Rethinking researcher roles, responsibilities, and relationships in community development research

Leisure/ Loisir

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 437-446

  Frisby, Wendy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Action research; Community development; Researcher roles

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010970197     PISSN: 14927713     EISSN: 21512221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14927713.2006.9651364     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alvesson, M., and Skoldberg, K., 2000. Reflexive methodology:New vistas for qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
2. Arai, S.M., and Reid, D.G., 2003. Impacts of a neo-liberal policy shift on citizenship and the voluntary sector:A policy delphi with social planning organizations. Canadian Review of Social Policy, 52 Fall/Winter:67–92.
3. Berner, E., and Phillips, B., 2005. Left to their own devices? Community self-help between alternative development and neo-liberalism. Community Development Journal, 40(1):17–29.
4. Coburn, D., 2004. Beyond the income inequality hypothesis:Class, neo-liberalism and health inequalities. Social Science and Medicine, 58:41–56.
5. Frisby, W., and Millar, S., 2002. The actualities of doing community development to promote the inclusion of low income populations in local sport and recreation. European Sport Management Quarterly, 2:209–233.
6. Frisby, W., Reid, C., Millar, S., and Hoeber, L., 2005. Putting “participatory” into participatory forms of action research. Journal of Sport Management, 19(4):367–386.
7. Frisby, W., Reid, C., and Ponic, P., 2006. “ Levelling the playing field:Promoting the health of poor women through a community development approach to recreation ”. In Sport and Gender in Canada, Edited by:White, P., and Young, K., 129–136. Don Mills, ON:Oxford University Press.
8. Ledwith, M., and Asgill, P., 2000. Critical alliance:Black and white women working together for social justice. Community Development Journal, 35(3):290–299.
9. Maguire, P., 2001. “ Uneven ground:Feminisms and action research ”. In Handbook of action research:Participative inquiry and practice, Edited by:Reason, P., and Bradbury, H., 59–69. London:Sage.
10. Nelson, G.N., and Prilleltensky, I., 2005. Community psychology:In pursuit of liberation and well-being, New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Raphael, D., 2001. Inequality is bad for our hearts:Why low income and social exclusion are major causes of heart disease in Canada, Toronto, ON:North York Heart Health Network.
12. Reid, C., 2000. Seduction and enlightenment in feminist action research. Resources for Feminist Research, 28(1/2):169–188.
13. Reid, C., Frisby, W., and Ponic, P., 2002. Confronting two-tiered community recreation and poor women's exclusion:Promoting inclusion, health, and social justice. Canadian Women's Studies, Special Issue on Women and Sport, 21(3):88–94.
14. Reid, C., 2004. The wounds of exclusion:Poverty, women's health, and social justice, Edmonton, AB:Qualitative Institute Press.
15. Ristock, J.L., and Pennell, J., 1996. Community research as empowerment:Feminist links, postmodern interruptions, Toronto, ON:Oxford University Press.
16. Spatig, L., Seelinger, K., Dillon, A., Parrott, L., and Conrad, K., 2005. From an ethnographic team to a feminist learning community:A reflective tale. Human Organization, 64(1):103–113.
17. Williams, J., and Lykes, M.B., 2003. Bridging theory and practice:Using reflexive cycles in feminist participatory action research. Feminism & Psychology, 13(3):287–294.
18. Yoshihama, M., and Carr, E.S., 2002. Community participation reconsidered:Feminist participatory action research with Hmong women. Journal of Community Practice, 10(4):85–103.