Oligopoly behaviour in the trans-tasman air travel market: The case of kiwi international

New Zealand Economic Papers

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-25

  Haugh, David ^a   Hazledine, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011134647     PISSN: 00779954     EISSN: 19434863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00779959909544295     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Areeda, P. and Turner, D. (1975), ‘Predatory Pricing and Related Practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Act’, Harvard Law Review, 88, 697-733.
2. Australian Department of Transport and Regional Development, Air Transport Statistics, International Scheduled Air Transport, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, Canberra
3. Baumol, W. (1979), ‘Quasi-Permanence of Price Reductions: A policy for Prevention of Predatory Pricing’, The Yale Law Journal, 89, No. 1, November 1979, 1-26
4. Baumol, W. (1996), ‘Predation and the Logic of the Average Variable Cost Test’, Journal of Law and Economics, 49-72
5. Brander, James A. and Anming Zhang (1990), ‘Market conduct in the airline industry: an empirical investigation’, Rand Journal of Economics, 20, No. 4, 567-583.
6. Bureau of Competition Policy (1992), Predatory Pricing Enforcement Guidelines, Consumer and Corporate Affairs, Ottawa
7. Bureau of Transport and Communications Economics (1995), Demand Elasticities for Air Travel to and from Australia, Working Paper 20, Australian Publishing Service, Canberra
8. Bureau of Transport and Communications Economics (1994), International Aviation, BTCE Report 86, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra
9. Commerce Commission (1997), Termination Report: Kiwi International Airlines/Air NZ, Wellington
10. Dresner, Martin, Jiun-Sheng Chris Lin and Robert Windle (1996), ‘The Impact of Low-Cost Carriers on Airport and Route Competition’, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, September 1996
11. Easterbrook, F. (1981), ‘Predatory Strategies and Counterstrategies’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 48, 263-337
12. Haugh, David and Tim Hazledine (1999), ‘Oligopoly Behaviour in the Trans-Tasman Air Travel Market: the case of Kiwi International’, Economics Department, University of Auckland, Working Paper 190.
13. Joskow, P. and Klevorick, A. (1979), ‘A Framework for Analyzing Predatory Pricing Policy’, The Yale Law Journal, 89, No.2, 213-270
14. Lefever, T. (1981), Predatory Pricing Rules: A Comment on Williamson’s Output Restriction Rule, The Yale Law Journal, 90, 1639-1645
15. McGee, J. (1980), ‘Predatory Pricing Revisited’, Journal of Law and Economics, 290-330
16. Van Roy, Y. (1991), Guidebook to New Zealand Competition Laws, Auckland, CCU New Zealand Limited.
17. Williamson, O. (1977) ‘Predatory Pricing: A Strategic and Welfare Analysis’, 87, 284-340
18. Williamson, O. (1981), ‘Reply to Lefever’, The Yale Law Journal, 90, 1646-1649