PP-Attachment Disambiguation for Swedish: Combining Unsupervised and Supervised Training Data

Nordic Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 191-213

  Kokkinakis, Dimitrios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011176709     PISSN: 03325865     EISSN: 15024717     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/033258600750061518     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abney, S. 1990. Rapid Incremental Parsing with Repair. In Proceedings of the 6th New OEDC, Waterloo, ON, 1–9.
2. Basili, R., Candito, M. H., Pazienza, M. T., & Velardi, P. 1997. Evaluating the Information Gain of Probability-Based PP-Disambiguation Methods. In Jones D. & Somers H. (eds.), New Methods in Language Processing, London: UCL Press, 241–255.
3. Brill, E., & Resnik, P., 1994. A Rule-Based Approach to Prepositional Phrase Attachment Disambiguation. In Proceedings of the Computational Linguistics, COLING ’94, Paper available from: http://www.cs.jbu.edu/-brill/acadpubs.html
4. Brill, E. 1994. Some Advances in Rule-Based Part of Speech Tagging, In Proceedings of the 12th AAAI ’94, Seattle, WA.
5. Cardie, C., & Mooney, R. J. 1999. Guest Editors’ Introduction: Machine Learning and Natural Language, Journal of Machine Learning, Special Issue on Natural Language Learning 34, 1–5.
6. Chamiak, E. 1993. Statistical Language Learning, Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
7. Cunningham, H., Gaizauskas, R., & Wilks, Y. 1995. A General Architecture for Text Engineering (GATE) - A New Approach to Language Engineering R&D, Technical report CS - 95 - 21, University of Sheffield, http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/research/groups/nlp/gate/
8. Dahlgren, K., McDowell, J., & Stabler, E. 1989. Knowledge Representation for Common-sense Reasoning with Text. Journal of Computational Linguistics 15.3, 149–170.
9. Daelemans, W., Zavrel, J., Berck, P., & Gillis, S. 1996. MBT: A Memory-Based Part of Speech Tagger-Generator. In Ejerhed E. & Dagan I. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Very Large Corpora, Copenhagen, 14–27.
10. Daelemans, W., Zavrel, J., van der Sloot, K., & van den Bosch, A. 1999. TiMBL: Tilburg Memory Based Learner, version 2.0, Reference Guide, ILK Technical Report 99–101, Paper available from: http://ilk.kub.nl/-ilk/papers/ilk990Lps.gz
11. Hindle, D., & Rooth, M. 1993. Structural Ambiguity and Lexical Relations. Journal of Computational Linguistics 19.1, 103–120.
12. Hirst, G. 1987. Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Jensen, K., & Binot, J.-L. 1987. Disambiguating Prepositional Phrase Attachment by Using On-Line Dictionary Definitions. Journal of Computational Linguistics 13.3,4, 251–264.
14. Johansson-Kokkinakis, S., & Kokkinakis, D. 1996. Rule-Based Tagging in Sprakbanken, Research Reports from the Department of Swedish, Goteborg University, GU-ISS-96-5.
15. Kokkinakis, D. 1998. AVENTINUS, GATE and Swedish Lingware. In Proceedings of the 11th NODALIDA Conference, Nordiska Datalingvistikdagarna, Copenhagen, 22–33. Paper available from: http://www.nodali.sics.se/bibliotek/nodalida/1998_kph/
16. th EACL, Bergen, 245–248.
17. Kokkinakis, D., & Johansson-Kokkinakis, S. 1999. Sense-Tagging at the Cycle-Level Using GLDB, In Proceedings of the ‘Nordisk Forening i Lexikografi L NFL Symposium, Goteborg.
18. Kokkinakis, D., Toporowska Gronostaj, M., & Warmenius, K. 2000. Annotating, Dis-ambiguating & Automatically Extending the Coverage of the Swedish SIMPLE Lexicon. In Proceedings of the 2nd Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Athens, Hellas.
19. Malmgren, S. G. 1992. From Svenska ordbok (‘A dictionary of Swedish’) to National-encyklopediens-ordbok (‘The Dictionary of the National Encyclopedia’). In Tommola H., Varantola K., Salmi-Tolonen T. & Schopp J. (eds.), Proceedings of the EURALEX ‘92, Tampere, Finland, 2, 485-491.
20. Marcus, M., Santorini, B., & Marcinkiewicz, M. 1993. Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Journal of Computational Linguistics 19.2
21. Merlo, P., Crocker, K., & Berthouzoz, S. 1997. Attaching Multiple Prepositional Phrases: Generalized Backed-off Estimation. In Cardie C. & Weischedel R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on EMNLP, Rhode Island, 149–155.
22. Miller, G. A. (ed.) 1990. WordNet: An on-line Lexical Database. In International Journal of Lexicography, 3.4, Special Issue.
23. Mitchell, T. M. 1997. Machine Learning, McGraw-Hill Series on Computer Science.
24. NEO 1996. Natonalencyklopedinsordbok. Volumes 1–3, Sprakdata & Bra Bocker AB.
25. Ratnaparkhi, A., Reynar, J., & Roukos, S. 1994. A Maximun Entropy Model for Preposi-tional Phrase Attachment. In Proceedings of the ARPA Human Language Technology Workshop, 250–255, Paper available from: http://www.cis.upenn.edu/-adwait/statnlp.html
26. Roth, D. 1998. Learning to Resolve Language Ambiguities: A Unified Approach. In Proceedings of the A4AI-98. American Association of Artificial Intelligence, Madison, WI, USA.
27. Sinclair, J. M. 1992. The Automatic Analysis of Corpora. In Proceedings of the Nobel Symposium ‘82, Stockholm, Mouton de Groyter.
28. Stetina, J., & Nagao, M. 1997. Corpus Based PP Attachment Ambiguity Resolution with a Semantic Dictionary. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Very Large Corpora, China & Hong Kong, 66–80.
29. Sopena, J. M., Lloberas, A., & Moliner, J. L. 1998. A Connectionist Approach to Prepositional Phrase Attachment for Real World Texts. In Proceedings of the 17th COLING-36th ACL, Montreal Canada, 2, 1253–1257.
30. Whittemore, G., Ferrara, K., & Brunner, H. 1990. Empirical Study of Predicative Powers of Simple Attachment Schemes for Post-Modifier Prepositional Phrases. In Proceedings of the 28th ACL, Pittsburgh, PA, 25–30.
31. Yarowsky, D. 1994. A Comparison of Corpus-based techniques for Restoring Accents in Spanish and French Text. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Very Large Corpora, Kyoto, Japan, 19–32.
32. Zavrel, J., Daelemans, W., & Veenstra, J. 1997. Resolving PP attachment Ambiguities with Memory-Based Learning. In Elison M. (ed.), Proceedings of the Computational Natural Language Learning Conference, Madrid, 136–144.