The meaning of a precedent

Legal Theory

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 185-240

  Levenbook, Barbara Baum ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011471275     PISSN: 13523252     EISSN: 14698048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s1352325200062030     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Allen, C.K. 1964. Law in the Making. 7th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. Ashley, K.D. 1988. Arguing by Analogy in Law: A Case-Based Model. In Analogical Reasoning, ed. David H. Helman, 205-24. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Atiyah, P.S. and R.S. Summers. 1987. Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Benditt, Theodore. 1987. The Rule of Precedent. In Precedent in Law, ed. Laurence Goldstein, 89-106. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. Bix, Brian. 1993. Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6. Black, Henry Campbell. 1912. Handbook on the Law of Judicial Precedents; or The Science of Case Law. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co.
7. Black, Max. 1962. Models and Metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
8. Boswell, James. 1980. Life of Johnson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Cardozo, Benjamin N. 1921. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.
10. Cross, Rupert. 1977. Precedent in English Law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. Duff, R.A. 1996. Criminal Attempts. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12. Dworkin, Ronald. 1977a. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
13. —--.1977b. Seven Critics. Georgia Law Review 11: 1201-67.
14. —--.1986. Law's Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
15. Fitzgerald, P.J. 1966. Salmond on Jurisprudence. 12th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
16. Friday, Nancy. 1977. My Mother, My Self. New York: Dell.
17. Frug, Mary Joe. 1992. Postmodern Legal Feminism. New York: Routledge.
18. Fuller, Lon L. 1958. Positivism and Fidelity to Law-A Reply to Professor Hart. Harvard Law Review 71:661-69.
19. —--.1968. Anatomy of the Law. New York: New American Library.
20. —--.1969. The Morality of Law, revised edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
21. —--.1981. Human Interaction and the Law. Reprinted in The Principles of Social
22. Order, ed. Kenneth I. Winston, 211-46. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
23. Golding, Martin P. 1984. Legal Reasoning. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
24. Goodhardt, A.L. 1959. The Ratio Decidendi of a Case. The Modern Law Review 22: 117-24.
25. Hart, H.L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
26. Hodson, John D. 1976. Hart on the Internal Aspect of Rules. Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie 62: 381-99.
27. Holmes, OliverWendell. 1897. The Path of the Law. Harvard Law Review 10: 455-78.
28. Kasl, Charlotte Davis. 1989. Women, Sex, and Addiction. New York: Harper and Row.
29. Kripke, Saul. 1982. Wittgenstein: On Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
30. Lagerspetz, Eerik. 1989. A Conventionalist Theory of Institutions. Vol. 44. Helsinki: Acta Philosophica Fennica.
31. Levi, Edward H. 1961. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Lewis, David K. 1969. Convention: a Philosophical Study. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
33. Llewellyn, Karl N. 1960. The Bramble Bush. New York: Oceana Publications.
34. MacCormick, Neil. 1978. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
35. MacKinnon, Catherine A. 1987. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
36. Malcolm, Norman. 1967. Article on Ludwig Wittgenstein. In vol. 8 of The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Paul Edwards, 327-40. New York: Collier Macmillan.
37. Marmor, Andrei. 1992. Interpretation and Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
38. McDowell, John. 1981. Non-Cognitivism and Rule-Following. In Wittgenstein: to Follow a Rule, ed. Steven H. Holtzman and Christopher M. Leich, 141-62. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
39. Montrose, J.L. 1956. Judicial Law Making and Law Applying. Butterworths South African Law Review 3: 187-205.
40. —--.1957. The Ratio Decidendi of a Case. The Modern Law Review 20: 587-95.
41. Moore, Michael S. 1987. Precedent, Induction, and Ethical Generalization. In Precedent in Law, ed. Laurence Goldstein, 183-216. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
42. Patterson, Dennis M. 1992. Law's Pragmatism: Law as Practice and Narrative. Reprinted in Wittgenstein and Legal Theory, ed. Dennis M. Patterson, 85-121. Boulder: Westview Press.
43. Postema, Gerald J. 1987a. Some Roots of our Notion of Precedent. In Precedent in Law, ed. Laurence Goldstein, 9-33. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
44. —--.1987b. “Protestant” Interpretation and Social Practices. Law and Philosophy 6: 283-319.
45. —--.1994. Implicit Law. Law and Philosophy 13: 361-87. Pound, Roscoe. 1954. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
46. Radin, Max. 1933. Case Law and Stare Decisis: Concerning Prajudizienrecht in Amerika. Columbia Law Review 33: 199-212.
47. Raz, Joseph. 1979. The Authority of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
48. —--.1992. The Relevance of Coherence. Boston University Law Review 72: 273-321.
49. —--.1995. Interpretation Without Retrieval. In Law and Interpretation, ed. Andrei Marmor. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
50. —--.1996. Intention in Interpretation. In The Autonomy of Law, ed. Robert P. George, 249-86. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
51. Regan, Donald. 1989. Authority and Value: Reflections on Raz's Morality of Freedom. Southern California Law Review 62: 995-1095.
52. Sartorius, Rolf. 1967. The Doctrine of Precedent and the Problem of Relevance. Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie 53: 343-66.
53. Schauer, Frederick. 1987. Precedent. Stanford Law Review 39: 571-605.
54. —--.1991. Playing by the Rules. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
55. Scheppele, Kim Lane. 1988. Legal Secrets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. —--.1991. Facing Facts in Legal Interpretation. In Law and the Order of Culture, ed. Robert Post, 42-77. Berkeley: University of California Press.
57. Simpson, A.W.B. 1961. The Ratio Decidendi of a Case and the Doctrine of Binding Precedent. In Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, ed. A.G. Guest, 148-75. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
58. Stone, Julius. 1950. The Province and Function of Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
59. —--.1964. Legal System and Lawyers’ Reasonings. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
60. Twining, William and David Miers. 1976. How to Do Things With Rules. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
61. Vlk, Suzee. 1994. The SAT I For Dummies. Foster City, California: IDG Books. Wasserstrom, Richard A. 1981. The Judicial Decision. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
62. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.