State support for interinstitutional transfer and articulation: The impact of databases and information systems

Community College Journal of Research and Practice

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 313-332

  Welsh, John F ^a   Kjorlien, Chad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011441762     PISSN: 10668926     EISSN: 15210413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106689201750122415     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adelman, S., Ewell, P. T., & Grable, J. (1989). LONESTAR: Texas’ voluntary tracking and developmental education evaluation system. In T. H. Bers (Ed.), New directions for community colleges: Using student tracking systems effectively (No. 66, pp. 71-82). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Ahumada, M. M. (1993). Inter-institutional transfer and articulation: The role of data bases and information systems. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 17, 141-152.
3. Berman, P., Curry, J., Nelson, B., & Weiler, D. (1990). Enhancing transfer effectiveness: A model for the 1990s. Washington, DC: American Association of Community and Junior Colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 324 050)
4. Bers, T. H. (1989). Tracking systems and student flow. In T. H. Bers (Ed.), New directions for community colleges: Using student tracking systems effectively (No. 66, pp. 3-7). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Bers, T. H. (1992). The costs and benefits of student tracking systems. Community, Technical, and Junior College Journal, 6(4), 21-23.
6. Bers, T. H., & Rubin, A. M. (1989). Tracking students in community colleges: The unreported challenges. In T. H. Bers (Ed.), New directions for community colleges: Using student tracking systems effectively (No. 66, pp. 55-66). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Campbell, D. F. (1990). Survey of state directors on student transfer reporting and analysis. Washington, DC: National Council of State Directors of Community-Junior Colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 330 394)
8. Clagett, C. G., & Huntington, R. (1991). Assessing the transfer function: Data exchanges and transfer rates. Community College Review, 19(4), 21-26.
9. Cohen, A. M., & Brawer, F. B. (1987). The collegiate function of community colleges. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Cohen, A. M., & Brawer, F. B. (1989). The American community college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Cohen, A. M., Brawer, F. B., & Bensimon, E. (1985). Transfer students in American community colleges. Los Angeles: ERIC Clearinghouse for Junior Colleges.
12. Ewell, P. T. (1995). Working over time: The evolution of longitudinal student tracking data bases. In P. T. Ewell (Ed.), New directions for institutional research: Student tracking: New techniques, new demands (No. 87, pp. 7-19). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Ewell, P. T., & Jones, D. (1987). Principles of longitudinal enrollment analysis: Conducting retention and student flow studies. In J. A. Muffo & G. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), A primer on institutional research. Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research.
14. Ewell, P. T., & Jones, D. (1991). Assessing and reporting student progress: A response to the new accountability. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
15. Holton, J. (1991). Assessing the transfer function: Tracking down transfer students. Frederick, MD: Frederick Community College. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 348 091)
16. Kintzer, F. C. (Ed.). (1982). New directions for community colleges: Improving articulation and transfer relationships (No. 39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Kintzer, F. C. (1989). Articulation and transfer: A review of current literature on statewide and interinstitutional models and trends. Trenton: New Jersey State Department of Higher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 311 946)
18. Knoell, D. M, & Medsker L. L. (1965). From junior to senior college: A national study of the transfer student. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
19. Lenth, C., & Russell, A. B. (1991). Statewide student data systems and capabilities to report postsecondary graduation rates. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
20. Newman, F. (1987). Choosing quality: Reducing conflict between the state and university. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
21. Palmer, J. (1989). Trends and issues: Student tracking systems at community colleges. In T. Bers (Ed.), New directions for community colleges: Using student tracking systems effectively (No. 66, pp. 95-103). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Palmer, J. (1992). Student tracking systems: Concepts and issues. Community, Technical, and Junior College Journal, 62(4), 14-19.
23. Rodriguez, E. (1994). State-level educational reform: Collaborative roles for higher education. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
24. Russell, A. B. (1999). The status of statewide student transition data systems: A survey of SHEEO agencies. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
25. Russell, A. B., & Chisholm, M. (1995). Tracking in multi-institutional contexts. In P. T. Ewell, (Ed.), New directions for institutional research: Student tracking: New techniques, new demands (No. 87, pp. 43-54). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Student Right to Know and Campus Security Act of 1990, 20U.S.C. Sec. 1092 etseq. (1990).
27. Walleri, R. D. (1990). Tracking and follow-up for community college students: Institutional and statewide initiatives. Community/Junior College Quarterly of Research and Practice, 14(1), 21-36.
28. Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education. (1985). Improving the articulation-transfer process between two- and four-year institutions. Boulder, CO: Author.