Putting European political science back together again

European Political Science Review

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 297-316

  Keating, Michael ^a  

^a EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

epistemology; interpretive approaches; political science

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011457838     PISSN: 17557739     EISSN: 17557747     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1755773909990087     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abélès M. (1989), Jours tranquilles en 89: ethnologie politique d'un département français, Paris: Editions O. Jacob.
2. Adams J., Clemens E.S., Orloff A.S. (eds) (2004), ‘Introduction: social theory, modernity, and the three waves of historical sociology’, in Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 1–74.
3. Almond G.A., Verba S. (eds) (1980), The Civic Culture Revisited, Boston: Little, Brown.
4. Bache I., Flinders M. (eds) (2004), ‘Multi-level governance: conclusions and implications’, in Multi-level Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 200–207.
5. Banting K., Kymlicka W. (eds) (2007), Multiculturalism and the Welfare State, Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Bartolini S. (2006), Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Structuring between the Nation State and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Bauböck R. (2008), ‘Normative political theory and empirical research’, in D. della Porta and M. Keating (eds), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 40–60.
8. Bevir M. (2000), ‘On tradition’, Humanitas 13: 28–53.
9. Bevir M. (2008), ‘Metamethodology: clearing the underbrush’, in J. Box-Steffensmeier, H. Brady and D. Collier (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 48–70.
10. Bevir M., Rhodes R.A.W. (2003), Interpreting British Governance, London: Routledge.
11. Bevir M., Rhodes R.A.W. (2006), Governance Stories, London: Routledge.
12. Bhaskar R. (2002), Reflections on Meta-reality: Transcendence, Emancipation and Everyday Life, New Delhi and London: Sage.
13. Brady H.E., Collier D. (eds) (2004), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
14. Braudel F. (1986), L'identité de la France, Paris: Arthaud.
15. Bray Z. (2008), ‘Ethnographic approaches’, in D. della Porta and M. Keating (eds), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 296–315.
16. Coleman J. (1988), ‘social capital in the creation of human capital’, American Journal of Sociology 94(Suppl): 95–120.
17. Delanty G. (1999), Social Theory in a Changing World, Cambridge: Polity.
18. Erne R. (2007), ‘On the use and abuse of bibliometric performance indicators: a critique of Hix's “global ranking of political science departments” ’, European Political Science 6(3): 306–314.
19. Ferguson A. (1966), An Essay on the History of Civil Society, 1767, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
20. Ferguson Y.H., Mansbach R.W. (1996), Polities: Authority, Identities, and Change, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
21. Flyvbjerg B. (2001), Making Social Science Matter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Franzese R. (2003), ‘Quantitative empirical methods and context conditionality’, APSA-CP Newsletter 14(1): 20–24.
23. Fukuyama F. (1992), The End of History and the Last Man, New York: Free Press.
24. Fulbrook M. (2006), ‘Why historical accounts are inevitably theoretical; but why some accounts are preferable to others’, in A.L. Macfie (ed.), The Philosophy of History, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 201–202.
25. Geertz C. (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.
26. George A.L., Bennet A. (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Giddens A. (1976), The New Rules of Sociological Method, London: Hutchison.
28. Grofman B. (2007), ‘Toward a science of politics?’, European Political Science 6(2): 143–155.
29. Hacking I. (1999), The social construction of what?, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Hall P.A., Taylor R.C.R. (1996), ‘Political science and the three new institutionalisms’, Political Studies 44(5): 936–957.
31. Hay C. (2002), Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
32. Inglehart R. (1988), ‘The renaissance of political culture’, American Political Science Review 82(4): 1203–1230.
33. Jackson P.T. (2006), ‘A statistician strikes out: in defense of genuine methodological diversity’, in S.F. Schram and B. Caterino (eds), Making Political Science Matter, New York: New York University Press, 86–97.
34. Jenkins K. (2006), ‘Postmodernism, the end of history and Frank Ankersmit’, in A.L. Macfie (ed.), The Philosophy of History, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 138–154.
35. Jordan G. (1990), ‘Policy community realism versus “new” institutionalist ambiguity’, Political Studies XXXVIII(3): 470–484.
36. Keating M. (2001), Plurinational Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. King G., Keohane R.O., Verba S. (1994), Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Kratochwil F. (2008), ‘Constructivism: what it is (not) and how it matters’, in D. della Porta and M. Keating (eds), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 80–98.
39. Kymlicka W. (1995), Multicultural Citizenship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Lane J.-E., Ersson S. (2005), Culture and Politics. A Comparative Approach, 2nd edn. Aldershot: Gower.
41. Lewis O., Steinmo S (2008), ‘Taking evolution seriously’, mimeo, Florence: European University Institute.
42. Lichbach M.I. (1997), ‘social theory and comparative politics’, in M.I. Lichbach and A.S. Zuckerman (eds), Comparative Politics. Rationality, Structure, and Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239–276.
43. Lustick I.S. (1996), ‘History, historiography and political science: multiple historical records and the problem of selection bias’, American Political Science Review 90(3): 605–618.
44. Mahoney J., Rueschemeyer D. (eds) (2003), ‘Comparative historical analysis: achievements and agendas’, in Comparative Historical Research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–40.
45. March J.G., Olsen J.P. (1984), ‘The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life’, American Political Science Review 78: 734–748.
46. March J., Olsen J. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions, New York: Free Press.
47. Marsh D., Stoker G. (eds) (1995), Theory and Methods in Political Science, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
48. North D.C. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Paasi A. (2002), ‘Place and region: regional worlds and words’, Progress in Human Geography 26(6): 802–811.
50. Pierre J., Peters B.G. (2000), Governance, Politics and the State, London: Palgrave.
51. Pierson P. (2004), Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
52. Pizzorno A. (2008), ‘Rationality and recognition’, in D. della Porta and M. Keating (eds), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Portes A. (2001), ‘social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology 24: 1–24.
54. Przeworski A., Teune H. (1970), The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry, New York: Wiley-Interscience.
55. Putnam R. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. Ross M.H. (1997), ‘Culture and identity in comparative political analysis’, in M.I. Lichback and A.S. Zuckerman (eds), Comparative Politics. Rationality, Culture, and Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Steinmo S., Thelen K., Longstreth F. (eds) (1992), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Van Langenhoven L. (2007), Innovating the Social Sciences. Towards more Useable Knowledge for Society, Vienna: Passagen Verlag.