forests 37: 313-331. - doi: 10.1007/s11056-008-9126-3
29. Pinto JR, Dumroese RK, Davis AS, Landis TD (2011a). Conducting seedling stock type trials: a new approach to an old question. Journal of Forestry 109 (5): 293-299.
30. Pinto JR, Marshall JD, Dumroese RK, Davis AS, Cobos DR (2011b). Establishment and growth of container seedlings for reforestation: a function of stocktype and edaphic conditions. Forest Ecology and Management 261 (11): 1876-1884. - doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.02.010
31. Ranković N (2009). Afforestation in Serbia in the period 1961-2007 with special reference to Austrian pine and Scots pine. Bulletin of Faculty of Forestry 99: 115-134. [In Serbian]. [online] URL: http://scindeks.ceon.rs/article.aspx?artid=0353-45370999115R&lang=en
32. Ritchie GA (1984). Assessing seedling quality. In:"Forest nursery manual: production of bareroot seedlings" (Duryea ML, Landis TD eds.). Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 243-266.
33. Rose R, Carlson WC, Morgan P (1990). The target seedling concept. In: Proceedings of the Combined Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Association Target Seedling Symposium (Rose R, Campbell SJ, Landis TD eds). Technical Report RM-200, USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO, USA, pp. 1-8. [online] URL: http://www. rngr.net/publications/proceedings/1990/rose.p df
34. Rose R, Gleason JF, Atkinson M (1993) Morphological and water-stress characteristics of three Douglas-fir stocktypes in relation to seedling performance under different soil moisture conditions. New Forests 7: 1-17. - doi: 10.1007/BF00 037468
35. Rose R, Haase DL, Kroiher F, Sabin T (1997). Root volume and growth of ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir seedlings: a summary of eight growing seasons. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 12: 69-73. [online] URL: http://www.in gentaconnect.com/content/saf/wjaf/1997/0000 0012/00000003/art00003
36. Rose R, Ketchum JS (2003) Interaction of initial seedling diameter, fertilization and weed control on Douglas-fir growth over the first four years after planting. Annals of Forest Science 60 (7): 625-635. - doi: 10.1051/forest: 2003055
37. Škorić A, Filipovski D, Cirić M (1985). Soil classification of Yugoslavia. ANUBiH, special edition -book LXXVIII, volume 13, Department for Natural and Mathematical Sciences, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, pp. 1-72.
38. South DB, Zwolinski JB (1997) Transplant stress index: a proposed method of quantifying planting check. New Forests 13 (1/3): 315-328. - doi: 10.1023/A: 1006546627342
39. South DB, Foster GS (1993). An experimental design for outplanting nursery trials on heterogeneous sites. South African Forestry Journal (165): 41-45. - doi: 10.1080/00382167.1993.9629 388
40. South DB, Harris SW, Barnett JP, Hainds MJ, Gjerstad DH (2005) Effect of container type and seedling size on survival and early height growth of Pinus palustris seedlings in Alabama, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 204: 385-398. - doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.09.016
41. South DB, Mexal JG (1984). Growing the "best" seedling for reforestation success. Forestry Departmental Series No. 12. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, AL, USA, pp. 11.
42. South DB, Rakestraw JL, Lowerts GA (2001) Early gains from planting large-diameter seedlings and intensive management are additive for loblolly pine. New Forests 22: 97-110. - doi: 10.1023/A: 1012097924355
43. Stewart JD, Bernier PY (1995) Gas exchange and water relations of 3 sizes of containerized Picea mariana seedlings subjected to atmospheric and edaphic water stress under controlled conditions. Annales des Sciences Forestieres 52 (1): 1-9. - doi: 10.1051/forest: 19950101
44. Stilinović S (1987). Seedling production of forest and decorative trees and shrubs. University of Belgrade, University book press, Belgrade, Serbia, pp. 455. [In Serbian]
45. Thompson BE (1985). Seedling morphological evaluation: what you can tell by looking. In:"Evaluating seedling quality: principles, procedures, and predictive ability of major tests" (Duryea ML ed). Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA, pp. 59-72.
46. Tsakaldimi M, Ganatsas P, Jacobs DF (2012) Prediction of planted seedling survival of five Mediterranean species based on initial seedling morphology. New Forests 44: 327-339. - doi: 10.1007/s11056-012-9339-3
47. Tuttle CL, South DB, Golden MS, Meldahl RS (1988) Initial Pinus taeda seedling height relationships with early survival and growth. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18: 867-871. - doi: 10.1139/x88-133
48. Van Den Driessche R (1991) Influence of container nursery regimes on drought resistance of seedlings following planting: survival and growth. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21: 555-565. - doi: 10.1139/x91-077
49. Ward JS, Gent MPN, Stevens GR (2000) Effects of planting stock quality and browse protection-type on height growth of northern red oak and eastern white pine. Forest Ecology and Management 127 (1-3): 205-216. - doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00132-2