Proficient reader subtypes: Implications for literacy theory, assessment, and practice

Reading Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 217-232

  Manzo, Anthony V ^a   Manzo, Ula ^b   Barnhill, Amy ^a   Thomas, Matthew ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^b LiteracyLeadersCom LLC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011222779     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: 15210685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02702710050144359     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Chase, F. (1961). Demand on the reader in the next decade. Controversial issues in reading and promising solutions. Supplementary Educational Monographs, 91, 7–18. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Gardner (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.
3. Gurian, M. (1997). The Wonder of Boys, New York: Penguin Putnam.
4. Hartman, D. (1995). Eight readers reading: The intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 520–561.
5. Huttenlocker, R. R., & Huttenlocker, J. (1973). A study of children with hyperlexia. Neurology, 23, 1107–1116.
6. Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1986). Reading disability research: An interactionist perspective. Review of Educational Research, 56, 111–136.
7. Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Manzo, A. V., Barnhill, A., Lang, A., Manzo, U. C., & Thomas, M. (1997). Discovery of Proficient Reader Subtypes: Implications for Literacy Theory and Practices. Paper presented at the College Reading Association Conference, Boston, MA.
9. Manzo, A. V., Manzo, U. C., & Estes, T. (in press). Content Area Literacy: Interactive teaching for active learning (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Perfetti, C. A. (1993). Why inferences might be restricted. Discourse Process, 16, 181–192.
11. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness. New York: Scribners.
12. Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive compensatory model of individual differences on the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32–71.