From the representation of publics to the performance of ‘lay political science’

Social Epistemology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 3-19

  Michael, Mike ^a   Brown, Nik ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011136895     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: 14645297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02691720050199261     Document Type: Note

References (38)

1. Beck, U. 1992, The Risk Society (London: Sage).
2. Billig, M. 1987, Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
3. Billig, M. 1991, Ideology and Opinions (London: Sage).
4. Billig, M. 1992, T alking of the Royal Family (London: Macmillan).
5. Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D and Radley, A. 1988, Ideological Dilemmas (London: Sage).
6. Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought, 1987.
7. Brown, N. 1998, OrderingHope: Representations of Xenotransplantation - An Actor/Actant Network Theory Account. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Independent Studies, Lancaster University.
8. Brown, N. and Michael, M. 1998, Transplanting Bodies, Knowledge and Morality: The Xenotransplantation Debate. Unpublished Paper.
9. Campbell, B. 1985. Uncertainty as symbolic action in disputes among experts. Social Studies of Science, 15, 429-453.
10. Davison, A., Barns, I. and Schibeci, R. 1997, Problematic publics: A critical review of surveys of public attitudes to biotechnology. Science, T ecnology andHuman Values, 22, 317-348.
11. Gabriel, Y. and Lang, T. 1995, The unmanageable consumer: contemporary consumption and its fragmentatim (London: Sage).
12. Giddens, A. 1991, Modernity and Self-Ideniity (Cambridge: Polity).
13. Gieryn, T. 1983, Boundary work in professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781-795.
14. Gieryn, T. 1995, Boundaries of Science, in S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson and T. Pinch (eds), Handbook of science and technology studies (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage) pp. 393-443.
15. Held, D. 1987, Models of Democracy. (Cambridge: Polity).
16. Hill, A. and Michael, M. 1998, Engineering acceptance: Representations of ‘the public’ in debates on biotechnologies, in P. Wheale (ed.), The Social Managemen of Genetic Engineering (London: Averbury) pp. 201-217.
17. Irwin, 1995, Citizen Science (London: Routledge).
18. IRWIN, A. and WYNNE, B. (eds) 1996, Misunderstanding Science? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
19. Keat, R., Whiteley, N. and Abercrombie, N. 1994, Introduction, in R. Keat, N. Whiteley, and N. Abercrombie (eds), T he Authority of the Consumer (London: Routledge) pp. 1-19.
20. Layton, D., Jenkins, E., MacGill, S. and Davey, A. 1993, Inarticulatescience? (Driffield, E. Yorks: Studies in Education Ltd).
21. Lyotard, J.-F. 1984, The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
22. Michael, M. 1996, Constructing Identities: T he Social, the Nonhuman and Change (London: Sage).
23. Michael, M. 1998, Between Citizen and Consumer: Multiplyingthe Meanings of the Public Understanding of Science. Public Understanding of Science, 7, 313-327.
24. Michael, M. and Birke, L. 1994a, Accounting for Animal Experiments: Credibility and Disreputable ‘ Others’. Science, Technology and Human Values, 19(2), 189-204.
25. Michael, M. and BIRKE, L. 1994b, Animal experimentation: Enrolling the Core Set. Social Studies of Science, 24, 81-95.
26. Michael, M. and Birke, L. 1995, Scientific Uncertainty, Public Unease and Animal Experiments. Sciencea Culture, 5(2) No 23, 249-277.
27. Miller, D. 1995, Consumption as the vanguard of history, in D. Miller (ed.), Acknowledging Consumption (London: Routledge) pp. 1-57.
28. Mulkay, M. 1991, Sociology of Science (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).
29. Pickering, A. 1995, The Mangle of Practice: time, agencyandscience. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).
30. Rose, N. 1996, Inventingour Selves: Psychdogy, PowerandPersonhood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
31. Royal Society of London. 1985, The public understanding of science (London: The Royal Society).
32. Saunders, P. 1993, Citizenship in a Liberal Society, in B. S. Turner (ed.), Citizenship and Social Theory (London: Sage).
33. Woolgar, S. 1988, Science, the very idea (Chichester: Ellis Horwood).
34. Wynne, B. E. 1989, Frameworks of rationality in risk management: Towards the testing of naive sociology, in J. Brown (ed.), Environmental Threats (London: Belhaven Press) pp. 33-47.
35. Wynne, B. E. 1991, Knowledges in context. Science, Technology and Human Values, 16, 111-121.
36. Wynne, B. E. 1992a, Public understanding of science research: New Horizons or hall of mirrors. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 37-43.
37. Wynne, B. E. 1992b, Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identitiesand public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 281-304.
38. Wynne, B. E. 1995, The public understanding of science, in S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson and T. Pinch (eds), Handbook of science and technology studies (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage) pp. 361-388.