Re-thinking the Duplication of Speaker/Hearer Belief in the Epistemology of Testimony

Episteme

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 129-134

  Buenting, Joel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010659699     PISSN: 17423600     EISSN: 17500117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3366/epi.2005.2.2.129     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Davis S. (2002). “Conversation, Epistemology, and Norms”. Mind and Language, vol. 17, pp. 513–537.
2. Fricker E. (1987). “The Epistemology of Testimony”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 89, pp. 159–177.
3. Fricker E. (1994). “Against Fallibility”. In Matilal B. K. and Chakrabarti A (eds), Knowing From Words. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Fricker E. (1995). “Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony.” Mind, vol. 104, pp. 392–411.
5. Goldberg S. (2001). “Testimony Based Knowledge from False Testimony”. Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 51, pp. 512–26.
6. Goldberg S. (forthcoming). “Towards an Epistemically-Grounded, Semantically Useful notion of What is Said”. In Stainton R. and Viger C. (eds), Compositionality, Context, and Semantic Values.
7. Grice H. P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
8. Kenyon T. (2005). “Non-Sentences, Implicature, and Success in Communication”. Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech. Elugardo R. and Stainton R. (eds), Dordrecht: Springer.
9. Lackey J. (forthcoming). “Learning From Words”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
10. Sperber D. and Wilson D. (1987). “Preçis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 10, pp. 697–711. Reprinted in H. Geirson and M. Losonsky (eds) (1996). Readings in Language and Mind. Cambridge: Blackwell.
11. Sperber D. and Wilson D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Blackwell.
12. Sperber D. and Wilson D. (1998). “The Mapping Between the Mental and the Public Lexicon”. Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.