The doing of rural community development research

Rural Society

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 313-328

  Luloff, A E ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010618899     PISSN: 10371656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/rsj.9.1.313     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bourke, L. & A.E. Luloff. 1995. 'Leaders perspectives on rural tourism: Case studies in Pennsylvania.’ Journal of the Community Development Society 26(2): 224-239.
2. Bourke, L. & A.E. Luloff. 1996. 'Rural tourism development: Are communities in southwest rural Pennsylvania ready to participate?’ In L.C. Harrison & W. Husbands (eds) Practicing responsible tourism: International case studies in tourism planning, development, and marketing. New York: Wiley: 277-295.
3. Claude, L. & A.E. Luloff. 1995. ‘Comparative case studies: Coudersport, Austin, Liberty, and Emporium.’ Penn State Research Report No. AERS 252. University Park, PA: Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
4. Claude, L. & A.E. Luloff. 1996. The relationship between community activeness and community success: How do researchers know?’ In H.E. Echelberger (ed) Rural America: A living tapestry. Radnor, PA: USDA Forest Service: 12-19.
5. Denzin, N.K. 1970. The research act. Chicago: Aldine.
6. Dillman, D. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.
7. Israel, G.D. & L.J. Beaulieu. 1990. 'Community leadership.' In Luloff & Swanson (eds) American rural communities. Boulder: Westview:181-202.
8. Kaufman, H.F. 1985. An action approach to community development.’ Research in Rural Sociology and Development 2: 53-65.
9. Krannich, R.S. & C.R. Humphrey. 1983.”Local mobilisation and community growth: Towards an assessment of the growth machine hypothesis.” Rural Sociology 48(1): 6081.
10. Krannich, R.S. & C.R. Humphrey. 1986. 'Using key informants in comparative community research: An empirical assessment.’ Sociological Methods and Research 14(4): 473-493.
11. Kreahling, K.S., S.M. Smith & A.E. Luloff. 'Economic restructuring in the nonmetropolitan Northeast: Adaptations to transitions.’ Penn State Research Report No. AERS 253. University Park, PA: Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
12. Luloff, A.E. 1990.’Communities and social change: How do small communities act?’ In Luloff & Swanson (eds) American Rural Communities. Boulder: Westview: 214-227.
13. Luloff, A.E. 1995. Regaining vitality in the forestry profession: A sociologist’s perspective.’ Journal of Forestry 93(11): 6-9.
14. Luloff, A.E. & L.E. Swanson. 1995.’Studying the disaffected community: Lessons for human resource enhancement.' In Beaulieu & Mulkey (eds) Investing in people: The human capital needs of rural America. Boulder: Westview: 351-372.
15. Nord, M. & A.E. Luloff. 1993. 'Socioeconomic heterogeneity of mining-dependent counties.’ Rural Sociology 58(3): 492-500.
16. Nord, M. et al. 1994. 'Economic restructuring and rural community transformation in Pennsylvania.' Penn State Research Report No. AERS 246. University Park, PA: Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
17. Parisi, D. & A.E. Luloff. 1999. ‘The use of key informants for crosscomparative community studies.’ In preparation for submission to Rural Sociology.
18. Tashakkori, A. & C. Teddlie. 1998. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
19. Wilkinson, K.P. 1970. ‘Phases and roles in community action.’ Rural Sociology 35(1): 54-68.
20. Wilkinson, K.P. 1991. The community in rural America. Westport: Greenwood. Rural Society. Volume 9. Number 1.