The determinants of medical technology adoption in different decisional systems: A systematic literature review

Health Policy

Volumn 121, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 230-242

  Varabyova, Yauheniya ^a   Blankart, Carl Rudolf ^a,b   Greer, Ann Lennarson ^c   Schreyögg, Jonas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making systems; Determinants; Innovation; Medical technology; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; MASS COMMUNICATION; ORGANIZATION; STANDARDS;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 85011349840     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: 18726054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.01.005     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. [1] AHA, Adopting technological innovation in hospitals: who pays and who benefits?. 2006, American Hospital Association.
2. [2] Anderson, G.F., Steinberg, E.P., Role of the hospital in the acquisition of technology. Medical Innovation at the Crossroads 4 (1994), 61–70.
3. [3] Greer, A.L., Adoption of medical technology: the hospital's three decision systems. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1 (1985), 669–680.
4. [4] Meyer, A.D., Mingling decision making metaphors. Academy of Management Review 9 (1984), 6–17.
5. [5] Greer, A.L., From planning to the market: changes in hospital approaches to medical technology. 1996, Managing Technology in Healthcare: Springer, 127–153.
6. [6] Damanpour, F., Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal 34 (1991), 555–590.
7. [7] Tornatzky, L.G., Klein, K.J., Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 29 (1982), 28–45.
8. [8] Wolfe, R.A., Organizational innovation: review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies 31 (1994), 405–431.
9. [9] Coleman, J., Katz, E., Menzel, H., The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry 20 (1957), 253–270.
10. [10] Fleuren, M., Wiefferink, K., Paulussen, T., Determinants of innovation within health care organizations literature review and Delphi study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 16 (2004), 107–123.
11. [11] Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O., Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly 82 (2004), 581–629.
12. [12] Länsisalmi, H., Kivimäki, M., Aalto, P., Ruoranen, R., Innovation in healthcare: a systematic review of recent research. Nursing Science Quarterly 19 (2006), 66–72.
13. [13] Lu, L.Y., Lin, L.H., Wu, G.C., Applying options to evaluate service innovations in the automotive industry. International Journal of Technology Management 32 (2005), 339–349.
14. [14] Yarbrough, A.K., Smith, T.B., Technology acceptance among physicians a new take on TAM. Medical Care Research and Review 64 (2007), 650–672.
15. [15] Yusof, M.M., Stergioulas, L., Zugic, J., Health information systems adoption: findings from a systematic review. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 129 (2007), 262–266.
16. [16] Robert, G., Greenhalgh, T., MacFarlane, F., Peacock, R., Adopting and assimilating new non-pharmaceutical technologies into health care: a systematic review. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 15 (2010), 243–250.
17. [17] Robert, G., Greenhalgh, T., MacFarlane, F., Peacock, R., Organisational factors influencing technology adoption and assimilation in the NHS: A systematic literature review. Report for the National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation programme., 2009.
18. [18] Consoli, D., Mina, A., An evolutionary perspective on health innovation systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 19 (2009), 297–319.
19. [19] Rye, C.B., Kimberly, J.R., The adoption of innovations by provider organizations in health care. Medical Care Research and Review 64 (2007), 235–278.
20. [20] Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed., 2003, Free Press, New York, NY.
21. [21] Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 151 (2009), 264–269.
22. [22] Kimberly, J.R., Evanisko, M.J., Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal 24 (1981), 689–713.
23. [23] Meyer, A.D., Goes, J.B., Organizational assimilation of innovations: a multilevel contextual analysis. Academy of Management Journal 31 (1988), 897–923.
24. [24] Slavin, R.E., Best-evidence synthesis: an alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher 15 (1986), 5–11.
25. [25] Giacomini, M.K., Cook, D.J., Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 284 (2000), 357–362.
