Justification, Coherence, and Epistemic Responsibility in Legal Fact-Finding

Episteme

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 306-319

  Amaya, Amalia ^a  

^a EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010695825     PISSN: 17423600     EISSN: 17500117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3366/E1742360008000415     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allen Ronald. 1997. “Rationality, Algorithms, and Juridical Proof.” International Journal of Evidence and Proof 1: 254–75.
2. Amaya Amalia. 2009. Forthcoming. “Inference to the Best Legal Explanation.” In Kaptein H., Prakken H., & Verheij B. (eds.), Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
3. Audi Robert. 2001. “Epistemic Virtue and Justi.ed Belief.” In Fairweather A. & Zagzebski L. (eds.), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility, pp. 82–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. BonJour Laurence. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Code Lorraine. 1987. Epistemic Responsibility. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
6. Conte Maria Elisabeth. 1989. “Coherence in Interpretation.” In Heydrich W., et al((eds.), Connexity and Coherence: Analysis of Text and Discourse, pp. 275–82. Berlin: DeGruyter.
7. Damaška Mirjan. 1997. Evidence Law Adrift. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8. Dworkin Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. London: Fontana.
9. Feldman Richard. 2002. “Epistemological Duties.” In Moser P. K. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, pp. 362–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Forster Edward Morgan. 2000. Howards End. London: Penguin Books.
11. Greco John. 2001. “Virtues and Rules in Epistemology.” In Fairweather A. & Zagzebski L. (eds.), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility, pp. 117–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Greco John. 2002. “Virtues in Epistemology.” In Moser P. K. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, pp. 287–315. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Harman Gilbert. 1986. Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Hastie Reid & Nancy Pennington. 1991. “A Cognitive Theory of Juror Decision-Making: The Story Model.” Cardozo Law Review 13: 519–57.
15. Hookway Christopher. 2003. “How to Be a Virtue Epistemologist.” In DePaul M. & Zagzebski L. (eds.), Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology, pp. 183–202. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16. Jackson Bernard. 1988. Law, Fact, and Narrative Coherence. Merseyside: Deborah Charles Publications.
17. Jackson John & Sean Doran. 1995. Judge without Jury: Diplock Trials in the Adversary System. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18. Lehrer Keith. 2000. Theory of Knowledge. 2nd ed. Boulder: Westview Press.
19. Lipton Peter. 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
20. Lycan William. 1988. Judgment and Justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Lycan William. 1996. “Plantinga and Coherentisms.” In Kvanvig J. L. (ed.), Warrant and Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Plantinga's Theory of Knowledge, pp. 3–23. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
22. MacCormick Neil. 2005. Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Montmarquet James. 1993. Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
24. Moravcsik Julius. 1990. Thought and Language. London: Routledge.
25. Paul Richard. 2000. “Critical Thinking, Moral Integrity and Citizenship: Teaching for the Intellectual Virtues.” In Axtell G. (ed.), Knowledge, Belief, and Character: Readings in Virtue Epistemology, pp. 163–75. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
26. Plantinga Alvin. 1993. Warrant: The Current Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Samet Jerry & Roger Schank. 1984. “Coherence and Connectivity.” Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 57–82.
28. Simon Dan. 1998. “A Psychological Model of Judicial Decision-Making.” Rutgers Law Journal 30: 1–142.
29. Simon Dan. 2004. “A Third View of the Black Box: Cognitive Coherence in Legal Decision-Making.” The University of Chicago Law Review 71: 511–86.
30. Thagard Paul. 2000. Coherence in Thought and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Zagzebski Linda. 1996. Virtues of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Ziff Paul. 1984. “Coherence.” Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 31–42.