Wood pellets, what else? Greenhouse gas parity times of European electricity from wood pellets produced in the south-eastern United States using different softwood feedstocks

GCB Bioenergy

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 1406-1422

  Hanssen, Steef V ^a,b   Duden, Anna S ^b   Junginger, Martin ^b   Dale, Virginia H ^c   van der Hilst, Floor ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

bioenergy; biomass; carbon; counterfactual; forest; GHG emission; parity time; payback time; US South

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CARBON; ENERGY POLICY; FEEDSTOCKS; FORESTRY; GAS EMISSIONS; GAS PLANTS; LAND USE; PELLETIZING; SOFTWOODS; SUPPLY CHAINS; WOOD;

BIO-ENERGY; COUNTERFACTUAL; FOREST; GHG EMISSION; PARITY TIME; PAYBACK TIME;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; EMISSION; EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GAS; PLANT RESIDUE; THINNING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 85010660560     PISSN: 17571693     EISSN: 17571707     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12426     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Abt KL, Abt RC, Galik CS, Skog KE (2014) Effect of Policies on Pellet Production and Forests in the U. S. South. USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, USA.
2. Aebiom (2013) Forest Sustainability and Carbon Balance of EU Importation of North American Forest Biomass for Bioenergy Production. European Biomass Association, Brussels.
3. Aebiom (2015) Statistical Report European Bioenergy Outlook 2015. European Biomass Association, Brussels.
4. Berndes G, Ahlgren S, Borjesson P, Cowie AL (2013) Bioenergy and land use change-state of the art. WIRES Energy and Environment, 2, 282–303.
5. 2 measurements to estimate the timing and magnitude of greenhouse gas mitigation potential of forest bioenergy. GCB Bioenergy, 5, 67–72.
6. Bright RM (2015) Metrics for biogeophysical climate forcings from land use and land cover changes and their inclusion in life cycle assessment: a critical review. Environmental Science & Technology, 49, 3291–3303.
7. Buchholz T, Gunn J (2015) Carbon Emission Estimates for Drax Biomass Powerplants in the UK Sourcing From Enviva Pellet Mills in U. S. Southeastern Hardwoods Using the BEAC Model, Spatial Informatics Group LLC, Northampton, CT, USA.
8. Buchholz T, Prisley S, Marland G, Canham C, Sampson N (2014) Uncertainty in projecting GHG emissions from bioenergy. Nature Climate Change, 4, 1045–1047.
9. Buchholz T, Hurteau M, Gunn J, Saah D (2015) A global meta-analysis of forest bioenergy greenhouse gas emissions accounting studies. GCB Bioenergy, 8, 1–9.
10. Cadman J, Evans S, Holland M, Boyd R (2005) Scotland Environment Group Research Report. Proposed Plastic Bag Levy – Extended Impact Assessment Final Report. Edinburgh, United Kingdom. [Online] Available at: http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2005/08/1993154/31553 (accessed 1 March 2016).
11. Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Woess-Gallasch S (2009) Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53, 434–447.
12. Cherubini F, Strømman AH, Hertwich E (2011) Effects of boreal forest management practices on the climate impact of CO2 emissions from bioenergy. Ecological Modelling, 223 (1), 59–66.
13. 2 for bioenergy: contributions from carbon fluxes and albedo dynamics. Environmental Research Letters, 7, 1–11.
14. Colnes A, Doshi K, Emick H et al. (2012) Biomass Supply and Carbon Accounting for Southeastern Forests. Biomass Energy Resource Centre, Monpelier, VT, USA.
15. Daioglou V, Stehfest E, Wicke B, Faaij A, Van Vuuren DP (2015) Projections of the availability and cost of residues from agriculture and forestry. GCB Bioenergy, 8, 456–470.
16. Dunn CJ, Bailey JD (2012) Temporal dynamics and decay of coarse wood in early seral habitats of dry-mixed conifer forests in Oregon's Eastern Cascades. Forest Ecology and Management, 276, 71–81.
17. Dwivedi P, Khanna M (2014) Abatement cost of GHG emissions for wood-based electricity and ethanol at production and consumption levels. PLoS ONE, 9 (6), 1–14.
18. Dwivedi P, Khanna M (2015) Abatement cost of wood-based energy products at the production level on afforested and reforested lands. GCB Bioenergy, 7, 945–957.
19. Dwivedi P, Bailis R, Bush TG, Marinescu M (2011) Quantifying GWI of wood pellet production in the Southern United States and its subsequent utilization for electricity production in the Netherlands/Florida. Bioenergy Research, 4, 180–192.
