Political representation and the normative logic of two-level games

European Political Science Review

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 63-81

  Savage, Deborah ^a   Weale, Albert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

accountability; international negotiations; representation; two level games

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011458742     PISSN: 17557739     EISSN: 17557747     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1755773909000046     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Allison G., Zelikow P. (1999), Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, 2nd edn., New York: Longman.
2. Barry B. (1989), Theories of Justice, London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
3. Bovens M. (2007a), ‘Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework’, European Law Journal 13(4): 447–468.
4. Bovens M. (2007b), ‘New forms of accountability and EU-governance’, Comparative European Politics 5(1): 104–120.
5. Castiglione D. (2007), ‘Accountability’, in M. Bevir (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Governance, Vol. 1, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1–7.
6. Deitelhoff N., Müller H. (2005), ‘Theoretical paradise – empirically lost? Arguing with Habermas’, Review of International Studies 31: 167–179.
7. Eichengreen B., Uzan M. (1993), ‘The 1933 World Economic Conference as an instance of failed international cooperation’, in P.B. Evans, H.K. Jacobson and R.D. Putnam (eds), Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, pp. 171–206.
8. Evans P.B., Jacobson H.K., Putnam R.D. (eds) (1993), Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
9. Grant R.W., Keohane R.G. (2005), ‘Accountability and abuses of power in world politics’, American Political Science Review 99(1): 29–43.
10. Gutmann A., Thompson D. (2004), Why Deliberative Democracy?, Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
11. Habermas J. (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action, London: Heinemann (translated by T. McCarthy).
12. Habermas J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge: Polity Press (translated by W. Rehg).
13. Hicks J.R. (1939), ‘The foundations of welfare economics’, Economic Journal 49: 696–712.
14. Hicks J.R. (1941), ‘The rehabilitation of consumers’ surplus’, Review of Economic Studies 8: 108–116.
15. Hobbes T. (1651), Leviathan edited with an introduction by M. Oakeshott, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, n.d.
16. Horndijk L. (1991), ‘Integrated environmental economic systems’, in J.B. Opschoor and D.W. Pearce (eds), Persistent Pollutants, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 105–114.
17. Joerges C., Neyer J. (1997), ‘Transforming strategic interaction into deliberative problem-solving: European comitology in the foodstuffs sector’, Journal of European Public Policy 4(4): 609–625.
18. Kaldor N. (1939), ‘Welfare propositions of economics and inter-personal comparisons of utility’, Economic Journal 49: 549–552.
19. Krasner S.D. (1999), Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Levy M.A., Young O.R., Zürn M. (1995), ‘The study of international regimes’, European Journal of International Relations 1: 267–330.
21. Lloyd Thomas D.A. (1969), ‘Review of Hanna Fenichel Pitkin’, The Concept of Representation, Philosophical Quarterly 19(75): 186–187.
22. MacCormick N. (1999), Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State, and Nation in the European Commonwealth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Moravcsik A. (1998), The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, London, New York: Routledge.
24. Munton D., Soroos M., Nikita E., Levy M.A. (1999), ‘Acid rain in Europe and North America’, in O.R. Young (ed.), The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms, Cambridge, MA, London, England: The MIT Press, pp. 155–247.
25. Niemann A. (2004), ‘Between communicative action and strategic action: the Article 113 Committee and the negotiations on the WTO Basic Telecommunications Services Agreement’, Journal of European Public Policy 11(3): 379–407.
26. Olson M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Panke D. (2006), ‘More arguing than bargaining? The institutional designs of the European convention and intergovernmental conferences compared’, European Integration 28(4): 357–379.
28. Pitkin H. (1967), The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.
29. Pogge T.W. (2003), ‘The influence of the global order on the prospects for genuine democracy in developing countries’, in D. Archibugi (ed.), Debating Cosmopolitics, London, New York: Verso, pp. 117–140.
30. Pollack M.A. (2001), ‘International relations theory and European integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39(2): 221–244.
31. Popper K.R. (1945), The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vols. 1 and 2. London: Routledge, Kegan Paul.
32. Putnam R.D. (1988), ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games’, International Organization 42(3): 427–460.
33. Rawls J. (1996), Political Liberalism, revised edn., New York: Columbia University Press.
34. Rawls J. (1999), The Law of Peoples, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Rehfeld A. (2005), The Concept of Constituency, New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Rehfeld A. (2006), ‘Towards a general theory of political representation’, The Journal of Politics 68(1): 1–22.
37. Risse T. (2000), ‘ “Let's Argue!”: communicative action in world politics’, International Organization 54(1): 1–39.
38. Savage D., Weale A. (2006), ‘The normative logic of two-level games and the European Union’, NewGov New Modes of Governance Project http://www.eu-newgov.org/database/DELIV/DDTFD04_Normative_Logic_of_Two-Level_Games_and_the_EU.pdf
39. Saward M. (2006), ‘The representative claim’, Contemporary Political Theory 5: 297–318.
40. Sidgwick H. (1891), The Elements of Politics, London: Macmillan.
41. Sidgwick H. (1901), The Methods of Ethics, 6th edn., London: Macmillan.
42. Underdal A. (2000), ‘Comparative analysis: accounting for variance in actor behaviour’, in A. Underdal and K. Hanf (eds), International Environmental Agreements and Domestic Politics, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 341–384.
43. Weale A. (1992), The New Politics of Pollution, Manchester, New York: Manchester University Press.
44. Weale A. (1998), ‘From contracts to pluralism?’, in P. Kelly (ed.), Impartiality, Neutrality and Justice: Re-reading Brian Barry's Justice as Impartiality, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 9–34.
45. Weale A. (2007), Democracy, 2nd edn., Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
46. Young O. (1989), International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
47. Young O.R. (1999), ‘Regime effectiveness: taking stock’, in O.R. Young (ed.), The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms, Cambridge, MA, London, England: The MIT Press, pp. 249–279.
48. Young O., Levy M.A. (1999), ‘The effectiveness of international environmental regimes’, in O.R. Young (ed.), The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms, Cambridge, MA, London, England: The MIT Press, pp. 1–32.