The Bias Paradox in Feminist Standpoint Epistemology

Episteme

Volumn 3, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 125-136

  Rolin, Kristina ^a  

^a HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010637372     PISSN: 17423600     EISSN: 17500117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.125     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Anderson E. (1995). “Knowledge, human interest, and objectivity in feminist epistemology”. Philosophical Topics 23(2): 27–58.
2. Anderson E. (2004). “Uses of value judgments in science: A general argument, with lessons from a case study of feminist research on divorce”. Hypatia 19(1): 1–24.
3. Antony L. (1993). “Quine as feminist: The radical import of naturalized epistemology”. In Antony L. and Witt C. (eds.), A mind of one's own: Feminist essays on reason and objectivity, pp. 185–225. Boulder: Westview Press.
4. Cole J. R. (1987). Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community. New York: Columbia University Press (first published in 1979 by the Free Press).
5. Harding S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
6. Hekman S. (2000). “Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited”. In Allen C. and Howard J. A. (eds.), Provoking feminisms, pp. 9–34. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
7. Katila S. and Meriläinen S. (1999). “A serious researcher or just another nice girl? Doing gender in a male dominated scientific community”. Gender, Work, Organization 6(3): 163–73.
8. Longino H. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9. Longino H. (1999). “Feminist epistemology”. In Greco J. and Sosa E. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, pp. 327–53. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Pinnick C. (1994). “Feminist epistemology: Implications for philosophy of science”. Philosophy of Science 61: 646–57.
11. Pinnick C. (2005). “The failed feminist challenge to ‘fundamental epistemology’.” Science & Education 14: 103–16.
12. Pohlhaus G. (2002). “Knowing communities: An investigation of Harding's standpoint epistemology.” Social Epistemology 163: 283–93.
13. Williams M. (2001). Problems of knowledge: A critical introduction to epistemology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Wylie A. (2003). “Why standpoint matters”. In Figueroa R. and Harding S. (eds.), Science and other cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology, pp. 26–48. New York and London: Routledge.