Reflexivity, agency and constraint: The paradoxes of Bourdieu’s sociology of knowledge

Social Epistemology

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 171-186

  Bohman, James ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011135946     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: 14645297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02691729708578841     Document Type: Note

References (39)

1. MILLER, R. Fact and Method, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1987), p. 76ff.
2. BOHMAN, J. 'The limits of rational choice explanation', in J. COLEMAN and T. FARARO (eds), Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique, Russell Sage, Los Angeles (1991), pp. 207-228.
3. BOURDIEU, P. Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1977), pp. 5-6.
4. BOURDIEU, P. Language and Symbolic Power, Polity Press, Cambridge (1991), p. 43.
5. BOURDIEU (1991), p. 51 (see note 3).
6. BOURDIEU (1991), p. 51 (see note 3).
7. BOURDIEU (1977), pp. 72-77 (see note 2)
8. BOHMAN, J. New Philosophy of Social Science: Problems of Indeterminacy, MIT Press/Polity Press, Cambridge (1991), pp. 158-167.
9. BOURDIEU (1977), p. 55 (see note 2).
10. ELSTER, J. Sour Grapes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983), p. 126ff.
11. BOURDIEU (1991), p. 51 (see note 3).
12. GARFINKEL, A. in Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1967), p.
13. For this claim, see BOURDIEU, P. Questions de Sociologie, edition de Minuit, Paris (1980), p. 13
14. BOURDIEU, P. and WACQUANT, L. J. D. Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1992), p. xiv and pp. 50-51
15. BOURDIEU, P. The Logic of Practice, (1990)
16. SEN, A. Poverty and Famines, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1981).
17. BOURDIEU and WACQUANT (1992), pp. 36-37 (see note 11).
18. BOURDIEU (1990), pp. 20-21 (see note 11).
19. Cultural Anthropology, 5 (1990), pp. 380-391.
20. HONNETH, A. ' Die zerissene Welt der symbolischen Formen: Zum kultursoziologischen Werk Pierre Bourdieus', in Die zerissene Welt des Sozialen, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt (1990), pp. 156-181.
21. BOURDIEU(1991), pp. 43-65 and pp. 107-116, respectively (see note 3).
22. BOURDIEU(1991), p. 55 (see note 3).
23. HABERMAS, J. Theory of Communicative Action, vol. I, Beacon Press, Boston (1984), p. 278.
24. BOURDIEU(1991), pp. 31, 107-116 or 170 (see note 3)
25. BOURDIEU and WACQUANT (1992), pp. 147-148 (see note 11).
26. BOURDIEU(1991), p. 75 (see note 3).
27. BOURDIEU(1991), p. 170 (see note 3)
28. BOURDIEU(1991), p. 277, footnote 8 (see note 3)
29. BOURDIEUand WACQUANT (1992), pp. 147-148 (see note 11)
30. HABERMAS, J. 'What is universal pragmatics?', Communication and the Evolution of Society, Beacon Press, Boston (1979), pp. 38-39.
31. HABERMAS (1984) vol. I, p. 287ff (see note 17).
32. BOURDIEU(1991), p. 54 (see note 3).
33. BOURDIEU(1991), p. 138ff (see note 3).
34. BOURDIEU(1991), p. 170 (see note 3).
35. BOURDIEU(1991), p. 129 (see note 3).
36. BOURDIEU(1991), p. 129 (see note 3)
37. BOHMAN, 'World disclosure and radical criticism', Thesis Eleven, 37 (1994), pp. 82-97.
38. BOURDIEU (1991), p. 129 (see note 3).
39. TURNER, S. Social Theory of Practices, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1993) in History and Theory, 36 (1997), 93-107.