The beginning of wisdom

Antiquity

Volumn 72, Issue 277, 1998, Pages 680-686

  Pearson, M Parker ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011485057     PISSN: 0003598X     EISSN: 17451744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X0008710X     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andah, B. 1995. European encumbrances to the development of relevant theory in African archaeology, in Uck, P.J. (ed.), Theory in archaeology: a world perspective: 96–109. London: Routledge.
2. Bender, B. 1998. Stonehenge: making space. Oxford: Berg.
3. Bettinger, R.L. 1991. Hunter-gatherers: archaeological and evolutionary theory. New York (NY): Plenum Press.
4. Boast, R. 1995. Fine pots, pure pots, beaker pots, in Kinnes & Vamdell (ed.): 69–80.
5. Case, H. 1995. Beakers: loosening a stereotype, in Kinnes & Vamdell (ed.): 55–67.
6. Chadwick, A. 1998. Archaeology at the edge of chaos: further towards reflexive excavation methodologies, Assemblage: the Sheffield Graduate Journal of Archaeology 3 http://www.shef.ac.Uk/~assem/3/3chad.htm
7. Clarke, D.L. 1968. Analytical archaeology. London: Methuen.
8. Clarke, D.L. 1970. Beaker pottery of Great Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Clarke, D.L. 1972. A provisional model of an Iron Age society and its settlement system, in Clark, D.L. (ed.), Models in archaeology: 801–69. London: Methuen.
10. Clarke, D.L. 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence, Antiquity. 47: 6–18.
11. Clarke, D.L. 1976. The Beaker network, in Lantin, J.N. & der Waals va, J. (ed.), Glockenbechersymposion, Oberried 1974: 459–76. Bussum/Haarlem: Fibula-Van Dishoeck.
12. Coles, J.M. & Minnitt, S. 1995. Industrious and fairly civilized: the Glastonbury lake village. Taunton: Somerset Levels Project & Somerset County Council Museums Service.
13. De Man, P. 1978. Foreword, in Jacobs, C. The dissimulating harmony. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. Flannery, K.V. 1982. The golden Marshalltown: a parable for the archeology of the 1980s, American Anthropologist. 84: 265–78.
15. Gellner, E. 1995. Interpretive anthropology, in Hodder et al. (ed.): 48–50.
16. Geras, N. 1990. Discourses of extremity: radical ethics and post-Marxist extravagances. London: Verso.
17. Haskell, T. 1990. Objectivity is not neutrality: rhetoric vs. Practice in Peter Novick’s That noble dream, History and Theory. 29: 129–57.
18. Hassan, F.A. 1997. Beyond the surface: comments on Hodder’s ‘reflexive excavation methodology’, Antiquity. 71: 1020–25.
19. Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Hodder, I. 1997. ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible’: towards a reflexive excavation methodology, Antiquity. 71: 691–700.
21. Hodder, I. & Shanks, M. 1995. Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies, in Hodder et al. (ed.): 3–29.
22. Hodder, I., Shanks, M., Alexandri, A., Buchli, V., Carman, J., Last, J. & Luca, G. (ed.). 1995. Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge.
23. Jenkins, K. 1995. On ‘What is history?’: from Carr and Elton to Rorty and White. London: Routledge.
24. Kinnes, I. & Varndel, G. (ed.). 1995. ‘Unbaked urns of rudely shape’: essays on British and Irish pottery for Ian Longworth. Oxford: Oxbow.
25. Kinnes, I., Gibson, A., Ambers, J., Leese, M. & Boast, R. 1991. Radiocarbon dating and British beakers, Scottish Archaeological Review. 8: 35–68.
26. Lyotard, F. 1979. La condition postmoderne: rapport sur savoir. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
27. Moore, H. 1995. The problems of origins: poststructuralism and beyond, in Hodder et al. (ed.): 51–3.
28. Moreland, J. In press a. The Middle Ages, theory and postmodernism, Acta Archaeologica 68.
29. Moreland, J. In press b. Through the looking glass of possibilities: understanding the Middle Ages, Veroffentlichungen des Instituts für Reanenkunde des Mittelalters und der Frühen Neuzeit.
30. Norris, C. 1990. What’s wrong with postmodernism: critical theory and the ends of philosophy. London: Harvester.
31. Norris, C. 1993. The truth about postmodernism. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Ricoeur, P. 1989. Time and narrative 3. (Trans. McLaughli, K. & Pellauer, D.) Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press.
33. Rorty, R. 1982. Consequences of pragmatism (essays: 1972–1980). Brighton: Harvester.
34. Rorty, R. 1991. Objectivity, relativism, and truth: philosophical papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Shanks, M. & Tilley, C. 1987a. Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Shanks, M. & Tilley, C. 1987b. Social theory and archaeology. Oxford: Polity Press.
37. Shanks, M. & Tilley, C. 1989. Archaeology into the 1990s. Norwegian Archaeoiogical Review. 22: 1–12.
38. Sullivan, D.P. 1997. Review of Parke Pearson, M. & Richard, C. (ed.), Architecture and order, The Ley Hunter. 129: 40.
39. Tilley, C. 1989. Excavation as theatre, Antiquity. 63: 275–80.
40. Trigger, B. 1989. Hyperrelativism, responsibility and the social sciences, Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. 26: 776–97.
41. Webb, S. 1987. Reburying Australian skeletons, Antiquity. 61: 292–6.
42. Zagorin, P. 1990. Historiography and postmodernism: reconsiderations, History and Theory. 29: 263–74.
43. Zimmerman, L. 1989. Made radical by my own: an archaeologist learns to accept reburial, in Layto, R. (ed.), Conflict in the archaeology of living traditions: 60–67. London: Unwin Hyman.