Comment

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 91, Issue 434, 1996, Pages 462-465

  Moffitt, Robert A ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011187134     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: 1537274X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476905     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Amemiya, T. (1984), –Nonlinear Regression models,— in Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 1, eds. Z. Griliches and M. Intriligator, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 333-389.
2. Bjorklund, A., and Moffitt, R. (1987), –Estimation of Wage Gains and Welfare Gains in Self-Selection Models,— Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 42-49.
3. Bound, J., Jaeger, D., and Baker, R. (1995), –Problems with Instrumental Variables When the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Explanatory Variable is Weak,— Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 443-450.
4. Goldberger, A. (1972), –Selection Bias in Evaluating Treatment Effects: Some Formal Illustrations,— Discussion Paper 123-72, University of Wisconsin, Institute for Research on Poverty.
5. Hausman, J. (1984), –Specification and Estimation of Simultaneous Equations Models,— in Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 1., eds. Z. Griliches and M. Intriligator, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 392-448.
6. Heckman, J. (1978), –Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System,— Econometrica, 46, 931-960.
7. Heckman, J. (in press), –Randomization as an Instrumental Variable,— Review of Economics and Statistics.
8. Heckman, J., and Hotz, V. J. (1989), –Choosing Among Alternative Nonexperimental Methods for Estimating the Impact of Social Programs: The Case of Manpower Training,— Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 862-874.
9. Heckman, J., and Robb, R. (1985), –Alternative Models for Evaluating the Impact of Interventions,— in Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data, eds. J. Heckman and B. Singer, Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press, pp. 156-245.
10. Heckman, J., and Robb, R. (1986), –Alternative Methods for Solving the Problem of Selection Bias in Evaluating the Impact of Treatments on Outcomes,— in Drawing lnferencesfrom Self-Selected Samples, ed. H. Wainer. New York: SpringVerlag, pp. 63-107.
11. Hsiao, C. (1984), –Identification,— in Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. I., eds. Z. Griliches and M. Intriligator, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 224-283.
12. Lam, D., and Miron, J. (1991), –Seasonality of Births in Human Populations,— Social Biology, 38, 51-78.
13. Lee, L. F. (1979), –Identification and Estimation in Binary Choice Models With Limited (Censored) Dependent Variables,— Econometrica, 47, 977-996.
14. Manski, C. (1990), –Nonparametric Bounds for Treatment Effects,— American Economic Review, 80, 319-323.
15. Manski, C. (1994), –The Selection Problem,— in Advances in Econometrics, Sixth World Congress, ed, C. Sims. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press, pp. 143-170.
16. McFadden, D. (1974), –Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior,— in Frontiers in Econometrics, ed, P. Zarembka. New York: Academic Press, pp. 105-142.
17. Manski, C. (1984), –Econometric Analysis of Qualitative Response Models. — in Handbook ofEconometrics, eds. Z. Griliches and M. Intriligator, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 1396-1457.
18. Moffitt, R. (1989), Comment on –Choosing Among Alternative Nonexperimental Methods for Estimating the Impact of Social Programs: TheCase of Manpower Training,— by J. Heckman and V. J. Hotz, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 877-878.
19. Moffitt, R. (1996), –Selection Bias Adjustment in Treatment-Effect Models as a Method of Aggregation,— in 1995 Proceedings of the American Statistical Association.
20. Rosenbaum, P., and Rubin, D. (1983), –The Central Role of the PropensityScore in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,— Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
21. Roy, A. D. (1951), –Some Thoughts on the Distribution of Earnings,— Oxford Economic Papers, 3, 135-146.
22. Staiger, D., and Stock, J. (1993), –Instrumental Variable Regression With Weak Instruments,— mimeo, Harvard University.