Leadership of information technology for teacher education: A discussion of complex systems with dynamic models to inform shared leadership

Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 253-272

  Davis, Niki ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010629607     PISSN: 0962029X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14759390200200136     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allen, K.E. & Cherry, C. (2000) Systemic Leadership: Enriching the meaning of our work. American College Personnel Association, National Association for Campus Activities. Washington, DC: University Press
2. Association for Information Technology in Teacher Education (ITTE) (1988) IT in Teacher Education: Under resourced? Under staffed? Under planned? Croydon: ITTE
3. Breuleux, A. (2002) Personal communication
4. CEO Forum (2000) StaR Chart for Teacher Education [on-line]. Available at: Http://www.ceoforum.org/reports.cfm
5. Cilliers, P. (1998) Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London and New York: Routledge
6. Cornu, B. (Supervisor) (2001) Winds of Change in the Teaching Profession. The report from the French National Commission for UNESCO. Paris: UNESCO
7. Davis, N.E. (1991) Reflecting on IT Professional Development: In depth support, Developing IT in Teacher Education, National Council for Educational Technology, I, pp. 17-26
8. Davis, N.E. (1997) Strategies for Staff and Institutional Development for IT in Education: An integrated approach, in B. Somekh & N.E. Davis (Eds) Using Information Technology Effectively in Teaching and Learning: studies in teacher education. London: Routledge
9. Davis, N.E. (2001) International Contrasts of Information Technology in Teacher Education: Multiple perspectives on change (Editorial), Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, pp. 139-147
10. Davis, N.E., Kemis, M. & Johnson, N. (in press) A Path to the Future: Generative evaluation for simultaneous renewal of ICT teacher education and K-12 schools. Paper presented at IFIP 3.3/3.1 Conference, Melbourne, January 2003
11. Department for Education and Science (1989) Information Technology in Initial Teacher Training. The report of the expert group chaired by Janet Trotter. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office
12. Desforges, C. (2001) Familiar Challenges and New Approaches: Necessary advances in theory and methods in research on teaching and learning. The Desmond Nuttall/Carfax Memorial Lecture. British Educational Research Association (BERA) annual conference, Cardiff, August 2000. Nottingham: BERA
13. Ellsworth, J.B. (2000) Surviving Change: A survey of educational change models. Syracuse: Educational Resources Information Center. Also available on-line at: http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed444597.html
14. Gardner, J.W. (1990) On Leadership. New York: The Free Press: Simon & Schuster
15. Gladwell, M. (2000) The Tipping Point: How little things make a difference. New York: Little Brown & Company
16. Goodlad, J. (1994) Educational Renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
17. Hall, G. & Hord, S. (1987) Change in Schools: Facilitating the process. Albany: State University of New York Press
18. Hock, D. (2000) The Art of Chaordic Leadership, in F. Hesselbein & R. Johnston (Eds) On Mission and Leadership: A leader to leader guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
19. Horton, A. (1991) Exploring Information Technology for Teaching and Learning in the Humanities, Developing IT in Teacher Education, National Council for Educational Technology, 1, pp. 5-15
20. International Society for Technology in Education (2000) National Educational Technology Standards Web Sites: Http://www.iste.org and http://cnets.iste.org
21. Ley, K. & Crawford, C. (2002) Web, Web-enhanced or 80/20: Choosing the instructional model that makes sense, in D.A. Willis, J. Price, N.E. Davis (Eds) Proceedings of SITE 2002, pp. 973-975, & Nashville, March. Norfolk: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education
22. National Academy of Sciences (2002) The Concerns-based Adoption Model (CBAM): A model for change in individuals [on-line]. Available at: http://www.nationalacademies.org/rise/backg4a.htm
23. National Council for Educational Technology (1992) Managing IT. Coventry: NCET (now the British Educational Communications and Technology Agency)
24. Ogwa, R.T. & Bossert, S.J. (1995) Leadership as an Organizational Quality, Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, pp. 224-243
25. Sandholtz, J., Ringstaff, C. & Dwyer, D. (1997) The Evolution of Instruction in Technology-rich Classrooms, in Teaching with Technology: Creating student-centered classrooms, pp. 33-54. New York: Teachers College Press
26. Senge, P.M. (1990) The Fifth Discipline. London: Doubleday
27. Somekh, B. & Davis, N. (Eds) (1997) Using Information Technology Effectively in Teaching and Learning: Studies in teacher education. London: Routledge
28. Tearle, P.A. & Davis, N.E. (Eds) (1999) The T3 Core Curriculum [on-line]. Available at: Http://www.telematics.ex.ac.uk/T3
29. Thompson, A., Schmidt, D. & Davis N.E. (in press) Technology Collaborators for Simultaneous Renewal in Teacher Education, Educational Technology Research & Development. Special issue on technology and teacher education
30. Trend R., Davis, N.E. & Loveless, A. (1999) Information and Communications Technology. Letts QTS Series. London: Letts
31. UNESCO (in press) Information and Communication Technologies and Teacher Education. Paris: UNESCO