In referees we trust?

Physics Today

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 44-49

  Baldwin, Melinda ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011357026     PISSN: 00319228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/PT.3.3463     Document Type: Short Survey

References (11)

1. H. Zuckerman, R. Merton, Minerva 9, 66 (1971). 10.1007/BF015531880026-4695
2. A. Fyfe, J. McDougall-Waters, N. Moxham, Notes Rec.: R. Soc. J. Hist. Sci. 69, 227 (2015). 10.1098/rsnr.2015.00360035-9149
3. A. Csiszar, Nature 532, 306 (2016). 10.1038/532306a0028-0836
4. M. Baldwin, in The Age of Scientific Naturalism: Tyndall and His Contemporaries, B. Lightman, M. Reidy, eds., Pickering and Chatto (2014), p. 171.
5. I. Clarke, Isis 106, 70 (2015). 10.1086/6810370021-1753
6. R. Lalli, Notes Rec.: R. Soc. J. Hist. Sci. 70, 151 (2016). 10.1098/rsnr.2015.00220035-9149
7. R. Kohler, Partners in Science: Foundations and Natural Scientists, 1900-1945, U. Chicago Press (1991), p. 68.
8. I. H. Page, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 225, 1240 (1973). 10.1001/jama.1973.032203800520150098-7484
9. D. Kaiser, Nature 505, 153 (2014). 10.1038/505153a0028-0836
10. J. Conlan to H. G. Stever, 15 May 1975, in National Science Foundation Peer Review, Special Oversight Hearings, US House of Representatives, p. 21.
11. M. Eisen, quoted in H. Campbell, Wall Street Journal, 13 July 2014, http://www.wsj.com/articles/hank-campbell-the-corruption-of-peer-review-is-harming-scientific-credibility-1405290747.