26. [26] Russell, C., Gregory, D., DiCenso, A., Guyatt, G., Qualitative research. DiCenso, A., Guyatt, G., Ciliska, D., (eds.) Evidence-based nursing: a guide to clinical practice, 2014, Elsevier Health Sciences, St. Louis, MO.
27. [27] Huckman, R.S., The utilization of competing technologies within the firm: evidence from cardiac procedures. Management Science 49 (2003), 599–617.
28. [28] Morse, E.V., Gordon, G., Moch, M., Hospital costs and quality of care: an organizational perspective. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly Health and Society 52 (1974), 315–346.
29. [29] Gold, H.T., Pitrelli, K., Hayes, M.K., Murphy, M.M., Decision to adopt medical technology case study of breast cancer radiotherapy techniques. Medical Decision Making 34 (2014), 1006–1015.
30. [30] Finocchiaro Castro, M., Guccio, C., Pignataro, G., Rizzo, I., The effects of reimbursement mechanisms on medical technology diffusion in the hospital sector in the Italian NHS. Health Policy 115 (2014), 215–229.
31. [31] Barbash, G.I., Friedman, B., Glied, S.A., Steiner, C.A., Factors associated with adoption of robotic surgical technology in US hospitals and relationship to radical prostatectomy procedure volume. Annals of Surgery 259 (2014), 1–6.
32. [32] Greenberg, D., Peterburg, Y., Vekstein, D., Pliskin, J.S., Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 21 (2005), 219–227.
33. [33] Fendrick, A.M., Escarce, J.J., McLane, C., Shea, J.A., Schwartz, J.S., Hospital adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Medical Care 32 (1994), 1058–1063.
34. [34] Teplensky, J.D., Pauly, M.V., Kimberly, J.R., Hillman, A.L., Schwartz, J.S., Hospital adoption of medical technology: an empirical test of alternative models. Health Services Research 30 (1995), 437–465.
35. [35] Moch, M.K., Morse, E.V., Size, centralization and organizational adoption of innovations. American Sociological Review 42 (1977), 716–725.
36. [36] Baker, L.C., Managed care and technology adoption in health care: evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Health Economics 20 (2001), 395–421.
37. [37] Robertson, T.S., Wind, Y., Organizational psychographics and innovativeness. Journal of Consumer Research 7 (1980), 24–31.
38. [38] Nystrom, P.C., Ramamurthy, K., Wilson, A.L., Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: adoption of imaging technology. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 19 (2002), 221–247.
39. [39] Goes, J.B., Park, S.H., Interorganizational links and innovation: the case of hospital services. Academy of Management Journal 40 (1997), 673–696.
40. [40] Tabak, F., Barr, S.H., Propensity to adopt technological innovations: the impact of personal characteristics and organizational context. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 16 (1999), 247–270.
41. [41] Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D.R., Miller, T., Sutton, A.J., et al. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research: a critical perspective. Qualitative research 6 (2006), 27–44.
42. [42] Bech, M., Christiansen, T., Dunham, K., Lauridsen, J., Lyttkens, C.H., McDonald, K., et al. The influence of economic incentives and regulatory factors on the adoption of treatment technologies: a case study of technologies used to treat heart attacks. Health Economics 18 (2009), 1114–1132.
43. [43] Costa-Font, J., McGuire, A., Serra-Sastre, V., The “Weisbrod Quadrilemma” revisited: insurance incentives on new health technologies. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice 37 (2012), 678–695.
44. [44] Lambooij, M.S., Engelfriet, P., Westert, G.P., Diffusion of innovations in health care: does the structural context determine its direction. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 26 (2010), 415–420.
45. [45] Mahal, A., Varshney, A., Taman, S., Diffusion of diagnostic medical devices and policy implications for India. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 22 (2006), 184–190.
46. [46] Oh, E.H., Imanaka, Y., Evans, E., Determinants of the diffusion of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 21 (2005), 73–80.
47. [47] Slade, E.P., Anderson, G.F., The relationship between per capita income and diffusion of medical technologies. Health Policy 58 (2001), 1–14.
48. [48] Baker, S.R., The diffusion of high technology medical innovation: the computed tomography scanner example. Social Science & Medicine Part D: Medical Geography 13 (1979), 155–162.
49. [49] Friedman, L.H., Goes, J.B., The timing of medical technology acquisition: strategic decision making in turbulent environments. Journal of Healthcare Management/American College of Healthcare Executives 45 (2000), 317–330.