20. Dwivedi P, Khanna M, Bailis R, Ghilardi A (2014a) Potential greenhouse gas benefits of transatlantic wood pellet trade. Environmental Research Letters, 9, 24007.
21. Dwivedi P, Bailis R, Khanna M (2014b) Is use of both pulpwood and logging residues instead of only logging residues for bioenergy development a viable carbon mitigation strategy? Bioenergy Research, 7, 217–231.
22. Dwivedi P, Khanna M, Sharma A, Susaeta A (2016) Efficacy of carbon and bioenergy markets in mitigating carbon emissions on reforested lands: a case study from Southern United States. Forest Policy and Economics, 67, 1–9.
23. EIA (2014) U.S. wood pellet exports double in 2013 in response to growing European demand. United States Energy Information Agency. [Online] Available at: http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=16391&src=email (accessed 14 December 2016).
24. Ellen-MacArthur Foundation (2013) Towards the circular economy – economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. [Online] Available at: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications (accessed 24 July 2016).
25. Enviva (2015) Enviva Wood Fiber Sources. [Online] Available at: http://www.envivabiomass.com/sustainability/enviva-wood-fiber-resources/ (accesed 23 November 2015).
26. EPA (2013) Assessing Trends in Material Generation, Recycling and Disposal in the United States. US Environmental Protection Agency. Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: 2013 Fact Sheet. [Online] Available at: https://www.epa.gov/smm/advancing-sustainable-materials-management-facts-and-figures-report (accessed 1 March 2016).
27. ERPC (2015). Paper recycling. European Recovered Paper Council. Monitoring Report 2014 Brussels. [Online] Available at: http://www.paperrecovery.org/publications/erpc-publications (accessed 7 March 2016).
28. European Parliament and EU Council, Directive 2009/28/EC (23 April 2009) on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources. Official Journal of the European Union, L 140 (EN), 16–62.
29. Eurostat (2015) Forestry statistics in detail. [Online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Forestry_statistics_in_detail (accessed 14 December 2016).
30. Eurostat (2016) Complete energy balances annual data (table 2). [Online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Renewable_energy_statistics (accessed 14 December 2016).
31. FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2016) Forest product statistics [Online] Available at: http://www.fao.org/forestry/statistics/80938/en/ (accessed 12 December 2016).
32. Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science, 319, 1235–1238.
33. FIA USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis national program (2016) [Online] Available at: http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/tools-data/ (accessed 3 February 2016).
34. Fingerman K, Iriarte L, Fritsche UR et al. (2016) Biomass use and potential for export to the European Union from 2015-2030 United States Southeast – Case Study. BioTrade2020plus deliverable WP3. [Online] Available at: http://www.biotrade2020plus.eu/images/IINAS_et_al_2016_WP_3_case_study_report_US_Southeast_FINAL.PDF (accessed 23 July 2016).
35. Forest2market.com (2014) Southwide Timber Prices. [Online] Available at: http://www.forest2market.com/blog/southwide-timber-prices-january-february-2014 (accessed 23 November 2015).
36. Forest2Market (2016) Export Industry's Impacts on Southern Forests, Markets. In: Biomass Magazine. [Online] Available at: http://www.biomassmagazine.com/articles/13137/export-industryundefineds-impacts-on-southern-forests-markets (accessed: 3 May 2016).
37. Franklin Associates (2014) Impact of plastics packaging on life cycle energy consumption & greenhouse gas emissions in the United States and Canada, substitution analysis. [Online] Available at: https://plastics.americanchemistry.com/Reports-and-Publications/#Life%20Cycle%20Studies (accessed 10 March 2016).
38. Galik CS, Abt RC (2015) Sustainability guidelines and forest market response: an assessment of European Union pellet demand in the southeastern United States. GCB Bioenergy, 1, 1–12.
39. Goetzl A (2015) Developments in the global trade of wood pellets. US Office of Industries working paper, Washington, DC.
40. Goh CS, Junginger M, Cocchi M et al. (2013) Wood pellet market and trade: a global perspective. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 7, 24–42.
41. Gonzalez-Benecke CA, Martin TA, Cropper WP, Bracho R (2010) Forest management effects on in situ and ex situ slash pine forest carbon balance. Forest Ecology and Management, 260, 795–805.
42. Gonzalez-Benecke CA, Martin TA, Jokela EJ, De La Torre R (2011) A flexible hybrid model of life cycle carbon balance for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) management systems. Forests, 2, 749–776.
43. Gustavsson L, Haus S, Ortiz CA, Sathre R, Truong NL (2015) Climate effects of bioenergy from residues in comparison to fossil energy. Applied Energy, 138, 36–50.
