An overview of performance measures in higher education and libraries

Journal of Library Administration

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 7-18

  Kyrillidou, Martha ^a  

^a ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011480449     PISSN: 01930826     EISSN: 15403564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J111v35n04_03     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Peter Schmidt, “Rancor and Confusion Greet a Change in South Carolina’s Budgeting System,” The Chronicle of Higher Education (4 Apr. 1997): A26.
2. Ian Winkworth’s, “Performance Indicators,” in Librarianship and Information Work Worldwide (Graham McKenzie and Ray Prychirch, eds., London: Bower Saur, 1993: 171-191).
3. Gerald Gaither, Brian P. Nedwek, and John E. Neal, Measuring Up: The Promises and Pitfalls of Performance Indicators in Higher Education, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5 (Washington, DC: George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development, 1994), 5.
4. America’s Best Colleges (Washington, DC: U.S. News & World Report, 1996), 11.
5. Michael G. Dolence and Donald M. Norris, Transforming Higher Education: A Vision for Learning in the 21st Century (Ann Arbor, MI: Society for College and University Planning, 1995): 22.
6. Anthony M. et al., University Libraries and Scholarly Communication (Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 1992).
7. Roswintha Poll and Peter te Boekhorst, Measuring Quality: International Guidelines for Performance Measurement in Academic Libraries (London: K.G. Saur, 1996).
8. GraceAnne A. DeCandido, After the User Survey, What Then? ARL SPEC Kit226 (Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 1997).
9. Timothy D. Jewell, “Recent Trends in ARL Electronic and Access Services Data,” a report submitted to the Association of Research Libraries, 1997. Available at: http://www.arl.org/stats/specproj/etrends.htm.