Creating a research literacy course for education doctoral students: Design issues and political realities of developing online and face-to-face instruction

Journal of Library Administration

Volumn 37, Issue 3-4, 2002, Pages 515-527

  Tuñón, Johanna ^a  

^a NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Course development; Distance learners; Library instruction; Literacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011485082     PISSN: 01930826     EISSN: 15403564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J111v37n03_42     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bren, B., Hillenamm, B., & Topp, V. (1998). Effectiveness of hands-on instruction of electronic resources. Research Strategies, 16,41-51.
2. Cud her, S., & Hannon, A. R. (2000). An active learning approach to teaching effective online search strategies: a librarian/faculty collaboration. T.H.E. Journal, 28(5), 52-57.&Retrieved November 18,2001, from Wilson Web Education Full Text database.
3. Dunigan, J., & Thompson, J. C., Jr. (1998). Using technology to make a difference: Engaging student in active learning. T.H.E. Journal, 25(4), 30. Retrieved November 13,2001, from ProQuest Research Library Periodicals database.
4. Germain, C. A., Jacobson, T. E., & Kaczor, S. A (2000, January). A comparison of the effectiveness of presentation formats for instruction: Teaching first-year students.&College and Research libraries, 65-72.
5. Mehlenbacher, B., Miller, C. R., Covington, D., & Larsen, J. S. (2000). Active and interactive learning online: A comparison of Web-based and conventional writing classes. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(2), 166-184.
6. Morner, C. J. (1993). A test of library research skills for education doctoral students (Doctoral dissertation, Boston College, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(06), 2070A.
7. Momer, C. J. (1995). Measuring the library research skills of education doctoral students. In R. AmRhein (Ed.), Continuity and transformation: The promise of confluence. Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference of the Association of College and Research libraries, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, March 19-April 1, 1995 (pp. 1361-1391).&Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.
8. O’Hanlon, N. (2000). Ohio State University Libraries’ net.TUTOR project. Research Strategies, 17,207-214.
9. Pival, P., & Tunon, J. (1998). NetMeeting: Anew and inexpensive alternative for delivering library instruction to distance students. College & Research Library News, 59, 758-760.
10. Pival, P., & Tunon, J. (2000). Innovative methods for providing instruction to distance students using technology. In P. S. Thomas (Compiler), The Ninth Off-Campus library Services Conference proceedings (pp. 221-230). Mount Pleasant, MI: Central&Michigan University Press.
11. Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (1997). SACS report. Unpublished manuscript.
12. Tunon, J. (1999). Integrating bibliographic instruction for distance education doctoral students in the Child and Youth Studies Program at Nova Southeastern University.&Unpublished doctoral practicum, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale,&FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED440639).
13. Tunon, J. (1999, June 7). Asynchronous/distance instruction: A case study of the MBA at NSU. Special Library Association Conference in Minneapolis, MN, on June 7,&1999.
14. Tunon, J. “Collaborating on Web-based instruction for MBA students at Nova Southeastern University.” Tunon, J., &c Pival, P. (1997). Library services to distance students: Nova Southeastern University’s experience. Florida Libraries, 40,109-118.