44. Harmon ME (2012) The Forest Sector Carbon Calculator. [Online] Available at: http://landcarb.forestry.oregonstate.edu/default.aspx (accessed 18 March 2015).
45. Heath LS, Nichols MC, Smith JE, Mills JR (2010) FORCARB2: An Updated Version of the U. S. Forest Carbon Budget Model. USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, USA.
46. Hoefnagels R, Junginger M, Faaij A (2014) ScienceDirect The economic potential of wood pellet production from alternative, low-value wood sources in the southeast of the U.S. Biomass and Bioenergy, 71, 443–454.
47. Jonker JGG, Junginger M, Faaij A (2013) Carbon payback period and carbon offset parity point of wood pellet production in the South-eastern United States. GCB Bioenergy, 1, 1–19.
48. JRC (2014) Solid and Gaseous Bioenergy Pathways : Input Values and GHG Emissions. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Luxembourg.
49. Lamers P, Junginger M (2013a) The “debt” is in the detail: a synthesis of recent temporal forest carbon analyses on woody biomass for energy. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 7, 373–385.
50. Lamers P, Junginger M, Hamelinck C, Faaij A (2012) Developments in international solid biofuel trade – an analysis of volumes, policies, and market factors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 3176–3199.
51. Lamers P, Thiffault E, Paré D, Junginger M (2013b) Feedstock specific environmental risk levels related to biomass extraction for energy from boreal and temperate forests. Biomass and Bioenergy, 55, 212–226.
52. Lamers P, Junginger M, Dymond CC, Faaij A (2014) Damaged forests provide an opportunity to mitigate climate change. GCB Bioenergy, 6, 44–60.
53. Lamers P, Hoefnagels R, Junginger M, Hamelinck C, Faaij A (2015) Global solid biomass trade for energy by 2020: an assessment of potential import streams and supply costs to North-West Europe under different sustainability constraints. GCB Bioenergy, 7, 618–634.
54. Liski J, Perruchoud D, Karjalainen T (2002) Increasing carbon stock in the forest soils of Western Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 169, 159–175.
55. Magelli F, Boucher K, Bi HT, Melin S, Bonoli A (2009) An environmental impact assessment of exported wood pellets from Canada to Europe. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 434–441.
56. Markewitz D (2006) Fossil fuel carbon emissions from silviculture: impacts on net carbon sequestration in forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 236, 153–161.
57. Marland G, Schlamadinger B (1997) Forests for carbon sequestration of fossil fuel substitutition? A sensitivity analysis. Biomass and Bioenergy, 13, 389–397.
58. Matthews R, Sokka L, Soimakallio S et al. (2014) Review of literature on biogenic carbon and life cycle assessment of forest bioenergy. Final Task 1 report, DG ENER project ‘Carbon impacts of biomass consumed in the EU’.
59. Matthews R, Mortimer N, Lesschen JP et al. (2015) Carbon impacts of biomass consumed in the EU: quantitative assessment. Final project report, project DG ENER/C1/427.
60. McKechnie J, Colombo S, Chen J, Mabee W, MacLean HL (2011) Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 789–795.
61. Mitchell SR, Harmon ME, O'Connell KEB (2012) Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production. GCB Bioenergy, 4, 818–827.
62. Mobley ML, Richter DD, Heine P (2013) Accumulation and decay of woody detritus in a humid subtropical secondary pine forest. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research, 43, 109–118.
63. Naesset E (1999) Decomposition rate constants of Picea abies logs in southeastern Norway. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29, 372–381.
64. NCASI (2016) National Council on Air and Stream Improvement. Carbon OnLine Estimator (COLE) version 3.0. [Online] Available at: http://www.ncasi2.org/GCOLE3/gcole.shtml (accessed 18 January 2016).
65. NIAR (2011) Comparison of environmental impact of plastic, paper and cloth bags. Northern Ireland Assembly Research Register [Online] Available at: http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/assembly-business/committees/archive/environment/archive/research-papers/research-papers-2011/comparison-of-environmental-impact-of-plastic-paper-and-cloth-bags/ (accessed 10 March 2016).
66. NRDC (2015) Think Wood Pellets are Green? Think Again. Natural Resources Defense Council Issue Brief, New York, NY, USA.
67. Olesen AS, Bager SL, Kittler B, Price W, Aguilar F (2016) Environmental Implications of Increased Reliance of the EU on Biomass from the South East US. European Commission Report ENV.B.1/ETU/2014/0043, Luxembourg. pp. 357 [Online] Available at: http://www.aebiom.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/DG-ENVI-study-imports-from-US-Final-report-July-2016.pdf (accessed 12 December 2016).
