Introduction: Defining discourse synthesis

Social Epistemology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 1-25

  McInnis, Raymond G ^a  

^a WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011152812     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: 14645297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02691729608578801     Document Type: Note

References (53)

1. Abrams, M. H. (1953), The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition, Oxford University Press, New York.
2. Allan, B., Qin, J. and Lancaster, F. W. (1994), ‘Persuasive communities: a longitudinal analysis of references in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1665-1990’, Social Papers of Science, 24, pp. 279-310.
3. Ausubel, D. P. (1964), ‘Some psychological aspects of the structure of knowledge,’ Education and the Structure of Knowledge (Fifth Annual Phi Delta Kappa Symposium on Educational Research), Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 221-249.
4. Bacon, F. ([1620] 1960), The New Organon, and Related Writings, Liberal Arts Press, New York.
5. Barron, P. and Narin, F. (1972), Analysis of research journals and related research structure in education. Final Report, Computer Horizons, Chicago.
6. Brittain, J. M. (1970), Information and its Users: A Review with Special Reference to the Social Sciences, Bath University Press, Bath.
7. Chambers, E. (1738), Cyclopaedia, London.
8. Cohen, H. F. (1994), The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. Cohen, I. B. (1985), The Scientific Revolution, Harvard University Press, Harvard.
10. Coleridge, S. T. (1976), The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Princeton University Press, Princeton, vol. 10.
11. Cronin, B. (1984), The Citation Process, Taylor Graham, London.
12. Descartes, R. (1985), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes', translated by J. Cottingham, D. Murdoch and R. Stoothoff, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, vol. 1.
13. Downs, R. M. (1981), ‘Maps and mappings for spatial representation’, in L. S. Liben, Patterson, A. H. and Newcombe, N. (eds), Spatial Representation and Behavior Across the Life Span, Academic Press, New York.
14. Eamon, W. (1990), ‘From secrets of nature to public knowledge’, in D. C. Lindberg and R. S. Westman (eds), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 333-365.
15. Farr, J. (1982), ‘Historical concepts in political science: the case of “Revolution”’, American Journal of Political Science, 26, pp. 688-708.
16. Fox, C., Porter, R. and Wokler, R. (eds) (1995), Inventing Human Science: Eighteenth Century Domains, University of California Press, Berkeley.
17. Fuller, S. (1988), Social Epistemology, University of Indiana Press, Bloomington.
18. Garfield, E. (1970), ‘Citation indexing, historio-bibliography and the sociology of sciences’, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Medical Librarianship, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp. 187-204.
19. Gilbert, G. N. (1976), ‘The transformation of research findings into scientific knowledge’, Social Studies of Science, 6, pp. 281-306.
20. Goldgar, A. (1995), Impolite Learning: Conduct and Community in the Republic of Letters, 1680-1750, Yale University Press, Yale.
21. Hamilton, W. (1859), Lectures on Metaphysics and Logic, vols 2 and 3, William Blackwood, Edinburgh.
22. Hill, C. (1990), A Nation of Change and Novelty, Routledge, New York, ch. 5.
23. Hume, D. ([1748] 1955), An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, edited, with an introduction by C. W. Hendel, Bobbs-Merrill Co, Indianapolis.
24. Inwood, M. J. (1992), A Hegel Dictionary, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
25. Kind, J. L. (1966), Edward Young in Germany, Columbia University Press, New York.
26. Knoblauch, C. H. and Brannon, L. (1984), Rhetorical Traditions and the Teaching of Writing, Boynton/Cook Publishers, Upper Montclair.
27. Kuhn, T. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd edn., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
28. Langer, S. (1953), Introduction to Symbolic Logic, Dover Publications, New York.
29. Langer, S. (1957), Philosophy in a New Key: A study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. Lewis, C. S. (1939), Rehabilitation and Other Essays, Oxford University Press, London.
31. Line, M. B. (1972), ‘Information services in academic libraries’, in C. M. Lincoln (ed.), Educating the Library User; Proceedings of the Fourth Triennial Meeting of the International Association of Technological University Libraries, Loughborough, April 1-3, 1970, University of Technology, Loughborough.
32. Locke, J. ([1690] 1975), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited with an introduction, critical apparatus and glossary by P. H. Nidditch, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
33. Mansel, H. (1860), Lectures on Metaphysics and Logic by Sir William Hamilton, vol. 3, William Blackwood and Sons, London.
34. Masson, D. (1862), ‘Universal information and “the English Cyclopedia”,’ Macmillian’s Magazine (March), pp. 357-370.
35. Masson, D. (1877), Recent British Philosophy, Macmillian and Co., London.
36. May, J. E. (1989), ‘A bibliography of secondary materials for the study of Edward Young’, Bulletin of Bibliography, 46, pp. 230-248.
37. McInnis, R. G. (1978), New Perspectives for Reference Service in Academic Libraries, Greenwood Press, Westport.
38. MgInnis, R. G. (1995), ‘The lexicography of scholary concepts’, in P. M. Baxter (ed.), Social Science Reference Services, Haworth, New York, pp. 27-56.
39. Puligandal, R. (1972), ‘The concept of evolution and revolution’, Philosophy Forum, 11, pp. 41-69.
40. Rose, M. (1988), ‘The author as proprietor: Donaldson v. Becket and the genealogy of modern authorship,’ Representations, 23, pp. 51-85.
41. Saiedi, N. (1993), The Birth of Social Theory: Social Thought in the Enlightenment and Romanticism, University Press of America, Lanham, MD.
42. Shapin, S. (1994), A Social History of Truth, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
43. Shils, E. (1968) ‘The concept of consensus’, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Macmillan, New York, vol. 3, pp. 260-266.
44. Small, H. G. (1978), ‘Cited documents as concept symbols’, Social Studies of Science, 3, pp. 327-340.
45. Smith, J. H. and Parks, E. W. (1951), The Great Critics: An Anthology of Literary Criticism, Norton, New York.
46. Sprat, T. ([1667] 1958), History of the Royal Society, edited with critical apparatus by Jackson I. Cope and Harold Whitmore Jones, Washington University, St. Louis.
47. Stewart, L. (1992), The Rise of Public Science: Rhetoric, Technology and Natural Philosophy in Newtonian Britain, 1660-1750, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
48. Tiles, M. and Tiles, J. (1993), An Introduction to Historical Epistemology: The Authority of Knowledge, Blackwell, Oxford.
49. Watts, I. ([1741] 1793), The Improvement of the Mind: or a Supplement to the Art of Logic, J. Lamson and T. Odiorne, Exeter, New Hampshire, pp. 49-51.
50. White, L. B. (1969), Early German Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
51. Woodmansee, M. (1984), ‘The genius and the copyright: economic and legal conditions of the emergence of the “author”’, Eighteenth Century Studies, 17, pp. 425-448.
52. Young, E. (1759), Conjectures on Original Composition, London.
53. Ziman, J. (1968), Public Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.