The special system: Searching time-compressed digital video lectures

Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 77-86

  Harrigan, Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Learning eficiency; Multimedia instructio; Time compressed speech; Time compressed video

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010619081     PISSN: 08886504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08886504.2000.10782301     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Arons, B. (1994). Interactively skimming recorded speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
2. Authorware professional for Windows [Computer software]. (1992). San Francisco: Macromedia.
3. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon Press.
4. Duker, S. (Ed.). (1974). Time compressed speech: An anthology and bibliography. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.
5. Fairbanks, G., Guttman, N., & Miron, M. S. (1957). Effects of time compression on the comprehension of connected speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 22, 10-19.
6. Foulke, E. (1971). The perception of time compressed speech. In P. Kjedergaard, D. Horton, & J. Jenkins (Eds.), Perception of language. Proceedings of a symposium of the Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh (pp. 79-107). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
7. Harrigan, K. A. (1995a). The SPECIAL system: Self-paced education with compressed interactive audio learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27(3), 361-370.
8. Harrigan, K. A. (1995b). The intelligibility of time-compressed digital-video lectures. In Y. Anzai, K. Ogawa, & H. Mori (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth international conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 61-66). Tokyo: Elsevier.
9. Harrigan, K. A., & McLean, R. (1995). Effects of time-compression and iconic indexing of digital-video lectures. In H. Maurer (Ed.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA ‘95: World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia (pp. 295-300). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
10. Johnson, W., Darley, F., & Spriestersbach, D. C. (1963). Diagnostic methods in speech pathology. New York: Harper & Row.
11. Junor, L. (1992). Teaching by tape: Some benefits, problems, and solutions. Distance Education, 13(1), 93-107.
12. Roucos, S., & Wilgus, A. M. (1985). High-quality time-scale modifications for speech. In IEEE: Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (PP. 493-496). New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
13. University of Maryland (1989). Managing the human computer interface [Videotape]. College Park, MD: Author.
14. University of Maryland. (1991). HCIL open home ‘91 [Videotape]. College Park, MD: Author.
15. VidEdit [Computer software]. (1994). Redmond, WA: Microsoft.
16. Video for Windows [Computer software]. (1992). Redmond, WA: Microsoft.
17. Video for Windows Developer’s Kit [Computer software]. (1993). Redmond, WA: Microsoft.
18. Wave for Windows [Computer software]. (1992). Yonkers, NY: Voyetra Turtle Beach, Inc.
19. Windows [Computer software]. (1994-2000). Redmond, WA: Microsoft.