68. Palosuo T, Wihersaari M, Liski J (2001) Net greenhouse gas emissions due to energy use of forest residues – impact of soil carbon balance. In: Woody Biomass as an Energy Source – Challenges in Europe (eds Pelkonen P, Hakkila P, Karjalainen T, Schlamadinger B), pp. 115–123. European Forest Institute, Saarijärvi, Finland.
69. Palviainen M, Finér L, Kurka A-M, Mannerkoski H, Piirainen S, Starr M (2004) Decomposition and nutrient release from logging residues after clear-cutting of mixed boreal forest. Plant and Soil, 263, 53–67.
70. Pinchot Institute for Conversation (2013) The Transatlantic Trade in Wood for Energy: A Dialogue on Sustainability Standards and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Pinchot Institute for Conversation, Savannah, GA, USA.
71. Prestemon JP, Wear DN, Foster MO (2015) The Global Position of the U.S. Forest Products Industry. USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, USA.
72. Radtke PJ, Amateis RL, Prisley SP, Copenheaver CA, Chojnacky DC, Pittman JR, Burkhart HE (2009) Modeling production and decay of coarse woody debris in loblolly pine plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 790–799.
73. Russel MB, Fraver S, Aakala T, Gove JH, Woodall CW, D'Amato AW, Ducey MJ (2015) Quantifying carbon stores and decomposition in dead wood: a review. Forest Ecology & Management, 350, 107–128.
74. Russell MB, Woodall CW, Fraver S, D'Amato AW, Domke GM, Skog KE (2014) Residence times and decay rates of downed woody debris biomass/carbon in Eastern US Forests. Ecosystems, 17, 765–777.
75. SC Forestry Commision (2015) South Carolina Forestry Commission. Understanding timber as a commodity. [Online] Available at: http://www.state.sc.us/forest/lecom.htm (accessed 12 November 2015).
76. Schlamadinger B, Marland G (1996a) Full fuel cycle carbon balances of bioenergy and forestry options. Energy Conversion and Management, 37, 813–818.
77. Schlamadinger B, Marland G (1996b) The role of forest and bioenergy stragies in the global carbon cycle. Biomass and Bioenergy, 10, 275–300.
78. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA et al. (2008) Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science, 319, 1238–1240.
79. Searchinger TD, Hamburg SP, Melillo J et al. (2009) Fixing a critical climate accounting error. Science, 326, 527–528.
80. Sikkema R, Junginger M, Pichler W, Hayes S, Faaij APC (2010) The international logistics of wood pellets for heating and power production in Europe: costs, energy-input and greenhouse gas balances of pellet consumption in Italy, Sweden and the Netherlands. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 4, 132–153.
81. Sikkema R, Steiner M, Junginger M, Hiegl W, Hansen MT, Faaij A (2011) The European wood pellet markets: current status and prospects for 2020. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 5, 250–278.
82. Smith JE, Heath LS, Skog KE, Birdsey RA (2006) Methods for Calculating Forest Ecosystem and Harvested Carbon With Standard Estimates for Forest Types of the United States. USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, USA.
83. Stephenson AL, MacKay DJ (2014) Life Cycle Impacts of Biomass Electricity in 2020. Department of Energy & Climate Change, London, UK.
84. Thiffault E, Endres J, McCubbins JSN, Junginger M, Lorente M, Fritsche U, Iriarte L (2015) Sustainability of forest bioenergy feedstock supply chains: local, national and international policy perspectives. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 9, 283–292.
85. Vis M, Mantau U, Allen B (eds.) (2016) Study on the Optimised Cascading use of Wood. Final report. No 394/PP/ENT/RCH/14/7689. Brussels.
86. Walker T, Cardellichio P, Colnes A et al. (2010) Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study. Manomet Centre for Conservation Sciences, Brunswick, ME, USA.
87. Wang W, Dwivedi P, Abt R, Khanna M (2015) Carbon savings with transatlantic trade in pellets: accounting for market-driven effects. Environmental Research Letters, 10, 1–13.
88. Wear D, Greis J (2012) Summary Report The Southern Forest Futures Project. USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, USA.
89. Wear DN, Greis JG (2013) The Southern Forest Futures Project: technical report. Available at: http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/44183 (accessed 18 March 2015).
90. Zanchi G, Pena N, Bird N (2010) The Upfront Carbon Debt of Bioenergy. Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria.
91. Zanchi G, Pena N, Bird N (2012) Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel. GCB Bioenergy, 4, 761–772.