Reproductive biology of Psychotria poeppigiana Mull. Arg. (Rubiaceae) in gallery forest;Biologia reprodutiva de Psychotria poeppigiana Mull. Arg. (Rubiaceae) em mata de galeria

Acta Botanica Brasilica

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 481-489

  Coelho, Christiano Peres ^a   Barbosa, Ana Angélica Almeida ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Distyly; Gallery forest; Pollination; Psychotria; Self incompatible

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010744851     PISSN: 01023306     EISSN: 1677941X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0102-33062004000300008     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Augspurger, C.K. 1983. Phenology, flowering synchrony, and fruit set of six neotropical shrubs. Biotropica 15(4): 257-267.
2. Baker, H.G. 1958. Studies in the reproductive biology of West African Rubiaceae. Journal of the West African Science Association 4: 9-24.
3. Barrett, S.C.H. 1992. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
4. Barrett, S.C.H. & Richards, J.H. 1990. Heterostyly in tropical plants. Memoirs of New York Botanical Garden 55: 35-61.
5. Barrett, S.C.H. & Shore, J.S. 1987. Variation and evolution of breeding systems in Turnera ulmifolia L. complex (Turneraceae). Evolution 41: 340-354.
6. Barros, M.A.G. 1989. Studies on the pollination biology and breeding systems of some genera with sympatric species in the Brazilian Cerrados. PhD thesis, University of St. Andrews, Scotland. UK.
7. Bawa, K.S. & Beach, J.H. 1983. Self-incompatibility systems in the Rubiaceae of a tropical lowland wet forest. American Journal of Botany 70: 1281-1288.
8. Burger, W.C. & Taylor, C.M. 1993. Flora costaricensis. Fieldiana 33: 1-333.
9. Contreras, P.S. & Ornelas, J.F. 1999. Reproductive conflicts of Palicourea padifolia (Rubiaceae) a distylous shrub of a tropical cloud forest in Mexico. Plant Systematics and Evolution 219: 225-241.
10. Cruden, R.W. 1977. Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31: 32-46.
11. Davis, A.P.; Bridson, D.; Jarvis, C. & Govaerts, R. 2001. The typification and characterization of genus Psychotria L. (Rubiaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 135: 35-42.
12. Faegri, K. & Pijl, L. van der. 1980. The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
13. Fournier, L. 1974. Un método cuantitativo para la medición de características fenológicas en árboles. Turrialba 24(4): 422-423.
14. Ganders, F.R. 1979. The biology of heterostyly. New Zealand Journal of Botany 17: 607-35.
15. Gibbs, P.E. 1986. Do homomorphic and heteromorphic self-incompatibility systems have the same sporophytic mechanism Plant Systematics and Evolution 154: 285-323.
16. Grandisioli, E.A.C. 1997. Biologia Reprodutiva e Estrutura da População de Psychotria suterella Muell. Arg. (Rubiaceae) em um fragmento de Mata secundária em São Paulo (SP). Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade de São Paulo.
17. Grantsau, R. 1989. Os beija-flores do Brasil. Expressão e Cultura, Rio de Janeiro.
18. Hamilton, C.W. 1990. Variation on a distylous Theme in Mesoamerican Psychotria subgenus Psychotria (Rubiaceae). Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 55: 62-75.
19. Kearns, C.A. & Inouye, D.W. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot.
20. Kohn, J.R. & Barrett, S.C.H. 1992. Experimental studies on the functional significance of heterostyly. Evolution 46(1): 43-55.
21. Lima, H.A. 1986. Contribuição ao estudo da biologia floral, da fenologia e do sistema de reprodução de Psychotria leiocarpa Cam. et Schl. (Rubiaceae). Dissertação de Mestrado. Rio de Janeiro, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
22. Lloyd, D.G. & Webb, C.J. 1992. The evolution of heterostyly. In: S.C.H. Barrett (ed.). Evolution and Function of Heterostyly. Springer Verlag.
23. Martin, F.N. 1959. Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technology 34: 125-128.
24. Martin-Gajardo, I.S. 1999. Padrões fenológicos de Rubiaceae no sub-bosque de Floresta Atlântica. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade Estadual Paulista.
25. Murray, B.G. 1990. Heterostyly and pollen-tube interactions in Luculia gratissima (Rubiaceae). Annals of Botany 65: 691-698.
26. Newstrom, L.E.; Frankie, G.W. & Baker, H.G. 1994. A new classification for plant phenology based on flowering patterns in lowland tropical rain forest trees in La Selva, Costa Rica. Biotropica 26(2): 141-159.
27. Pailler, T.; Humeau, L. & Figier, J. 1998. Reproductive trait variation in the functionally dioecious and morphologically heterostylous island endemic Chassalia corallioides (Rubiaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 64: 297-313.
28. Passos, L. & Sazima, M. 1995. Reproductive biology of the distylous Manettia luteo-rubra (Rubiaceae). Botanic Acta 108: 309-313.
29. Ree, R.H. 1997. Pollen flow, fecundity and the adaptive significance of heterostyly in Palicourea padifolia (Rubiaceae). Biotropica 29(3): 298-308.
30. Richards, A.J. 1986. Plant breeding systems. Allen & Unwin, London.
31. Silva, A.P. 1995. Biologia Reprodutiva e Polinização de Palicourea rigida H.B.K. (Rubiaceae). Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade de Brasília.
32. Sobrevila, C.; Ramirez, N. & Enrech, N.X. 1983. Reproductive biology of Palicourea fendleri and P. petiolaris (Rubiaceae) heterostylous shrubs of a tropical cloud forest in Venezuela. Biotropica 15: 161-169.
33. Taylor, C.M. 1996. Overview of Psychotrieae (Rubiaceae) in the Neotropics. Opera Botanica Belgica 7: 261-270.