Advertising, big data, and the clearance of the public realm: Marketers' new approaches to the content subsidy

International Journal of Communication

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1710-1726

  Couldry, Nick ^a   Turow, Joseph ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011627927     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19328036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
2. Bennett, L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707-731.
3. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2011, September 21). Six provocations for big data. Paper presented at A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford, UK. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1926431
5. Couldry, N. (2003). Media rituals: A critical approach. London, UK: Routledge.
6. Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. London, UK: Polity.
7. Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8. Dahlgren, P. (1995). Television and the public sphere. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
9. Davies, N. (2007). Flat earth news. London, UK: Chatto and Windus.
10. Deuze, M. (2012). Media life. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
11. DVorkin, L. (2013, July 8). Inside Forbes: What's next for native ads? Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/lewisdvorkin/2013/07/08/inside-forbes-whats-next-for-native-ads-controversy-gives-way-to-market-realities
12. Gerbner, G. (1972-1973). Teacher image and the hidden curriculum. American Scholar, 42, 66-92.
13. Gitlin, T. (1998). Public sphere or public sphericules? In T. Liebes & J. Curran (Eds.), Media ritual and identity (pp. 168-174). London, UK: Routledge.
14. Honneth, A. (2007). Disrespect. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
15. Ives, N. (2010, August 23). The ad/edit wall worn down to a warning track. Advertising Age. Retrieved from http://adage.com/article/media/advertising-ad-edit-teams-navigate-business-reality/145501
16. Ingram, M. (2013, January 22). If Twitter wants to be a media company, it needs to get better at relevance. Retrieved from http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/22/if-twitter-wants-to-be-a-media-company-it-needs-to-get-a-lot-better-at-relevance
17. Jamieson, K., & Cappella, J. (2010). Echo chamber. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18. Katz, E. (1996). And deliver us from segmentation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 22-33.
19. Mansell, R. (2012). Imagining the internet. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20. Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London, UK: Verso.
21. Nir, L. (2012). Public space: How shared news landscapes close gaps in political engagement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 578-596.
22. Paine, T. (1937). The rights of man. London, UK: Watts. (Original work published 1791)
23. Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
24. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble. New York, NY: Penguin.
25. Prebble, J. (1969). The highland clearances. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
26. Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. RECMA. (2010). The RECMA global reports. Retrieved from http://www.recma.com
28. Rosanvallon, P. (2006). Democracy past and future. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
29. Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Rosanvallon, P. (2011). Democratic legitimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. Scannell, P. (1989). Public service broadcasting and modern public life. Media, Culture & Society, 11, 135-166.
32. Schattschneider, O. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America. New York, NY: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
33. Smith, S. (2012a, December 28). Verklin: Yep, it's still about data. Data and Targeting Insider. Retrieved from http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/190043/verklin-yep-its-still-about-data.html
34. Smith, S. (2012b, December 21). You need a weatherman to know which way the data flows. Data and
35. Targeting Insider. Retrieved from http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/189909/you-need-a-weatherman-to-know-which-way-the-data-f.html
36. Social Seed. (2013). Case studies. Retrieved from http://social-seed.com/Case-Studies.html
37. Stelter, B., & Haughney, C. (2013, January 15). The Atlantic apologizes for Scientology ad. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/15/the-atlantic-apologizes-for-scientology-ad
38. Streeter, T. (2011). The net effect. New York, NY: New York University Press.
39. Sunstein, C. (2006). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40. Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. Touraine, A. (1977). The self-production of society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42. Turner, G. (2010). Ordinary people and the media. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
43. Turow, J. (1997). Breaking up America: Advertisers and the new media world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44. Turow, J. (2006). Niche envy: Marketing discrimination in the digital age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Turow, J. (2011). The daily you: How the new advertising industry is defining your identity and your worth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46. Turow, J., Delli Carpini, M, Draper, N., & Howard-Williams, R. (2012, July). Americans roundly reject tailored political advertising-At a time when political campaigns are embracing it. Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/business/24adco.pdf
47. Williams, B., & Delli Carpini, M. (2011). After broadcast news. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.