A correlational study of art-based measures of cognitive development: Clinical and research implications for art therapists working with children

Art Therapy

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 63-68

  Hagood, Maralynn M ^a  

^a HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011145348     PISSN: 07421656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07421656.2002.10129342     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson, F. E. (2001). Needed: A major collaborative effort. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 18(2), 74-78.
2. Art Therapy Credentials Board. (1994). Certification examination in art therapy: Bulletin of information. Mundelein, IL: American Art Therapy Association.
3. Blum, R. H. (1954). The validity of the Machover DAP technique: A study in clinical agreement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 10, 120.
4. Carvajal, H., McVey, S., Sellers, T., Weyand, K., & McKnab, P. (1987). Relationships between scores on the general purpose abbreviated battery of Stanford-Binet IV, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised, Columbia Mental Maturity Scale, and Goodenough-Harris Drawing Test. The Psychological Record, 127-130.
5. Case, C. (1990). Reflections and shadows: An exploration of the world of the rejected child. In C. Case & T. Dalley (Eds.), Working with children in art therapy (pp. 131-160). New York: Tavistock/Routledge.
6. Cohen-Liebman, M. S. (1994). The art therapist as expert witness in child sexual abuse litigation. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 11(4), 260-265.
7. Cohen-Liebman, M.S. (1995). Drawings as judiciary aids in child sexual abuse litigation. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 22(5), 475-483.
8. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Manual for the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test — Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
9. Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., & Whetton, C. (1982). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale. Windsor, United Kingdom: NFER-Nelson Publishing.
10. Fisher, S., & Fisher, R. (1950). Test of certain assumptions regarding figure drawing analysis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45, 727-732.
11. Foster, J. J. (1993). Starting SPSS/PC + and SPSS for Windows: A beginner's guide to data analysis (2nd. ed.). Wilmslow, United Kingdom: Sigma Press.
12. Goodenough, F. L. (1926). Drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
13. Hagood, M. M. (1999). The development of children’s drawings with reference to possible indicators of sexual abuse. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Edinburgh. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(04B), Publication #9922274, p. 18-52.
14. Hagood, M. M. (2000). The use of art in counselling child and adult survivors of sexual abuse. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
15. Hagood, M. M. (2002a). The use of the Naglieri Draw-A-Person Test for cognitive development: Clinical and research implications for art therapists. working with children. Manuscript submitted for publication.
16. Hagood, M. M. (2002b). “Sex abuse indicators” in drawings of nonabused children as features of normal cognitive development. Manuscript submitted for publication.
17. Harris, D. B. (1963). Children's drawings as measures of intellectual maturity: A revision and extension of the Goodenough Draw-A-Man Test. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
18. Howell, K. W., Zucker, S. H., & Moorhead, M. K. (1985). Multilevel Academic Survey Test. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
19. Isaac, S., & Michael, W B. (1985). Handbook in research and evaluation (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: EDITS.
20. Kaufman, B., & Wohl, A. (1992). Casualties of childhood: A developmental perspective on sexual abuse using projective drawings. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
21. Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children human figure drawings. New York: Grune & Stratton.
22. Levick, M. F., Safran, D. S., & Levine, A. J. (1990). Art therapist as expert witnesses: A judge delivers precedent-setting decision. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 17, 49-53.
23. Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection in the human figure (1st ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher, Ltd.
24. Moore, G. M. (1983). Developing and evaluating educational research. Boston: Little, Brown.
25. Naglieri, J. A. (1985). Matrix Analogies Test—Short Form. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
26. Naglieri, J. A. (1988). Draw-A-Person: A quantitative scoring system. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
27. Norusis, M. J. (1993). SPSS for Windows: Base system user's guide, Release 6.0. Chicago: SPSS.
28. Raven, J. C. (1958). Standard progressive matrices. London: Lewis.
29. Ribler, R. I. (1957). Diagnostic prediction from emphasis on the eye and the ear in human figure drawings. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 223-225.
30. Trowbridge, M. M. (1995). Graphic indicators of sexual abuse in children’s drawings: A review of the literature. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 22, 485-493.
31. Welkowitz, J. K., Ewen, R. B., & Cohen, J. (1976). Introductory statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd. ed.). London: Academic Press.
32. Williams, J. H. (1935). Validity and reliability of the Goodenough intelligence test. School and Society, 41, 653-656.
33. Wohl, A., & Kaufman, B. (1985). Silent screams and hidden cries: An interpretation of artwork by children from violent homes. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
34. Yepsen, L. N. (1929). The reliability of the Goodenough drawing test with feebleminded subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 20, 448-541.
35. Zazzo, R. (1948). Premiere contribution des psychologues scholaires a la psychologie differentielle des sex [A first contribution of school psychologists to the differential psychology of the sexes]. Enfance, I, 168-175.