The role of research problems in the process of research"

Social Epistemology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 59-83

  Allwood, Carl Martin ^a   Rmark, Jan Ba ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011248854     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: 14645297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/026917299298790     Document Type: Note

References (52)

1. Allwood, C. M. 1987, ‘Anthropology of knowledge and cognitive psychology’, Communication and Cognition, 20, 295-310.
2. Allwood, C. M. and BArmark, J. 1994, ‘Forskares problemgenerering’ [Researchers’ problem development], Vest Tidskrift for Vetemkapsstudier, 7, 7-16.
3. Allwood, C. M. and BArmark, J. 1996, ‘ Forskningsproblem och kunskapsutveckling’ [Research problems and development of knowledge], in Proceedings till Konferens for kunskapsbildnirg [Proceedings from conference for knowledge formation]. Tanum Strand, June.
4. Allwood, C. M. and BArmark, J. 1977,‘ Forskningsproblem och kunskapsutveckling’ [Research problems and development of knowledge], in Kunskapsbildnirg; genom forskning och undervismng Goteborgs universitets konferens i Tanum Strand 6-9 juni 1996 [Knowledge development through research and teaching] (pp. 41-55). Skriftserie Nr. 17, Delegationen for kvalitetsutveckling, Goteborg University, Sweden.
5. Arhem, K. (ed.) 194, Den antropologiska erfarenheten [The anthropological experience] (Stockholm: Carlssons).
6. Barley, N. 1987, A Plague of Caterpillars (London: Penguin Books).
7. BArmark, J. 1985, Sjalvforverkligandets psykologi. Ett central tema hos Abraham Maslow [The psychology of selfactualization. A central theme of Abraham Maslow] (Stockholm: Naturoch Kultur).
8. BArmark, J. 1987, Forskare och praktiker—n^igra vetenskapsteoretiska reflektioner’ [Scientists and practicians—some metascientific reflections], in R. St^al and L. Svedberg (eds), Det ovissa motet—om falt och forskning i socialt arbete [The uncertain encounter'—onfield and research in social work] (Stockholm: Raben & Sjogren).
9. BArmark, J. and WallEn, G. 1979, The interaction of cognitive and social factors in steering a large scale interdisciplinary project. Report no. 41, Series no. 2, Department for the Theory of Science, Goteborg University.
10. BArmark, J. and WallEn, G. 1980, ‘ The development of an interdisciplinary project’, in K. D. Knorr, R. Krohn and R. Whitley (eds), The Social Process of Scientific Investigation Vol. IV, Sociology of the Sciences (Dordrecht: D. Reidel), pp. 221-35.
11. BARTH, F. 1987, Cosmologies in the Making (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
12. Bateson, G. 1988, Ande ochnatur [Mind and nature] (Lund: Symposion).
13. BOhme, G., Vanden Daele, W. and Krohn, W. 1973, ‘ Die finalisierung der wissenschaft’, Zdtschrifl fur Sociologie, 2, 128-144.
14. Bunge M. 1967, Scientific Research, I. The Search for System (Berlin: Springer Verlag).
15. Colvin, P. 1977, ‘Ontological and epistemological commitments and social relations in science’, in E. Mendelsohn, P. Weingart and R. Whitley (eds), The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge (Dordrecht: D. Reidel).
16. Feyerabend, P. 1970, ‘ Consolationsforthe specialist’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
17. Fowler, D. D. and Hardesty, D. (eds) 1994, Others Knowing Others. Perspective on Ethnographic Careers (Washington: Smithsonian InstitutionPress).
18. Freud, S. 1971, ‘Theunconscious’, in M. M. R. Khan (ed.), Collected Papers. Vol. 4 (London: TheHogarth Press).
19. Fuller, S. 1992, Epistemology radically naturalized: recovering the normative, the experimental and the social, in R. N. Giere (ed.), Cognitive models of science. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of science (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 427-459.
