Gerontology program development: The power of persistence or an exercise in alienation

Gerontology and Geriatrics Education

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 45-57

  Alemán, Sara ^a   Luken, Paul ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY WEST   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011501165     PISSN: 02701960     EISSN: 15453847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J021v17n04_05     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alemán S. & Luken, P.C. (1994). Toward the development of an inter-unit curriculum in gerontology: A report. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona State University West.
2. Arizona State University West. (1988). Visions of the future. Phoenix, AZ: Author.
3. Arizona State University West. (1990). Five year plan: 1990/91-1994/95. Phoenix, AZ: Author.
4. Arizona State University West. (1991). Five year plan: 1992-96. Phoenix, AZ: Author.
5. Arizona State University West Institutional Planning and Research. (1996). Enrollment and student characteristic: Summary abstract Fall 1995. Phoenix, AZ: Author.
6. Callan, J. A. (1992). Gerontology advisory committee final report. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona State University West.
7. Cameron, K. S. & Whetten, D. A. (1983). Models of the organizational life cycle: Applications to higher education. Review of Higher Education, 6 (4), 269-299.
8. Connelly, J. R. & Rich, T. A. (Eds.). (1989). AGHE Standards and Guidelines for Gerontology Programs. Washington, DC: Association for Gerontology in Higher Education.
9. Davis, F. (1963). Passage through crisis. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Company.
10. Dodge, H.R. & Robbins, J. E. (1992). An empirical investigation of the organizational life cycle model for small business development and survival. Journal of Small Business Management, 30 (1), 27-37.
11. Fischer, D. H. (1970). Historian’s fallacies: Toward a logic of historical thought. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
12. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Kazanjian, R. K. (1983). The organizational evolution of high technology ventures: The impact of stage of growth on the nature of structure and the planning process. PhD dissertation, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PA.
14. Kazanjian, R. K. (1988). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 31 (2), 257-279.
15. Kazanjian, R. K. & Drazin, R. (1989). Art empirical test of a stage of growth progression model. Management Review, 35 (12), 1489-1503.
16. Lacoursiere, R. B. (1980). The life cycle of groups. New York: Human Sciences Press.
17. Luken, P.C. (1982). Organizational emergence: A case study of a mental health office. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.
18. Miller, D. & Friesen, P. H. (1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Science, 30 (10), 1161-1183.
19. Morrissey, S., Moore, S., Cox, G., Queiro-Tajalli, I. & Martz, B. L. (1990). Building interdisciplinary teams in gerontological education. Educational Gerontology, 15 (4), 385-394.
20. Olson, P. D. & Terpstra, D. E. (1992). Organizational Structural Changes: Life-cycle stage influences and managers’ and interventionists’ challenges. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 5 (4), 27-40.
21. Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational lifecycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29 (1), 33-51.
22. Torbert, W. R. (1974/75). Pre-Bureaucratic and post-bureaucratic stages of organization development. Interpersonal Development, 5, 1-25.
23. Whetten, D. A. (1987). Organizational growth and decline processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 335-358.