The development of children’s strategic processing in reading recovery

Reading Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 129-151

  Schmitt, Maribeth Cassidy ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011215882     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: 15210685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02702710120766     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Allington, R. L., & Walmsley, S. A. (1995). Redefining and reforming instructional support programs for at-risk students. In R. L. Allington & S. A. Walmsley (Eds.), No quick fix: Rethinking literacy programs in America’s elementary schools (pp. 19–44). New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Askew, B. J., Fountas, I., Lyons, C. A., Pinnell, G. S., & Schmidt, M. C. (1998). Reading Recovery review: Understandings, outcomes, and implications. Columbus, OH: Reading Recovery Council of North America.
3. Clay, M. M. (1979). The early detection of reading difficulties. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4. Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
5. Clay, M. M. (1993a). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6. Clay, M. M. (1993b). Reading Recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. Clay, M. M., & Cazden, C. B. (1990). A Vygotskian interpretation of Reading Recovery. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 206–222). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cox, B. E. (1994). Young children’s regulatory talk: Evidence of emerging metacognitive control over literary products and processes. In R. Ruddell & M. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
9. Cox, B. E., Fang, Z., & Carpenter, S. (1995, December). Examining changes in structural patterns used by children during Reading Recovery. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, New Orleans, LA.
10. Cox, B E., Fang, Z., & Schmitt, M. C. (1995, December). At-risk children’s metacognitive growth during Reading Recovery experience: A Vygotskian interpretation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, New Orleans, LA.
11. Paris S. G., Wasik B., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Volume II (pp. 609–640). New York: Longman.
12. Rowe, D. R. (1989). Preschoolers’ use of metacognitive knowledge and strategies in self-selected literacy events. In S. McCormack & J. Zutell (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy learning; and instruction (pp. 65–76). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
13. Schmitt, M. C. (1988). The effects of an elaborated directed reading activity on the metacomprehension skills of third graders. In J. E. Readence & R. S. Baldwin (Eds.), Dialogues in literacy research. Chicago: National Reading Conference.
14. Schmitt, M. C. (1998, December). Development of metacognitive knowledge regarding self, task, and strategy variables during Reading Recovery program instruction. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
15. Schmitt, M. C., Younts, T., & Hopkins, C. J. (1994, December). From “at-risk” to strategic, self-regulated learners: Reading Recovery from Vygotskian and metacognitive perspectives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, CA.
16. Spiegel, D. L. (1995). A comparison of traditional remedial programs and Reading Recovery: Guidelines for success for all programs. The Reading Teacher, 49, 86–96.
17. Sulzby, E. (1985). Children’s emergent reading of favorite storybooks: A developmental study. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 458–481.