The effects of rereading, self-selected strategy use, and rehearsal on the immediate and delayed understanding of text

Reading Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 137-157

  Nist, Sherrie L ^a   Sharman, Sandra J ^a   Holschuh, Jodi L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011135175     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: 15210685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0270271960170202     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375-404.
2. Bowers, P. G. (1993). Text reading and rereading: Determinants of fluency beyond word recognition. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 133-153.
3. Carver, R. P., & Hoffman, J. V. (1981). The effect of practice through repeated reading on gains in reading ability using a computer based instructional system. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 374-390.
4. Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 448-456.
5. Dickinson, D. J., & O'Connell, D. Q. (1990). Effect of quality and quantity of study on student grades. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 227-231.
6. Frazier, D. W. (1993). Transfer of college developmental reading students' textmarking strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 17-41.
7. Garner, R. (1988). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8. Idstein, P. I., & Jenkins, J. R. (1972). Underlining versus repetitive reading. The Journal of Educational Research,35, 321-323.
9. McWhorter, J. Y. (1994). Processes and learning strategies: What works for postsecondary students. In E. G. Sturtevant & W. M. Linek (Eds.), Pathways for Literacy: Learners Teach and Teachers Learn, Sixteenth Yearbook of the College Reading Association (pp.127-138). Pittsburg, KS: College Reading Association.
10. Nist, S. L., & Kirby, K. (1989). The text marking patterns of college students. Reading Psychology, 10, 321-338.
11. Nist, S. L., Simpson, M. L., Olejnik, S., & Mealey, D. L. (1991). The relation between self-selected study processes and test performance. American Educational Research Journal,28, 849-874.
12. O'Shea, L. J., Sindelar, P. T., & O'Shea, D. J. (1985). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 129-142.
13. Paris, S., Lipson, M., & Wixson, K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.
14. Shirey, L. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (1988). Effect of interest on attention and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 448-456.
15. Simpson, M. L., Olejnik, S., Tarn, A. Y., & Supattathym, S. (1994). Elaborative verbal rehearsals and college students' cognitive performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 267-278.
16. Stahl, N. A., Simpson, M. L., & Hayes, C. G. (1992). Ten recommendations from research for teaching high-risk college students. Journal of Developmental Education, 16, 2-10.
17. Wade, S. E. (1990). How interest affects learning from text (Technical Report No. 143). Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 321 237)
18. Wade, S. E., & Trathen, W. (1989). Effect of self-selected study methods on learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 40-47.
19. Weinstein, C. A., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.