The relationship between reading comprehension processes in L1 and L2

Reading Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 249-301

  Tang, Hua ^a  

^a Coquitlam School Board ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011137759     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: 15210685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0270271970180303     Document Type: Note

References (26)

1. Benedetto, R. A. (1984). A psycholinguistic investigation of the use of top-level organizational strategies in first and second language reading: Five case studies. New York University.
2. Benedetto, R. A. (1985). Language ability and the use of toplevel organization strategies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 266437).
3. Bernhardt, E. B. (1991a). Reading development in a second language. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
4. Bernhardt, E. B. (1991b). A psycholinguistic perspective on second language literacy. AILA Review, 8, 31-44.
5. Bernhardt, E. B., & Kamil, M. L. (1993). Relationships between L1 and L2 literaries: Consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Charleston, SC.
6. Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463-494.
7. Block, E. (1992). See how they read: comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 319-342.
8. Clarke, M. A. (1979). Reading in Spanish and English: Evidence from adult ESL students. Language Learning, 29, 121-150.
9. Clarke, M. A. (1980). The short circuit hypothesis of ESL reading: Or when language competence interferes with reading performance. Modern Language Journal, 64, 203-209.
10. Cummins, J. (1983). Heritage language education: A literature review. Toronto: Ministry of Education.
11. Cummins, J. (1984). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp.3-49). Los Angeles; Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University.
12. Cummins, J. (1991a). Interdependence of first- and secondlanguage proficiency in bilingual children. In E. Bialystok (Ed.) Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 70-89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Cummins, J. (1991b). Conversational and academic language proficiency in bilingual contexts. AILA Review, 8, 75-89.
14. Esling, J. & Downing, J. (1986). What do ESL students need to learn about reading? TESL Canada Journal, Special Issue, 1, 55-68.
15. Goodman, K. S. (1970). Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process. Journal of Typographic Research, 4, 103-110.
16. Goodman, K. S. (1971). Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process. In P. Pimsleur & T. Quinn (Eds.). The psycholinguistics of second language learning (pp.135-142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Goodman, K. S. (1973). Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process. In F. Smith (Ed.), Psycholinguistics and reading (pp.21-29). New York: Holt, Rinehartland Winston.
18. Koda, K. (1989). The effects of transferred vocabulary knowledge on the development of L2 reading proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 529-540.
19. Koda, K. (1990). The use of L1 strategies in L2 reading: Effects of L1 orthographic structures on L2 phonological recoding strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 393-410.
20. Olshavsky, J. E. (1976-1977). Reading as problem solving: An investigation of strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 12, 654-674.
21. O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press
22. Perfetti, C. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Rinbom, H. (1992). On L1 transfer in L2 comprehension and L2 production. Language Learning, 42, 85-112.
24. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1985). The transactional theory of the literacy work: Implications for research. In C.R. Cooper (Ed.), Reading response to literature and the teaching of literature: Points of departure (pp. 33-53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25. Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance, 6 (pp. 573-603). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Seliger, H. W. (1987). Second language research methods. Oxford University Press.