Territorial vulnerability assessment frame in Colombia: Disaster risk management

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Volumn 21, Issue , 2017, Pages 384-395

  Villegas González, Paula Andrea ^a   Ramos Cañón, Alfonso Mariano ^b   González Méndez, Mauricio ^a   González Salazar, Ramón Eduardo ^b   De Plaza Solórzano, Juan Sebastian ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Indicators; Natural disasters; Resilience and stakeholders; Risk reduction; Vulnerability assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011711889     PISSN: 22124209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. [1] C. Álvarez, ‘La etnografía Como modelo de investigación en Educación’. Available from: (http://www.ugr.es/~pwlac/G24_10Carmen_Alvarez_Alvarez.html), 2008 (accessed 16.12.13).
2. [2] Alexander, E.D., Vulnerability. Alexander, E.D., Fairbridge, R.W., (eds.) Encyclopedia of environmental science, 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 663–664.
3. [3] Alexander, D.E., Natural Disasters. 1993, Springer, Netherlands (Retrieved from) (https://books.google.com.co/books?id=gWHsuGTcF34C).
4. [4] Aragón, E.A., Poveda, A.M., González, A.M., Estado del arte sobre Variables que han sido Utilizadas para Comparar el Impacto de Catástrofes Naturales en Colombia’. [State of the Art of Variables Used to Compare the Impact of Natural Disasters in Colombia.] Trabajo de grado Programa de Ingeniería Civil. 2012, Universidad Católica de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
5. [5] Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (IBD), Los riesgos De desastres Naturales continúan Altos en América Latina y el Caribe. [Risks of Natural Disasters Remain High in Latin America and the Caribbean]. Available from: (http://www.iadb.org/es/noticias/articulos/2010-09-30/desastres-naturales-en-america-latina-y-el-caribe-bid,8017.html), 2010. (accessed 27.04.12).
6. [6] Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., Wisner, B., At risk. Natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters. 1994, Routledge, London and New York, 284.
7. [7] Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., Wisner, B., At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters. 2014, Taylor & Francis Retrieved from (https://books.google.com.co/books?id=4M6AAgAAQBAJ).
8. [8] Botero, V., Geo-Information for Measuring Vulnerability to Earthquakes: a Fitness for Use Approach (Doctoral Thesis). 2009, International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, University of Ultrechet, Enschede, Holanda.
9. [9] Brans, J.-P., Mareschal, B., Promethee Methods. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, 2005, Springer New York, New York, NY, 163–186, 10.1007/0-387-23081-5_5.
10. [10] E.A. Bryant, L.M. Head, Planning for Natural Hazards — How Can We Mitigate the Impacts? Planning for Natural Hazards — How Can We Mitigate the Impacts?, February, 1–11, 2005.
11. [11] A. Calcatinge, The Need for a Cultural Landscape Theory: An Architect's Approach. Lit Verlag. Retrieved from (https://books.google.com.co/books?Id=pxMF6Unu3uAC), 2012.
12. [12] Cannon, T., A Hazard Need Not a Disaster Make: rural Vulnerability and the Causes of Natural Disasters. Merriman, P.A., Browitt, C.W., (eds.) Natural Disasters: Protecting Vulnerable Communities, 1991, Redwood Books, London, 3–6.
13. [13] CAPRA Probabilistic Risk Assessment Program, Metodología de Evaluación Probabilista de Riesgos Naturales. Available from: (http://www.ecapra.org/es/metodolog%C3%ADa-de-evaluaci%C3%B3n-probabilista-de-riesgos-naturales), 2011. (accessed 16.12.13).
14. [14] Cardona, O., Estimación Holística del riesgo sísmico utilizando sistemas dinámicos complejos(Tesis de doctorado). 2001, Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Cataluña.
15. [15] O. Cardona, La necesidad de repensar de manera holística los conceptos de vulnerabilidad y riesgo. Una crítica y una revisión necesaria para la gestión’. International Work Conference on Vulnerability in Disaster Theory and Practice. Disaster Studies of Wegeningen University and Research Centre. Wegeningen, Holand, 2001.
16. [16] Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), Manual para la Evaluación Del Impacto Socioeconómico y Ambiental de los Desastres. 2003, [Manual to Assess the Socioeconomic and Environmental Impact of Natural Disasters] Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, México.
17. [17] Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), Políticas Públicas para la Reducción de la Vulnerabilidad Frente a los Desastres Naturales y Socio-Naturales. 2005, [Public Policies to Reduce Vulnerability from Natural and Socio-Natural Disasters] SERIE Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo, Santiago de Chile.
18. [18] P.B. D'aquino, The Role Playing Games in an ABM participatory modeling process outcomes from five different experiments carried out in the last five years'. in: A.E. Rizzoli, A.J. Jakeman, (Eds.), Proceedings of the international environmental modelling and software society conference. Lugano, Switzerland, 24–27 June., 275–280, 2002.
