A generalizability study of the effects of training on teachers’ abilities to rate children’s writing using a rubric

Reading Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 107-127

  Stuhlmann, Janice ^a   Daniel, Cathy ^a   Dellinger, Amy ^a   Kenton Denny, R ^a   Powers, Taylor ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011187077     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: 15210685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/027027199278439     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Au, K. H., Scheu, J. A., Kawakami, A. J., & Herman, P. A. (1990). Assessment and accountability in a whole literacy curriculum. The Reading Teacher, 43, 574–578.
2. Brennan, R. L. (1996). The conventional wisdom about group mean scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32(4), 385–396.
3. Eason, S. (1991). Why generalizability theory yields better results than classical test theory: A primer with concrete examples. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in educational research: Substantive findings, methodological developments (pp. 83–99). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
4. Farr, R. (1992). Putting it all together: Solving the reading assessment puzzle. The Reading Teacher, 46, 26–37.
5. Farr, R. & Tone, B. (1998). Portfolio and performance assessment: Helping students evaluate their progress as readers and writers (2nd ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace
6. Gillespie, C. S., Ford, K. L., Gillespie, R. D., & Leavell, A. G. (1996). Portfolio assessment: Some questions, some answers, some recommendations. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39, 480–491.
7. Glazer, S. M., & Brown, C. S. (1993). Portfolios and be yond: Collaborative assessment in reading and writing. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon
8. Grady, E. (1992). The portfolio approach to assessment. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation
9. Herman, J. L., & Winters, L. (1994). Portfolio research: A slim collection. Educational Leadership, 52(2), 48–55.
10. IRA/NCTE Joint Task Force on Assessment. (1994). Standards for the assessment of reading and writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, and Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
11. Khattri, N., Reeve, A., & Kane, M. (1998). Principles and Practices of Performance Assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
12. Koretz, D., McCaffrey, D., Klein, S., Bell R., & Stecher, B. (1994). The reliability of Vermont portfolio scores in the 1992–93 school year. (Report No. TM021562). Los Angeles, CA: The Rand Corporation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 370 983)
13. Moening, A. A., & Bhavnagri, N. P. (1994). Showcase writing portfolios: An instructional strategy for first graders. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 376 476)
14. Routman, R. (1991). Invitations: Changing as teachers and learners K-12. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
15. Routman, R. (1996). Literacy at the crossroads: Crucial talk about reading, writing, and other teaching dilemmas. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
16. Shaklee, B., Barbour, N., Ambrose, R. & Hansford, S. (1997). Designing and using portfolios. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
17. Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
18. Stecher, B. M., & Hamilton, E.G. (1994). Portfolio assessment in Vermont, 1992–93: The teachers’ perspective on implementation and impact. Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement Education, New Orleans, LA: (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 372 112)
19. Valencia, S. (1990). A portfolio approach to classroom reading assessment: The whys, whats, and hows. The Reading Teacher, 43, 338–340.
20. Valencia, S.W., & Place, N. (1994). Portfolios: A process for enhancing teaching and learning. The Reading Teacher, 47, 666–669.
21. Wiener, R. & Cohen, J. (1997). Literacy Portfolios: Using assessment to guide instruction. Columbus, OH: Merrill
22. Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessment: Authenticity, context, and validity. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 200–214.
23. Winograd, P. (1994). Developing alternative assessments: Six problems worth solving. The Reading Teacher, 47, 420–423.