Analyzing language sequence in the sequence of language acquisition: Some comments on major and loup

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 361-368

  Ellis, Nick C ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011184835     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100015084     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bates, E. (1984). Bioprograms and the innateness hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 188–190.
2. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1981). Second language acquisition from a functionalist perspective. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 190–214.
3. Cairns, P., Shillcock, R., Chater, N., & Levy, J. P. (1995). Bottom-up connectionist modeling of speech. In J. P. Levy, D. Bairaktaris, J. A. Bullinaria, & P. Cairns (Eds.), Connectionist models of memory and language (pp. 289–310). London: UCL Press.
4. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
5. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
6. Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvian Bromberger (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Cook, V. J., & Newson, M. (1996). Chomsky ‘s Universal Grammar: An introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Ellis, N. C. (Ed.). (1994). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press.
9. Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91–126.
10. Ellis, N. C., & Laporte, N. (in press). Contexts of acquisition: Effects of formal instruction and naturalistic exposure on SLA. In A. de Groot & J. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Rules or associations in the acquisition of second language morphology? Human learning of regular and irregular morphosyntax and connectionist simulations of the frequency by regularity interaction. Manuscript in preparation.
12. Finch, S., & Chater, N. (1994). Learning syntactic categories: A statistical approach. In M. Oaksford & G. D. A. Brown (Eds.), Neurodynamics and psychology (pp. 295–321). London: Academic Press.
13. Kelly, L. G. (1969). Twenty-five centuries of language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
14. Lachter, J., & Bever, T. (1988). The relation between linguistic structure and associative theories of language learning: A constructive critique of some connectionist learning models. Cognition, 28, 195–247.
15. Levy, J. P., Bairaktaris, D., Bullinaria, J. A., & Cairns, P. (1995). Connectionist models of memory and language. London: UCL Press.
16. MacWhinney, B. (Ed.). (1987). Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. MacWhinney, B., & Leinbach, J. (1991). Implementations are not conceptualisations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition, 40, 121–157.
18. Marchman, V. A., & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 21, 339–366.
19. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). Interactive processes in speech perception: The TRACE Model. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models (pp. 58121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 27, 338–352.
21. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.
22. Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 29, 195–247.
23. Plunkett, K., & Marchmann, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48, 73–193.
24. Rumeihart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tense of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumeihart, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models (pp. 216–271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Rumeihart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Learning the past tense of English verbs: Implicit rules or parallel distributed processes? In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 195–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 175–208). New York: Holt Rinehart Winston.
28. Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1991). Language development from an evolutionary perspective. In N. A. Krasnegor, D. M. Rumbaugh, R. L. Schiefelbusch, & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds), Biological and behavioral determinants of language development (pp. 5–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Velleman, S. L. (1988). The role of linguistic perception in later phonological development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 221–236.
31. Vihman, M. M. (1996). Phonological development: The origins of language in the child. Oxford: Blackwell.