19. [19] Departamento Nacional de Planeación (DNP), Orientaciones conceptuales y metodológicas para la formulación de visiones de desarrollo territorial. Bogotá D.C, 2010.
20. [20] Dirección de Gestión del Riesgo, Guía Municipal para la Gestión del Riesgo’ [Risk Management Municipal Guide] Available from: (http://www.sigpad.gov.co/sigpad/archivos/GMGRColombia.pdf). (accessed 16.06.14), 2010.
21. [21] Dooge, J., Water and ethics. Ethics of water-related disasters. 2004, UNESCO, Paris, 28.
22. [22] R.R. Dynes, B. De Marchi, C. Pelanda on Disasters, I. S. A. R. C, Sociology of Disasters: contribution of Sociology to Disaster Research, Disaster Research Center, 1987. (Retrieved from) (https://books.google.com.co/books?id=X8ConQEACAAJ).
23. [23] Dzurek, D.J., What makes territory important: tangible and intangible dimensions. GeoJournal 64:4 (2005), 263–274, 10.1007/s10708-005-5802-4.
24. [24] Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment’. U.S. Environmental protection agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC, EPA/630/R095/002F, 1998.
25. [25] ERN, CAPRA Probabilistic Risk Assessment Program. Available from: (http://www.ecapra.org). (accessed 26.01.14), 2008.
26. [26] Etienne, M.L., A step-by-step approach to building land management scenarios based on multiple viewpoints on multi-agent system simulations. Jasss. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 6(2), 2003.
27. [27] IFRC (2006) ‘¿Cómo se hace un AVC? Guía práctica para el Personal y los voluntarios de la Cruz Roja y de la Media Luna Roja’. [‘How Is a VCA Conducted? Practical Guide for Red Cross and Red Crescent Staff and Volunteers’.]. Available from: http://www.ifrc.org/Global/Publications/disasters/vca/how-to-do-vca-sp.pdf, 2006. (accessed: 26.01.14).
28. [28] Fiorino, D.J., Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: a Survey of Institutional Mechanisms. Source.: Sci., Technol., Hum. Values 15:2 (1990), 226–243, 10.1177/016224399001500204.
29. [29] Flores, A., Zizumbo, L., Cruz, G., Elva, V., Economía social, comunalidad: orientación teórica para el turismo rural, como alternativa de desarrollo. Rev. Mex. De. Cienc. Agric., 2014, 1645–1658.
30. [30] Foschiatti, A., ‘Aportes Conceptuales y Empíricos de la Vulnerabilidad Global. [Conceptual and Empirical Contributions to the Global Vulnerability]. 2009, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Chaco.
31. [31] R. García, Metodología de gestión de riesgos y catástrofes (Megerica)’ [Methodology for risk and disaster management (megerica)]. Available from: (http://www.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/PE/2013/11529a23.pdf), 2010. (accessed 16.12.13).
32. [32] A. Giddens, S. Griffiths, ‘Sociología’. [Sociology], 4th edition. Alianza. Madrid, 2007.
33. [33] T. Glade, Vulnerability assessment in landslide risk analysis. Die Erde. Vol. 134. No 2 (pp 123–146)INDECI (2006). Manual básico para la estimación del riesgo, 2003, pp. 73.
34. [34] Instituto Nacional de Defensa Civil (INDECI), Manual básico para la estimación del riesgo. 2006, [Basic manual to estimate risk] Instituto Nacional de Defensa Civil (INDECI) Dirección Nacional de Prevención (DINAPRE), 73.
35. [35] IPCC, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324), 2013.
36. [36] Korfmacher, K.S., The politics of participation in watershed modeling. Environ. Manag. 27:2 (2001), 161–176, 10.1007/s002670010141.
37. [37] Latta, A., Wittman, H., Environment and Citizenship in Latin America: natures, Subjects and Struggles. 2012, Berghahn Books (Retrieved from) (https://books.google.com.co/books?id=yPZWXzQe3XAC).
38. [38] A. Lavell, Viviendo en Riesgo. Comunidades Vulnerables y Prevención de Desastres en America Latina. [Living at Risk. Vulnerable Communities and Disaster Prevention in Latin America.] Editorial tercer mundo.s. 1, Red de Estudios Sociales en Prevención de Desastres en América Latina, 1997.
39. [39] A. Lavell, Sobre la Gestión del Riesgo: Apuntes hacía una Definición. [About Risk Management: Notes to a Definition] Editorial tercer mundo.s. 1, Red de Estudios Sociales en Prevención de Desastres en América Latina, 2001.
40. [40] M. Lindell, Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities. R. Perry, (Ed.). Thousand Oaks, California. (http://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229188), 2004.
