Challenges, advantages, and disadvantages of instructional technology in the community college classroom

Community College Journal of Research and Practice

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 473-484

  Al Bataineh, Adel ^a   Brooks, Leanne ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011457114     PISSN: 10668926     EISSN: 15210413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713838180     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Becker, H. J., Ravitz, J. L., & Wong, Y. T. (1999). Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers and software. Teaching, learning, and computing, 1998: National survey. Report 3. University of California at Irvine: CRITO. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service N. ED437927)
2. Cerf, V. (1999, April). The internet is for everyone. Speech presented at the meeting of the Internet Society on Computers, Freedom, and Privacy. [On-line]. Available: http://www.isoc.org/isoc/media/speeches/foreveryone.shtml
3. Decatur School District 61. (1998). Technology plan update for Decatur School District 61. (Available from Decatur Public Schools, 101 W. Cerro Gordo, Decatur, IL 62523).
4. International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). National educational technology standards for students: Connecting curriculum and technology. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
5. Johnson, D., & Bartleson, E. (2001, October). Assessing technology skills for educational leaders. Learning & Leading with Technology, 29, 42-45.
6. Johnson, J. M. (2001a) Evaluating technology resources. Learning & Leading with Technology, 29, 58-61.
7. Johnson, J. M. (2001b). Software reviews save time selecting software. Learning and Leading with Technology 27(6) 1-12. [On-line]. Available: http://206.58.233.20/L&L/archive/vol27/no6/software/reviews.html
8. McNabb, M. (2001, October). In search of appropriate usage guidelines. Learning & Leading with Technology, 29, 50-53.
9. Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (1998). Curriculum foundations, principles, and issues (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
10. Robyler, M. D. (1989). The impact of microcomputer-based instruction on teaching and learning. A review of recent research. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED346082)
11. Robyler, M. D., Castine, W. H. & King, F. J. (1988). Assessing the impact of computer-based instruction: A review of recent research. Computers in the Schools, 5, 117-149.
12. Robyler, M. D. & Edwards, J. (2000). Integrating educational technology into teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Shields, M. K. & Behrman, R. E. (2000). Children and computer technology: Analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children, Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 1-27. [On-line]. Available: http://www.futureofchildren.org/information2826/information_show.htm?doc_id=69789
14. Valdez, G., McNabb, M., Foertsch, M., Anderson, M., Hawkes, M., & Raack, L. (1999). Computer-based technology and learning: Evolving uses and expectations. Oakbrook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
15. Zakon, R. H. (2003) Hobbes’ internet timeline. [Online]. Available: http://www.zakon.org/robert/internet/timeline.
16. Zenger, W. F., & Zenger, S. K., (1999, April). Schools and curricula for the 21st century: Predictions, visions, and anticipations. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 83(606), 49-60.