Social security—adequacy, equity, and progressiveness: a review of criteria based on experience in canada and the united states

North American Actuarial Journal

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-17

  Brown, Robert L ^a   Ip, Jeffrey ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b Buck Consultants   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011146209     PISSN: 10920277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2000.10595866     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Brown, Robert L. 1998. "Social Security: Reǵressive or Proǵressive?" North American Actuarial Journal 2, no. 2 (April):1–33.
2. Brown, Robert L. 1999. Economic Security for an Aǵinǵ Canadian Population. SOA Monoǵraph M-RS99-2. Schaumburg, Ill.: Society of Actuaries.
3. Duggan, James E., Gillingham, Robert, and Greenlees, John S. 1995. Proǵressive Returns to Social Security? An Answer from Social Security Returns. Research Paper No. 9501. Washinǵton, D.C.: Office of Economic Policy, U.S. Department of the Treasury.
4. Knox, David, and Cornish, Roslyn. 1997. The Development of Some Criteria for Equity in National Retirement Income Systems. Workinǵ Paper Series. University of Melbourne, Australia.
5. Rejda, George E. 1999. Social Insurance and Economic Security. 6th ed. Enǵlewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
6. Social Security Bulletin. 1996. Annual Statistical Supplement. Baltimore: U.S. Social Security Administration.