41. [41] J. McBreen, Regional Assessment on Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction and Biodiversity in South America Regional Assessment on Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction and Biodiversity in South America, 2016.
42. [42] F. Mendoza, ‘Metodología: Indicadores de vulnerabilidad Ante fenómenos naturales para Centro America y República Dominicana, s.d. [Methodology: Vulnerability Indicators for Natural Phenomena in Central America and the Dominican Republic.]’. Available from: (http://www.preventionweb.net/english/professional/publications/v.php?Id=22970), 2011. (accessed 01.06.12).
43. [43] Montz, B.E., Tobin, G.A., Natural hazards: an evolving tradition in applied geography. Appl. Geogr. 31:1 (2011), 1–4, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.06.005.
44. [44] Naivinit, W.L., Participatory agent-based modelling and simulation of rice production and labor migrations in Northeast Thailand. Environ. Model. Softw. 25 (2010), 1345–1358.
45. [45] Oliver-Smith, A., Anthropological Research on Hazards and Disasters. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 25:1 (1996), 303–328, 10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.303.
46. [46] OPS, Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Mitigación de desastres naturales en sistemas de agua Potable y alcantarillado sanitario. Guías para el análisis de vulnerabilidad. [Pan American Health Organization. Mitigation of Natural Disasters in Potable Water and Sewage Systems. Vulnerability Assessment Guide]. Washington D.C, 1998.
47. [47] Oviedo, Álvaro, Memorias en crisoles: propuestas teóricas, metodológicas y estratégicas para los estudios de la memoria [Memories in pots: theoretical, methodological and strategic proposals for studies of memory]. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas. 2009, Centro de Memoria, Paz y Reconciliación Distrital, 97–110.
48. [48] Oliver-Smith, A., Anthropological Research on Hazards and Disasters'. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 25:1 (1996), 303–328, 10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.303.
49. [49] Pak, V., Designing and implementing a role-playing game: a tool to explain factors, decision making and landscape transformation. Environ. Model. Softw. 25 (2010), 1322–1333.
50. [50] M. Prieur, ‘Ethical Principles on Disaster Risk Reduction and People´s Resilience’ European and Mediterranean Major Hazards Agreement (EUR-OPA). Available from: (http://http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/majorhazards/ressources/pub/Ethical-Principles-Publication_EN.pdf), 2011. (accessed 11.06.14).
51. [51] Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD), Evaluación Del Riesgo de Desastres. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo. [Disaster risk assessment. United Nations Development Program.] New York, 2004.
52. [52] Regional Government of Cusco, Herramienta para Integrar la Reducción Del Riesgo en Desastres en Proyectos de Agua y Saneamiento Rura'l. [Tool to Integrate Risk Reduction in Disasters for Water and Rural Sanitation Projects]. 2011, Lucero S.A.C., Perú.
53. [53] Roy, B., Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples. RAIRO - Oper. Res. - Rech. Opérationnelle 2:V1 (1968), 57–75 (Retrieved from) (http://eudml.org/doc/104443).
54. [54] Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process: planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. 1980, McGraw-Hill, Bogotá, Colombia (Retrieved from) (https://books.google.com.co/books?id=Xxi7AAAAIAAJ).
55. [55] Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios (SSPD), Lineamientos para la Revisión de los Planes de Contingencia para la Sostenibilidad en la Prestación de los Servicios de Acueducto y Alcantarillado’ [Guidelines to revise contingency plans for a sustainable provision of water and sewage]. Available from: (http://superservicios.gov.co/home/web/guest/inicio), 2011. (accessed 01.06.12).
56. [56] Torres, S., Medellín, J., Villegas, P.A., Retrospectiva de las catástrofes naturales a nivel internacional. [International retrospective of natural disasters] Trabajo de grado Programa de Ingeniería Civil. 2011, Universidad Católica de Colombia.
57. [57] UNISDR, Vivir con el Riesgo: Informe mundial sobre iniciativas para la reducción de desastres [Living at Risk: World Report on Disaster Reduction Initiatives]. Available from: (http://www.eird.org/vivir-con-el-riesgo/capitulos/ch2-section3.pdf), 2013. (accessed 26.01.14).
58. [58] Voinov, A., Bousquet, F., Modelling with stakeholders. Environ. Model. Softw. 25:11 (2010), 1268–1281.
59. [59] Wisner, B., Luce, H.R., Disaster vulnerability: scale, power and daily life. GeoJournal 30 (1993), 127–140.
60. [60] T.P. Wagner L. Ortolano, Testing An Iterative, Open Process For Water Resources. U.S. Army Engineer Institute for Water Resources, IWR Contra (December), 1976.
61. [61] G. Wilches-Chaux, The global vulnerability, in: Y. Aysan, I. Davis, (eds.), Disasters and small dweling. Perspectives for the UN-IDNDR. Londres, pp. 30–35, 1992.