MIXING BRICKS WITH CLICKS: ORGANIZATION DESIGN FOR BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER ELECTRONIC COMMERCE IN INCUMBENT RETAILERS

Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 445-457

  Westerman, George ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

electronic commerce; Innovation; IT strategy; organization design; project management

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER ELECTRONIC COMMERCES; DISCONTINOUS INNOVATION; HYBRID MODEL; INNOVATION; IT STRATEGIES; ORGANIZATION DESIGN; ORGANIZATION THEORY; ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES; TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIES; THEORETICAL MODELING;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 85010621039     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Abernathy, W. The Productivity Dilemma. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1978.
2. Abernathy, W., and Clark, K. “Innovation: Mapping the Winds of Creative Destruction,” Research Policy (14), February 1985, pp. 3-22.
3. Anderson, P., and Tushman, M. “Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change,” Administrative Science Quarterly (35:4), 1990, pp. 604-633.
4. Brown, S., and Eisenhardt, K. “The Art of Continuous Change,” Administrative Science Quarterly (42), 1997, pp. 1-34.
5. Christensen, C. The Innovator’s Dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
6. Christensen, C., and Tedlow, R. “Patterns of Disruption in Retailing,” Harvard Business Review, January-February 2000, pp. 42-45.
7. Donaldson, L. American Anti-Management Theories of Organization. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
8. Galbraith, J. “Organization Design: An Information Processing View,” Interfaces (4:3), 1974, pp. 28-36.
9. Gatignon, H., Tushman, M., Smith, W., and Anderson, P. “A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation,” Management Science, 2002 (forthcoming).
10. Gulati, R., and Garino, J. “Get the Right Mix of Clicks and Bricks,” Harvard Business Review, May-June 2000, pp. 107-114.
11. Henderson, R., and Clark, K. B. “Architectural Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly (35), March 1990, pp. 9-30.
12. Iansiti, M. Technology Integration. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
13. Lawrence, P., and Lorsch, J. Organization and Environment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1967.
14. McGrath, R., and MacMillan, I. The Entrepreneurial Mindset. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000.
15. Subramani, M., and Walden, E. “The Impact of E-Commerce Announcements on the Market Value of Firms,” Information Systems Research (12:2), 2001, pp. 135-154.
16. Swanson, E. B. “Information Systems Innovation Among Organizations,” Management Science (40:9), 1994.
17. Tushman, M., and Murmann, J. “Dominant Designs, Technology Cycles, and Organizational Outcomes,” Research in Organizational Behavior (20), 1998, pp. 231-266.
18. Van de Ven, A. H., and Drazin, R. “The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory,” Research in Organizational Behavior (7), 1985, pp. 333-365.
19. Venkatraman, N., and Prescott, J. E. “Environment-Strategy Coalignment: An Empirical Test of its Performance Implications,” Strategic Management Journal (11), 1990, pp. 1-23.
20. Westerman, G. Innovating While Integrating. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard Business School, 2002.