The economic consequences of bruno latour

Social Epistemology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 193-208

  McClellan, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011179125     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: 14645297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02691729608578814     Document Type: Note

References (43)

1. ANTONELLI, C. (ed.) (1995), The Economics of Information Networks, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
2. BARNES, B. (1980), 'On the causal explanation of scientific judgement', in Social Science Information, vol. 19, Sage, London and Beverly Hills, pp. 685-695.
3. BARNES, B. and MACKENZIE, D. (1979), 'On the role of interests in scientific change', in R. Wallis (ed.), On the Margins of Science: The Social Construction of Rejected Knowledge, Sociological Review Monograph 27, pp. 49-66.
4. BARTHES, R. (1988), 'Saussive, the sign, democracy' in The Semiotic Challenge, translated by R. Howard, Hill and Wang, New York, pp. 151-156.
5. BOURDIEU, P. (1975), 'The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason', in Social Science Information, vol. 14, Sage, London and Beverly Hills, pp. 19—47.
6. GALLON, M. (1980), 'Struggles and negotiations to define what is problematic and what is not', in K. D. Knorr, R. Krohn, and R. Whitley (eds), The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, vol. IV, Sociology of the Sciences, pp. 197-219.
7. CALLON, M. (1989), 'Introduction', in M. Callon (ed.), La Science et Ses Re'seaux, Editions la Decouverte/Conseil de l'Europe/UNESCO, Paris, pp. 7-33.
8. CALLON, M. and LAW, J. (1982), 'On interests and their transformation: enrolment and counter enrolment' in Social Studies of Science, vol. 12, Sage, London and Beverly Hills, pp. 615-625.
9. CALLON, M. and LAW, J. (1989), 'La Protohistoire d'un Laboratoire', in M. Callon (ed.), La Science et Ses Re'seaux, Editions de la Decouverte/Conseil de l'Europe/UNESCO, Paris, pp. 66-116.
10. CALLON, M., LAW, J. and RIP, A. (eds) (1986a), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, Macmillan Press, London.
11. CALLON, M., LAW, J. and RIP, A. (1986b), 'How to study the force of science', in M. Callon, J. Law and A. Rip (eds), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, Macmillan Press, London, pp. 3-18.
12. COLLINS, H. (1981), 'Stages in the empirical programme of relativism', in Social Studies ofScience, vol. 11, Sage, London and Beverly Hills, pp. 3-10.
13. COLLINS, J. and YEARLEY, S. (1992), 'Episterrological chicken', in A. Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, University of Chicago Press, ChicagD, pp. 301-326.
14. DILTHEY, W. (1989), Introduction to the Human Sciences. Volume I. Selected Works, edited by R. Makkreel and F. Rodi, translated by M. Neville, J. Barnouw, F. Schreiner and R. Makkreel, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
15. ELSTER, J. (1989), The Cement of Society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. FOUCAULT, M. (1980), 'Truth and power', in Power/Knowledge, Pan Theon Books, New York.
17. GALATIN, M. and LEITER, R. D. (1981), Economics of Information, Martin Nijhoff, Boston
18. GREIMAS, A. J. (1987), 'Actants, actors, and figures', in On Meaning translated by P. J. Perron and F. H. Collins, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 106-120.
19. HABERMAS, J. (1987a), 'Marx and the thesis o' internal colonization', in The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2, Life World and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, translated by T. McCarthy, Beacon Press, Boston, pp. 332-373.
20. HABERMAS, J. (1987b), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, translated by F. G. Lawrence, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
21. HOLLAND, P. W. and LEINHARDT, X. (eds) (1979), Perspectives on Social Network Research, Academic Press, New York.
22. KNORR-CETINA, K. D. (1982), 'Scientific communities or trans-epistemic arenas of Research? A critique of quasi-economic models of science', in Social Studies of Science, vol. 12, Sage, London and Beverly Hills, pp. 101-130.
23. LATOUR, B. (1981), 'Insiders & outsiders in tht sociology of science; or, how can we foster agnosticism?', in Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, vol. 3, pp. 199-216.
24. LATOUR, B. (1987), Science in Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
25. LATOUR, B. (1990), 'Postmodern? No, simply amodern! Steps toward an anthropology of science', in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 21, no. 1, Pergamon Press, London, pp. 145-171.
26. LATOUR, B. (1992), 'One more turn after the social turn…' in E. McMullin (ed.), The Social Dimension of Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, pp. 272-292.
27. LATOUR, B. (1993), We Have Never Been Mcdern, translated by K. Porter, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
28. LATOUR, B. and WOOLGAR, S. ([1979] 1986), Laboratory Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Originally published by Sage in 1979.
29. LAUDAN, L. (1977), Progress and Its Problems, University of California Press, Berkeley.
30. LAZEOA, E. (1990), 'Analyses de Reseaux et sociologie des organisations. Revue Franfaise de Sociologie, XXXV, pp. 293-320.
31. LEINHARDT, S. (ed.) (1977), Social Networks: A Developing Paradigm, Academic Press, New York.
32. LYOTARD, J. (1984), The Postmodern Condition- A Report on Knowledge, translated by G. Bennington and B. Massumi, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 4—5.
33. MANNHEIM, K. ([1927] 1971), 'Conservative nought', in K. H. Wolff (ed.), From Karl Mannheim, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 132-222.
34. MANNHEIM, K. ([1928] 1971), 'Competition.is cultural phenomenon', in K.H.Wolff (ed.), From Karl Mannheim, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 223-261.
35. MANNHEIM, K. (1936), Ideology and Utopia, translated by L. Wirth and E. Shils, Harcourt Brace Javanovich, New York.
36. MANNHEIM, K. (1982), 'The distinctive character of cultural-sociological knowledge', reprinted in D. Kettler, V. Meja and N. Stehr (eds), Structures of Thinking, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
37. MCCARTHY, T. (1990), 'The critique of impur.; reason', Political Theory, 18 (3), pp. 441-442.
38. MULKAY, M., GILBERT, G. N. and WOOLGAR, S. (1975), 'Problem areas and research networks in science', in Sociology, 9 (2), Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 187-203.
39. MULKAY, M., POTTER, J. and YEARLEY, S. (1983), 'Why an analysis of scientific discourse is needed', in K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (eds), Science O bserued: Perspectives on The Social Study of Science, Sage, London, pp. 171-203.
40. PLOTNITSKY, A. (1993), Reconfigurations: Criticcl Theory and General Economy, University of Florida Press, Gainesville.
41. SHAPIN, S. (1988), 'Following scientist around', in Social Studies of Science, vol. 18, Sage, London and Beverly Hills, pp. 533-550.
42. SIMMEL, G. (1950), The Sociology of George Simmel, translated and edited by K. H. Wolff, The Free Press, New York.
43. WOOLGAR, S. (1981), 'Interests and explanation in the social study of science', in Social Studies of Science, vol. 11, Sage, London and Beverly Hills, pp. 365-394.