ACADEA-a decision support system for faculty performance reviews

Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 191-204

  Agrell, Per J ^a   Steuer, Ralph E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic research; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Efficiency analysis; Linear programming; Multi criteria decision analysis (MCDA)

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011659975     PISSN: 10579214     EISSN: 10991360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1099-1360(200009)9:5<191::AID-MCDA276>3.0.CO;2-5     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Agrell, PJ., Steuer, RE., 1998. Faculty performance measurement using data envelopment analysis. Working paper WP-246, Department of Production Economics, Linköping Institute of Technology, Sweden.
2. Agrell, PJ., Tind, J., 2000. A dual welcome to FDH in the DEA family. Journal of Productivity Analysis (forthcoming).
3. Ahn, TS., Charnes, A., Cooper, WW., 1988. Some statistical and DEA evaluations of relative efficiencies of public and private institutions of higher learning. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 22: 259-269.
4. Allen, RA., Athanassopoulos, A., Dyson, RG., Thanassoulis, E., 1997. Weight restriction and value judgements in DEA: evolution, development and future directions. Annals of Operations Research 73: 13-34.
5. Arnold, VL., Bardham, IR., Cooper, WW., Gallegos, A., 1997. Primal and dual optimality in computer codes using two-stage solution procedures in DEA. In Operations Research: Methods, Models and Applications, Aronson JE, Zionts S (eds). Quorum Books.
6. Banker, RD., Charnes, A., Cooper, WW., 1984. Some models for the estimation of technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30: 1078-1092.
7. Beasley, JE., 1990. Comparing university departments. Omega 18: 171-183.
8. Bessent, AM., Bessent, EW., Kennington, J., Regan, B., 1982. An application of mathematical programming to assess productivity in the Houston independent school district. Management Science 28: 1355-1367.
9. Bogetoft, P., 1994. Incentive efficient production frontiers: an agency perspective on DEA. Management Science 40: 959-968.
10. Bogetoft, P., 2000. DEA and activity planning under asymmetric information. Journal of Productivity Analysis 13: 7-48.
11. Cave, M., Hanney, S., Kogan, M., Trevet, G., 1988. The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis of Developing Practice (2nd edn). Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd: London.
12. Charnes, A., Cooper, WW., Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2: 429-444.
13. Chilingerian, JA., 1995. Evaluating physician efficiency in hospitals: a multivariate analysis of best practice. European Journal of Operational Research 80: 548-574.
14. Halme, M., Joro, T., Korhonen, P., Salo, S., Wallenius, J., 1999. A value efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 45: 103-115.
15. Joro, T., Korhonen, P., Wallenius, J., 1997. Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming. Management Science 44: 962-970.
16. Korhonen, P., Tainio, R., Wallenius, J., 1998. Value efficiency analysis of academic research. Interim Report IR-98-32 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
17. Lootsma, FA., Bots, PWG., 1999. The assignment of scores for output-based research funding. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 8: 44-50.
18. Sarafoglou, N., Haynes, KE., 1996. University productivity in Sweden: a demonstration and explantory analysis for economics and business programs. Annals of Regional Science 30: 285-304.
19. Seiford, LM., 1996. Data envelopment analysis: the evolution of the state of the art (1978-1995). Journal of Productivity Analysis 7: 99-137.
20. Thanassoulis, E., Allen, R., 1998. Simulating weights restriction in data envelopment analysis by means of unobserved DMUs. Management Science 44: 586-594.
21. Thanassoulis, E., Dunstan, P., 1994. Guiding schools to improved performance using data envelopment analysis-an illustration with data from a local education authority. Journal of the Operational Research Society 45: 1247-1262.
22. Thompson, RG., Langemeier, LN., Lee, CH., Thrall, RM., 1990. The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. Journal of Econometrics 46: 93-108.
23. Tomkins, C., Green, R., 1988. An experiment in the use of data envelopment analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting. Financial Accountability Management 4: 147-164.