20. Gardner, H. 1993, Creating Minds (New York: Basic Books).
21. Geertz, C. 1995, After the Fact (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
22. Gerholm, L. (ed.) 1993, Etnologiskavisioner [Ethnological visions] (Stockholm: Carlssons).
23. Gilligan, C. and Attanucci, J. 1988, ‘Two moral orientations: gender differences and similarities’, Merrill- Palmer Quarterly, 34, 223-37.
24. Gohlson, B. and Barker, P. 1985, ‘ Kuhn, Lakatos, and Laudan’, American Psychologist, 40, 755-69.
25. Gruber, H. E. 1980, ‘Cognitive psychology, scientific creativity and the case study method’, in M. D. Grmek, R. S. Cohen and G. Cimino (eds), On Scientific Discovery (Dordrecht: D. Reidel), pp. 295-322.
26. Gruber, H. E. 1989, ‘Networks of enterprise in creative scientific work’, in B. Gholson, W. R. Shadish, R. A. Neimeyer and A. C. Houts (eds), Psychology of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
27. Israel, J. 1956, ‘The authoritarian ideology of upbringing. Ph.D. thesis (Stockholm: Alunquist Och Wicksell).
28. Israel, J. 1994, ‘Forskning och liv—En enhet?’ [Research and life—a unit?], Vest Tidskrift for Vetenskapsstudier, 7, 51-54.
29. Johansson G. 1950, Configurations in Event Perception. An Experimental Study (Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells).
30. Johansson G. and BOrjesson, E. 1989, ‘Toward a new theory of vision. Studies in wide-angle space perception’, Ecological Psychology, 1, 301-31.
31. Klages, H. 1967, Rationalitat und Spontanietat [Rationality/and spontaneity] (Gutersloh: C. Bertelsmann Verlag).
32. Koestler, A. 1964, The Act of Creation (London: Hutchinson).
33. Kragh, U. 1955, The Actual Genetic Model of Perception-Personality (Lund: Gleerups).
34. Kragh, U. and Smith, G. (eds) 1970, Percept-Genetic Analysis (Lund: Gleerups).
35. Kuhn, T. 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).
36. Kuhn, T. 1970, ‘Logic of discovery or psychology of research’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
37. Kuhn, T. 1977, ‘ Second thoughts on paradigms’, in T. Kuhn (ed.), The EsseMial Tensions (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).
38. Lakatos, I. 1970, ‘ Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
39. LowRy, R.J. 1973, A. H. Maslow: AnIntellectualPortrait (Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing).
40. Maslow, A. 1954, Motivation and Personality (New York: Harper & Row).
41. Miller, A. 1986, Imagery in Scientific Thought (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
42. Mitroff, I. I. 1974, The Subjective Side of Science (Amsterdam: Elsevier).
43. Monk, R. 1990, Ludwig Wittgenstein The Duy of Genius (London: Jonathan Cape).
44. Nagel, E. 1961, The Structure of Science (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
45. Popper, K. R. 1972, Objective Knowledge (London: Oxford University Press).
46. Popper, K. R. 1988, Enintellektuellsjalvbiografi [Unended quest] (Lund: Doxa).
47. Russell, B. 1963, ‘My mental development’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell (New York: Harper Torchbooks).
48. SAllstro m, P. 1994, ‘ Franpartikelfysiktillfargla ra’ [From particle physics to theory of colour], Vest Tidskrift for Vetenskapsstudier, 7, 55-57.
49. Smith, G. 1986, Upplevande ochverklighet [Experience and reality] (Lund: Studentlitteratur).
50. Wallen, G. 1984, ‘Om fallstudiemetodik i forskning om forskning’ [On case study method in science of science], in J. Ba rmark (ed.), Forskning om forskning [Science of science] (Stockholm: Natur och Kultur).
51. Wallén, G. 1996, Vetenskapsteori och forskningsmetodik [Theory of science and research method] (Lund: Studentlitteratur).
52. Westrum, R. 1994, ‘Thinking by groups, organisations, and networks: a sociologist’s view of the social psychology of science and technology’, in W. Shadish and S. Fuller (eds), The Social Psychology of Science (New York: The Guilford Press)