Making sense of replications

eLife

Volumn 6, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Nosek, Brian A ^a   Errington, Timothy M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR OPEN SCIENCE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; CANCER RESEARCH; PRECLINICAL STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; GENETICS; HUMAN; NEOPLASM; RESEARCH;

HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH;

EID: 85010695261     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.23383     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ES, Munafo` MR. 2013. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14:365-376. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475
2. Chambers CD. 2013. Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex 49:609-610. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016
3. Cohen J. 1969. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press.
4. Ebersole CR, Alaei R, Atherton OE, Bernstein MJ, Brown M, Chartier CR, Chung LY, Hermann AD, Joy-Gaba JA, Line MJ, Rule NO, Sacco DF, Vaughn LA, Nosek BA. 2017. Observe, hypothesize, test, repeat: Luttrell, Petty and Xu (2017) demonstrate good science. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 69:184-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.12.005
5. Errington TM, Iorns E, Gunn W, Tan FE, Lomax J, Nosek BA. 2014. An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research. eLife 3: e04333. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04333
6. Hines WC, Su Y, Kuhn I, Polyak K, Bissell MJ. 2014. Sorting out the FACS: a devil in the details. Cell Reports 6:779-781. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.02.021
7. Nosek BA, Lakens D. 2014. Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology 45:137-141. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
8. Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler SJ, Buck S, Chambers CD, Chin G, Christensen G, Contestabile M, Dafoe A, Eich E, Freese J, Glennerster R, Goroff D, Green DP, Hesse B, Humphreys M, Ishiyama J, et al. 2015. Promoting an open research culture. Science 348:1422-1425. doi: 10.1126/science.aab2374
9. Open Science Collaboration. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349:aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716
10. Peterson NC. 2008. From bench to cageside: Risk assessment for rodent pathogen contamination of cells and biologics. ILAR Journal 49:310-315. doi: 10.1093/ilar.49.3.310
11. Schmidt S. 2009. Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology 13: 90-100. doi: 10.1037/a0015108
12. Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U. 2011. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science 22:1359-1366. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632
13. Valentine JC, Biglan A, Boruch RF, Castro FG, Collins LM, Flay BR, Kellam S, Mościcki EK, Schinke SP. 2011. Replication in prevention science. Prevention Science 12:103-117. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0217-6