Making the Right Treatment Decision Requires Consideration of Utility and Reconsideration of Value

Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 239-241

  Rossi, Michael J ^a   Lubowitz, James H ^a   Brand, Jefferson C ^a   Provencher, Matthew T ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE REPORT; CLINICAL OUTCOME; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; MEDICINE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SURGEON; ARTHROSCOPY; DECISION MAKING; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME;

ARTHROSCOPY; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

EID: 85011072147     PISSN: 07498063     EISSN: 15263231     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.11.018     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. 1 Roche, S.J., Funk, L., Sciascia, A., Kibler, W.B., Scapular dyskinesis: the surgeon's perspective. Shoulder Elbow 7 (2015), 289–297.
2. 2 Kibler, W.B., Sciascia, A.D., Hester, P., Dome, D., Jacobs, C., Clinical utility of traditional and new tests in the diagnosis of biceps tendon injuries and superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions in the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 37 (2009), 1840–1847.
3. 3 Kibler, W.B., Sciascia, A., Current practice for the surgical treatment of SLAP lesions: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 32 (2016), 669–683.
4. 4 Kibler, W.B., Sciascia, A., Current practice for the diagnosis of a SLAP lesion: systematic review and physician survey. Arthroscopy 31 (2015), 2456–2469.
5. 5 Kibler, W.B., Kuhn, J.E., Wilk, K., et al. The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology—10-year update. Arthroscopy 29 (2013), 141–161.e26.
6. 6 Kibler, W.B., Value on the front end: Making the effective diagnosis for optimal treatment. Arthroscopy 33 (2017), 493–495.
7. 7 Rossi, M.J., Brand, J.C., Provencher, M.T., Lubowitz, J.H., The expectation game: patient comprehension is a determinant of outcome. Arthroscopy 31 (2015), 2283–2284.
8. 8 Rossi, M.J., Brand, J.C., Provencher, M.T., Lubowitz, J.H., Shoulder arthroscopy complication and readmission rates: Impact on value. Arthroscopy 33 (2017), 4–5.
9. 9 Warner JJP. Defining value in shoulder care: what you should know in 2014. Presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the Arthroscopy Association of North America, Hollywood, FL, May 1-3, 2014.
10. 10 Porter, M.E., What is value in health care?. N Engl J Med 363 (2010), 2477–2481.
11. 11 Srikumaran, U., Hannan, C., Higgins, L., Warner, J., Value and health care policy ramifications of rotator cuff repair. Symposium. Techn Orthopaed 31 (2016), 120–126.
12. 12 Higgins, L.D., Editorial commentary: Cost-effectiveness of orthopaedic procedures: “A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore”—Yogi Berra. Arthroscopy 32 (2016), 1781–1783.
13. 13 Lubowitz, J.H., Provencher, M.T., Poehling, G.G., et al. Measuring orthopaedic outcome: shoulder outcome measures. Arthroscopy 29 (2013), 791–793.
14. 14 Roller, A.S., Mounts, R.A., DeLong, J.M., Hanypsiak, B.T., Outcome instruments for the shoulder. Arthroscopy 29 (2013), 955–964.
15. 15 Porter, M.E., Larsson, S., Lee, T.H., Standardizing patient outcomes measurement. N Engl J Med 374 (2016), 504–506.
16. 16 Bernstein, P., Against the gods: the remarkable story of risk. 1996, John Wiley & Sons, New York.