Teaching the post‐modern rhetor continuing the conversation on rhetorical agency

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 107-113

  Geisler, Cheryl ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011526499     PISSN: 02773945     EISSN: 1930322X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02773940509391324     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Crowley, Sharon. “Communications Skills and a Brief Rapprochement of Rhetoricians.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 34(1): 89-104.
2. Gaonkar, Dilip. “The Idea of Rhetoric in the Rhetoric of Science.” Southern Communication Journal 58(4): 258-295.
3. Geisler, Cheryl. “How Ought We to Understand the Concept of Rhetorical Agency? Report from the ARS.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 34(3): 9-18.
4. Geisler, Cheryl. Academic Literacy and the Nature of Expertise: Reading, Writing, and Knowing in Academic Philosophy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994.
5. Harper, Richard H. R. Inside the IMF. San Diego; Academic Press, 1998.
6. Leff, Michael, and Andrea A Lunsford. “Afterwords: A Dialogue.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 34(3): 55-68.
7. Spilka, R. (1990). “Orality and Literacy in the Workplace: Process- and Text- based Strategies for Multiple Audience Adaptation.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 4(1): 44-67.